Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 3 of 6  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Switching to a Superior Implement
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 11:20AM #21
kenobi65
  • Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined: May 6, 2001
Posts: 1,919

Mar 17, 2010 -- 10:59AM, ARlife wrote:

(When you have the best possible attack bonus as a caster and miss on a 14 on the die, where as a weapon user, you would hit on an 11-12, you see these things).




True, though, in most cases, a caster is going against a NAD, while a weapon user is going against AC...and, in most cases, monsters' NADs are weaker than their ACs.

"Of course [Richard] has a knife.  He always has a knife.  We all have knives.  It's 1183, and we're barbarians!" - Eleanor of Aquitaine, "The Lion in Winter"
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 11:21AM #22
Ferol_debtor_of_Torm
Date Joined: Jun 10, 2004
Posts: 852
Since ARlife didn't seem to understand this I'll break it down for every weapon that has a superior equivalent.

Weapons that do get a bonus to attacks for going from military to superior

Longspear -> Greatspear

Flail -> Hydra Flail

Crossbow -> Superior Crossbow

Weapons that do not get a bonus to attacks for going from military to  superior

Greataxe -> Execution Axe

Maul -> Mordenkrad

Greatsword -> Fullblade

Longsword -> Bastard Sword

Warhammer -> Craghammer

Battleaxe -> War Axe

Javelin -> Tratnyr

Shortsword -> Rapier

Longbow -> Greatbow
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 11:38AM #23
ARlife
Date Joined: Nov 22, 2006
Posts: 143
Except when weapons users can attack NADs on a regular basis with proficiency bonus. I mean piercing strike vs say a magic missile. Both just do damage, but piercing strike can be up to +4 higher accuracy wise than the magic missiler.  Or sometimes the NADs are higher than the AC of the creature. This actually shouldnt be a feat, they should just be a properties for implements like how weapons have brutal/high crit/etc.. But we take what we can get.

BTW, thank you Ferol, for mentioning all the superior weapons and their counterparts.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 12:02PM #24
Thanlis
Date Joined: Aug 22, 2007
Posts: 837

Mar 17, 2010 -- 11:02AM, Hibiki54 wrote:

I temporary took this feat for my Sorceress thanks to the Dragon article. Hopefully a new P2 mod comes out before I'm nerfed.




You're not even empowered yet, since superior implement daggers aren't currently legal. End of month!

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 12:27PM #25
Hibiki54
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2008
Posts: 1,103
Exactly. When new P2 mods come out.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 1:34PM #26
ibixat
Date Joined: Oct 19, 2008
Posts: 1,251
Nads were supposed to often be lower than AC, but play a storm sorcerer using thunder powers vs fortitude for a while and you'll see just how annoyingly high fortitude is on a lot of monsters.  Fort is even higher than AC for most brutes, which makes the lack of a proficiency bonus quite painful since brutes seem to be pretty common.

check out this enworld link for the first MM stats

www.enworld.org/forum/d-d-4th-edition-ru...
 
Implement users vs will and reflex are fine, since it's a 2-3 point lower average than AC, Fort starts at less than a 2 point difference below AC and ends at less than 1 point below ac average at epic.

A "Feat Tax" would be a feat that gives implement users an untyped +1 bonus to hit fort, or better yet a +1 at paragon and +2 at epic.  To bring it in line with implement attacks against will and reflex. 
Blah blah blah
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 1:39PM #27
Drezden
Date Joined: Mar 6, 2003
Posts: 752

Mar 17, 2010 -- 12:02PM, Thanlis wrote:

Mar 17, 2010 -- 11:02AM, Hibiki54 wrote:

I temporary took this feat for my Sorceress thanks to the Dragon article. Hopefully a new P2 mod comes out before I'm nerfed.




You're not even empowered yet, since superior implement daggers aren't currently legal. End of month!




Superior Implements are currently legal.  PHB material is legal upon release (see RPGA CCG v. 1.95, p. 2).  PHB 3 has been released -- in fact many of us have had it for over a week.  Therefore, Superior Implements are legal (even though they haven't been added to Character Builder yet.

Daren

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 1:40PM #28
ibixat
Date Joined: Oct 19, 2008
Posts: 1,251

Mar 17, 2010 -- 1:39PM, Drezden wrote:

Mar 17, 2010 -- 12:02PM, Thanlis wrote:

Mar 17, 2010 -- 11:02AM, Hibiki54 wrote:

I temporary took this feat for my Sorceress thanks to the Dragon article. Hopefully a new P2 mod comes out before I'm nerfed.




You're not even empowered yet, since superior implement daggers aren't currently legal. End of month!




Superior Implements are currently legal.  PHB material is legal upon release (see RPGA CCG v. 1.95, p. 2).  PHB 3 has been released -- in fact many of us have had it for over a week.  Therefore, Superior Implements are legal (even though they haven't been added to Character Builder yet.

Daren




Superior dagger implements however are in dragon and not phb3, so they are not legal till end of month.

Blah blah blah
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 1:42PM #29
tilobin
Date Joined: Apr 16, 2009
Posts: 614

Mar 17, 2010 -- 1:39PM, Drezden wrote:


Superior Implements are currently legal.  PHB material is legal upon release (see RPGA CCG v. 1.95, p. 2).  PHB 3 has been released -- in fact many of us have had it for over a week.  Therefore, Superior Implements are legal (even though they haven't been added to Character Builder yet.




Except for superior daggers, which only exist in the current uncompiled Dragon, which is what is being referred to above.

EDIT: NINJA'D 

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 17, 2010 - 2:01PM #30
Dragon9
  • Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined: Jul 16, 2002
Posts: 4,997

Mar 17, 2010 -- 10:54AM, Ferol_debtor_of_Torm wrote:

You're right. It's not a actual 'tax' but it's still crummy because its a feat that is so overwhelmingly good that the vast majority of players will have to take it. That, IMO, is poor design.




It's not necessary, but you have to take it?  That makes no sense. 

Sorry WOTC, you lost me with Essentials.  So where I used to buy every book that came out, now I will be very choosy about what I buy.  Can we just get back to real 4e?

Check out the 4e Conversion Wiki.

1. Wizards fight dirty.  They hit their enemies in the NADs. -- Dragon9
2. A barbarian hits people with his axe.  A warlord hits people with his barbarian.
3. Boo-freakin'-hoo, ya light-slingin' finger-wigglers. -- MrCelcius in response to the Cleric's Healer's Lore nerf
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 6  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing