|
5 months ago ::
Oct 23, 2009 - 2:02PM
#11
|
|
|
Can you spend a fp to move faster on movement generated by rolling cleave (or for knight speed or master speed for that matter)?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 23, 2009 - 4:21PM
#12
|
- Forum Guide
- SWMGamers Hall of Fame Inductee
- Official Star Wars Minis Net Rep
|
No to Rolling Cleave. It's not part of your normal move on your turn. Assuming you have a way to spend FP twice in a turn, yes, you can add one (or more) Move Faster stacked on a normal move that includes Knight Speed or Master Speed. So MotF2 with a normal character using Master Speed would be 6+6+2=14 with attack or 12+6+2=18 without attacking. And the unasked question, no to end of turn movement from Rex or similar for the same reason as Rolling Cleave.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 24, 2009 - 9:10AM
#13
|
|
|
I have General Skywalker, Commander Ashoka, and Kit Fisto, Jedi Master with Mas. So Kit Fisto does not move on his turn to do his Double Twin Attack, if he were to kill a piece and then activate Rolling Cleave and move one square and make another Twin attack would he gain Momentum on that attack and the double thereafter? Also kind of realted. If I were to move a piece 6 squares and use lightsaber sweep and kill a piece activate Rolling Cleave, move a square and then make an immediate attack would I then be able to attack every figure adjacent to him after the Cleave? Thank you.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 24, 2009 - 9:21AM
#14
|
- Forum Guide
- SWMGamers Hall of Fame Inductee
- Official Star Wars Minis Net Rep
|
I have General Skywalker, Commander Ashoka, and Kit Fisto, Jedi Master with Mas.
So Kit Fisto does not move on his turn to do his Double Twin Attack, if he were to kill a piece and then activate Rolling Cleave and move one square and make another Twin attack would he gain Momentum on that attack and the double thereafter?
Yes. He ended a move within range of the commander effect, triggering it.
If I were to move a piece 6 squares and use lightsaber sweep and kill a piece activate Rolling Cleave, move a square and then make an immediate attack would I then be able to attack every figure adjacent to him after the Cleave?
Yes. Sweep remains in effect until you've attacked each adjacent enemy. Moving mid-sweep could create (or eliminate) some adjacent enemies.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 24, 2009 - 4:24PM
#15
|
- SWMGamers Hall of Fame Inductee
- SWM DCI Guru
|
So Nickname quick question are they going to errata General SKywlaker to counts as Anakin Skywalker or otherwise are we going to have Anakin CON running around getting momentum????? Just thought I would ask since I cant find it on the errata page but they got Yularen
 Collection: 801/801 SWM DCI Content Manager 
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 24, 2009 - 7:09PM
#16
|
|
|
So Nickname quick question are they going to errata General SKywlaker to counts as Anakin
VERY nice catch Dean. Someone actually READS the cards.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 24, 2009 - 8:22PM
#17
|
- Forum Guide
- SWMGamers Hall of Fame Inductee
- Official Star Wars Minis Net Rep
|
No errata is necessary. Ranks are not part of the consideration for Unique so in the Republic faction all "Skywalker" are the same. As are all "Ahsoka", and all "Kenobi". Same with "Leia" recently. We stopped going full tilt on the "counts as" several sets back--forget which exactly but Gary was still doing the JC columns at the time and and did the one all about "counts as". So maybe A&Eish with Imperial Gov Tarkin? Counts as is now only used when the name is completely unrelated--like the Arica/Mara situation for example. Any point of confusion can be added to the FAQ.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 25, 2009 - 10:15AM
#18
|
- SWMGamers Hall of Fame Inductee
- SWM DCI Guru
|
I would think maybe something needs to be added. Because I myself like to use the common sense approach. I also some people dont they play on techinicalities. So maybe a blurb covering that in the FAQ would be appropriate... like a cover all like you just stated.
Collection: 801/801 SWM DCI Content Manager
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 25, 2009 - 7:26PM
#19
|
|
|
I don't think it can hurt. Dean is correct in that the weird situation of this game is that while MOST rules follow a literal interpretation, there are some exceptions to it. This area of the FAQ could be updated to match what is common place. Its a bit hypocritical for the rules of "name contains" and "named" to so stringently follow the literal interpretation, but things like this be seemingly more lax. When do we choose for rules to be very seriously nit picky and others to not be? That sort of thing.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Oct 25, 2009 - 7:27PM
#20
|
|
|
Thx for the answer!
|
|
|
