Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 29 of 29  •  Prev 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29
4 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2009 - 6:50AM #281
Madslaust
Date Joined: Jun 28, 2006
Posts: 1,504

Boris_the_Dwarf wrote:

I've been dealing with WotC for over 10 years. If the floor rules actually go up tomorrow, I will be surprised.

It might mean that hell has officially frozen over. :P


Shoot, I thought July 1 was today. I didn't notice until you said something.

Gosh-darn it I lost my signature.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2009 - 11:54AM #282
Barongrackle
Date Joined: Mar 12, 2007
Posts: 2,066
You know, before I looked through this thread, I HAD assumed that it merged numerous different GOWK Threads that had appeared with similar-though-distinct topics. I was mistaken. It only merges four previous threads:

*Shouldn't ban Anything
*Favorite GOWK thread?
*GOWK's Soresu Style Mastery, should be fixed!
*Honest-to-Goodness Question (and answers...?) Concerning (our most beloved) GOWK


The others are still littered about, somewhere on the later pages.

It looks like... three of the threads are talking about the same thing. Presumably one is an original, since something had to come first. The other is a joke (Mine, so I'm a little offended, mind you, in a not-so-serious way. I just have to hassle.).

So the merge has removed two arguably redundant threads. But I know I saw more than that. What happened to the other threads about GOWK?

Let's see, there are three on the front page now. This one, the one I started to complain about the merge or potential ban (which I am now trying to let die), and the one created by DalsianDon that people were actually posting in.

Huh.

So, it's almost as if... people have naturally gravitated their GOWK discussions into a single thread, while the others have fallen to the other pages. It's almost as if GOWK discussions are not preventing people from posting about different topics, or something.

But anyway, back to a quarter of this thread's original topic...

My NEW favorite GOWK thread is Mini's that should be Banned (a satire), for succeeding in uniqueness where my own thread could not.

"Geeze, BaronGrackle, give it a rest."

Okay, okay. Just so you know. Step on a dog's tail, and it whines. :P
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2009 - 12:12PM #283
CerousMutor
Date Joined: Aug 15, 2008
Posts: 1,645

Shadows_ wrote:

Ah, apologies then =)

It sounded abit like you were just giving the "zomgf don't ban him it will end the game etc., oh but I don't play DCI at all rant" that's been done alot and caused alot of unneeded trouble.

But you later posts have made it clear that's not the case, so apologies.

And I agree, he needs a ban for the right reasons only, but whilst some may seem to think otherwise, I think the majority of the pro-banners want it for the right reasons (i.e. restricts the Meta to GOWK and anti-GOWK, overpowered etc.)


Definatly no need to apologies.
My lady often says to me I should think and talk at the same time rather than in two seperate exercises

A good workman doesn’t blame his tools.

Overall winner of the "Alien Scum" custom contest!

Good Trades :
Boss Nass;Sith_Slayer;lukey84;Biggsy;Kael_Dro nna;Reysan_Aura;Purple_Wind;The_Fringer

Bad Trades 0
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2009 - 12:17PM #284
StriderRe80
Date Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Posts: 722

CerousMutor wrote:

Definatly no need to apologies.
My lady often says to me I should think and talk at the same time rather than in two seperate exercises


lol i have been guilty of that as well

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2009 - 3:52PM #285
headache62
Date Joined: May 31, 2005
Posts: 3,619

CerousMutor wrote:

Definatly no need to apologies.
My lady often says to me I should think and talk at the same time rather than in two seperate exercises


I would say that one should think, and THEN talk

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2009 - 4:26PM #286
CerousMutor
Date Joined: Aug 15, 2008
Posts: 1,645

headache62 wrote:

I would say that one should think, and THEN talk


Whoa!! Hold on there! Baby steps, baby steps. :D

I do thw thinking part but it gets lost in translation.

A good workman doesn’t blame his tools.

Overall winner of the "Alien Scum" custom contest!

Good Trades :
Boss Nass;Sith_Slayer;lukey84;Biggsy;Kael_Dro nna;Reysan_Aura;Purple_Wind;The_Fringer

Bad Trades 0
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jun 30, 2009 - 9:59PM #287
trappedslider
Date Joined: Jan 14, 2004
Posts: 9,473

Boris_the_Dwarf wrote:

I've been dealing with WotC for over 10 years. If the floor rules actually go up tomorrow, I will be surprised.

It might mean that hell has officially frozen over. :P


Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me.
Fool me 100 times, well then I'm just a freakin' gullible idiot.


well, Sarah's said to me via pm* there will be a big announcement about the GOWK threads on the boards after next weekend. So, I'm thinking that it may be around that time the floor rules update will be up from the web team due to the July 4th weekend.

Nice saying by the way,if i had more room in my sig I would sig it....


*for the pm please send me a pm and i will gladly forward it to you

[QUOTE=ThorvaldHafgrimsson]Life is full of choices. Sometimes you make the good ones, and sometimes you have to kill all the witnesses.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=NastasiaLorn;]
But then you have to pay the liability insurance.[/QUOTE]
A note about character and world creation
Spoiler: Show

Character and world creation are a form of expression. The point is that some people don't have much to say...

Apr 27, 2013 -- 2:00PM, The_Silversword wrote:

Why doesnt anyone ever sig my qoutes!?


On the subject of who post in the Off-Topic Tavern:

May 11, 2013 -- 3:42AM, ADHadh wrote:

most of them are bored, immature adults.


Offical troller of the House of Trolls

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 years ago  ::  Jul 01, 2009 - 12:54PM #288
MickeySmith
Date Joined: Mar 7, 2009
Posts: 63
Well I for one admit I have not followed the argument. I do not know if this idea has been submitted, but most likely someone has thought of it. I for one would much rather see an errata than a ban. I would suggest degrading the Sorensu to succeed on a 15 or 16 rather than an 11. Personally I feel that dropping the success rate should allow the fig to be playable and priced fair enough for competition. It seems the whole complaint is on that one skill. By fixing it I'm hoping the fig gets fixed enough I can still play it if I want.

If this has already been discussed my apologies for not having the time to keep up with the forum :D
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 29 of 29  •  Prev 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing