Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 9 of 9  •  Prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Switch to Forum Live View Deities in LFR for Divine Classes.
3 years ago  ::  Mar 23, 2010 - 3:53PM #81
Crodocile
Date Joined: Nov 15, 2004
Posts: 818
Kinda.  I started playing with 1st edition and the old-school greyhawk gods.  I always thought Nerull was cool, and it bothers me that they killed off a classic deity to fit in a newbie and make her seem stronger.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 24, 2010 - 1:24PM #82
GreySector
Date Joined: Dec 15, 2005
Posts: 126
Of my 18 leveled characters only two have the divine power source on their base class (two more have it on their paragon path).  They are Corellon Larethian, Tempus, Moradin and Oghma.

Half Elf Warlord (lawful-good) Torm
Human Wizard (good) Oghma
Dwarf Fighter (unaligned) Moradin
Grugach Cleric (unaligned) Corellon Larethian
Half-Orc Rogue (unaligned) Waukeen
Tiefling Warlord (unaligned) Waukeen
Half-Elf Bard (unaligned) Milil
Drow Fighter (unaligned) [undeclared]
Aasimar Artificer (unaligned) Gond
Elf Avenger (unaligned) Tempus
Stormsoul Genasi Wizard (good) [undeclared]
Bladeling Monk (unaligned) Tempus
Kalashtar Psion (unaligned) [undeclared]
Drow Bard (good) Selune
Half-Orc Barbarian (unaligned) [undeclared]
Changeling Bard (unaligned) [undeclared]
Human Fighter (unaligned) [undelcared]
Half-Elf Ardent (unaligned) Red Knight
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 26, 2010 - 6:23PM #83
Truefan
Date Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Posts: 16

Mar 23, 2010 -- 3:53PM, Crodocile wrote:

Kinda.  I started playing with 1st edition and the old-school greyhawk gods.  I always thought Nerull was cool, and it bothers me that they killed off a classic deity to fit in a newbie and make her seem stronger.



when i first picked up 4e PHB (Origins i believe it was 2005 right after 4th was announced at Gencon) the first thing i noticed was the absence of greyhawk gods(like Obad-Hai), and the addition of Forgotten realms gods, (like corellon *sp) i do miss the greyhawk gods.  in previous editions the greyhawk gods were the standard and forgotten realms gods (as well as alternative forgotten realms rules) were included in their own core book seperating themselves from the rest of D&D.  now, since forgotten realms has subverted greyhawk as a the standard i think they should release a greyhawk alternative core book, like they did for forgotten realms for so long (1988)

of course this alt core should include greyhawk deities and more greyhawk styled races, (like forgotten realms introducing gold dwarves and dragonborn as standard races) allowing grey elves, and deep halflings to name some, and removing more forgotten realms styled races for more greyhawk flavor (replacing eladrin with a similar High elf version, mostly a description change, and removing dragonborn, maybe replacing with centaurs from the brightlands or id love to see some lizardfolk from Hepmonland)

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 27, 2010 - 10:37PM #84
kenobi65
  • Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined: May 6, 2001
Posts: 1,919

Mar 26, 2010 -- 6:23PM, Truefan wrote:

when i first picked up 4e PHB (Origins i believe it was 2005 right after 4th was announced at Gencon) the first thing i noticed was the absence of greyhawk gods(like Obad-Hai), and the addition of Forgotten realms gods, (like corellon *sp)




Corellon was the canon deity of the elves in Greyhawk, as well, probably all the way back to 1E days.  He's in the 1E Deities and Demigods book.

The main gods of the non-human pantheons (Corellon, Moradin, Garl Glittergold, Yondalla, Gruumsh, etc.) were first detailed in that book, and were then supplemented with additional gods which were originally presented in Dragon Magazine articles in 1982.  Those non-human pantheons eventually became canon (with some additions and revisions) for both Greyhawk and the Forgotten Realms.

Mar 26, 2010 -- 6:23PM, Truefan wrote:

in previous editions the greyhawk gods were the standard




Not really.  Only from 3E forward has there been any "standard" pantheon.  In the 1E and 2E days, any mention of the Greyhawk pantheons (other than the demi-human deities) were limited to the setting-specific books.

With 3E, WotC decided to make Greyhawk the "default" setting for the game, though it received very little in the way of "fleshing-out" in the 3E/3.5 rulebooks.  With that, however, a subset of the Greyhawk deities were presented in the 3E/3.5 PHBs (the first time that deities were specifically listed in a PHB).  A broader listing of Greyhawk deities was also given in the 3E "Living Greyhawk Gazetteer" book.

As 3E/3.5 progressed, WotC then introduced some new deities to the "default" pantheon (particularly in the "Races" books), who were not from the original Greyhawk pantheon (they were entirely new creations, in fact).

With 4E, WotC has, instead, chosen to create a default pantheon which borrows from both Greyhawk (Kord, Pelor, Vecna) and the Forgotten Realms (Bane), as well the traditional non-human deities (Bahamut, Corellon, Moradin, Gruumsh, Lolth, Tiamat), in addition to adding a number of newly-created deities (e.g., Erathis, Raven Queen, etc.).

Mar 26, 2010 -- 6:23PM, Truefan wrote:

now, since forgotten realms has subverted greyhawk as a the standard




It may feel that way to you, but it really isn't....there really isn't a "default" campaign world, at least not one that has been substantially fleshed out.  If there's a default setting, it's the general idea of the "points of light" theme for the campaign world, but there isn't a specific world behind that.

The Realms may feel "standard" to you because of the existence of LFR as the RPGA's sole campaign...but, WotC hasn't released a FR-themed book in about a year.  The Realms was the first campaign setting which received 4E support (with hardcover books and softcover adventures); once they got those books out, it was Eberron's turn.  And now, Eberron's turn is ending, and it's Dark Sun's turn next.

Mar 26, 2010 -- 6:23PM, Truefan wrote:

i think they should release a greyhawk alternative core book, like they did for forgotten realms for so long (1988)




I'd love to see Greyhawk get some 4E love, but it doesn't seem like WotC has much, if any, interest in supporting the Greyhawk setting (and, honestly, that was the case through the 3E era, as well, the Living Greyhawk campaign notwithstanding).

"Of course [Richard] has a knife.  He always has a knife.  We all have knives.  It's 1183, and we're barbarians!" - Eleanor of Aquitaine, "The Lion in Winter"
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 28, 2010 - 3:54PM #85
Truefan
Date Joined: Feb 28, 2010
Posts: 16

thats my bad about Corellon, i was used to playing Ehlonna. so that was me not remembering correctly. based on Corellon not being in the GH GAZ. i realize that doesn't mean they

i agree about the fact that there are some standard gods without campaign restrictions, and its very cool they included most of these , you listed YOndalla, which unless its in a supplement is not in 4e, nor Forgotten Realms 3rd book,

it may be that i feel that the Deities switched from Greyhawk to Forgotten Realms because the twelve Deities removed are all Greyhawk deities, but are not recognized Forgotten Realms deities.
and of the twelve they added, one is a greyhawk deity, Lolth which is also a FR deity and five additional FR deities,  i realize now looking at it again its not a switch they are going for a more neutral seemingly removing GH references. so, i guess it just seems that way,since i miss Nerull St.Cuthbert and Wee Jas so much, to name a few. its impossible for anyone to look at things unbiased, ill admit that.

and im not trying to bash here... i like 90% of the changes they made in 4E. im just talking strictly Deities GH vs FR and their existence in core books (so yes OD&D and AD&D don't enter the conversation i should have Clarified that)




Mar 26, 2010 -- 6:23PM, Truefan wrote:

i think they should release a greyhawk alternative core book, like they did for forgotten realms for so long (1988)





I'd love to see Greyhawk get some 4E love, but it doesn't seem like WotC has much, if any, interest in supporting the Greyhawk setting (and, honestly, that was the case through the 3E era, as well, the Living Greyhawk campaign notwithstanding).




im looking forward to dark sun, i missed it when it first rolled around in Ad&D.  do you think there is a way to get Greyhawk revitalised? something i can do?

Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 28, 2010 - 5:49PM #86
kenobi65
  • Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined: May 6, 2001
Posts: 1,919

Mar 28, 2010 -- 3:54PM, Truefan wrote:

i agree about the fact that there are some standard gods without campaign restrictions, and its very cool they included most of these , you listed YOndalla, which unless its in a supplement is not in 4e, nor Forgotten Realms 3rd book,




I was referring to her, and the other non-human deities, in the context of how TSR and WotC handled those pantheons in the 1E/2E/3E eras.  She is, indeed, in the 3E Forgotten Realms (see the "Faiths and Pantheons" book), though it looks like she's been downsized out of the 4E FR pantheons. 

In the 4E FRCS book, Sheela Peryroyl is listed a goddess, and the other traditional halfling gods are listed as her exarchs (4E terminology for demigods).  My guess is that they saw Yondalla as being unnecessary, as she was very close in outlook, portfolio, and alignment to Chauntea (the main FR nature goddess).

Mar 28, 2010 -- 3:54PM, Truefan wrote:

do you think there is a way to get Greyhawk revitalised? something i can do?




There is a board here on the D&D boards for discussion of Greyhawk:
community.wizards.com/go/forum/view/7588...

That said, I'd be surprised if any WotC D&D staffers regularly visit that board (and it doesn't look like it gets a whole lot of traffic, anyway). 

I guess I'd suggest that you write to the D&D brand management team and let them know of your interest in seeing Greyhawk updated for 4E.  If WotC continues to follow the pattern they've established so far, they'll likely have a fourth game world which will receive support starting in 2011, though that hasn't been announced yet, and it's not clear if it'd be a world from a prior edition of the game, or a new one.

"Of course [Richard] has a knife.  He always has a knife.  We all have knives.  It's 1183, and we're barbarians!" - Eleanor of Aquitaine, "The Lion in Winter"
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 29, 2010 - 1:21AM #87
gomeztoo
Date Joined: May 11, 2005
Posts: 2,797
In 4th ed, Yondalla is an aspect of Chauntea (like Sehanine is of Selune, and Hanalil of Sune).
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 29, 2010 - 4:05AM #88
Keith53
Date Joined: Aug 21, 2007
Posts: 1,282
I expect at some point WotC will abandon the new campaign setting every year business model, as they go from the most popular to less popular or new and untried, the sales numbers are likely to get worse.  Usually companies are not fond of getting less return on their production.  TSR loved it and it helped to bankrupt them.

Keith
Keith Hoffman
LFR Writing Director for Waterdeep
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Mar 29, 2010 - 9:15AM #89
kenobi65
  • Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined: May 6, 2001
Posts: 1,919

Mar 29, 2010 -- 1:21AM, gomeztoo wrote:

In 4th ed, Yondalla is an aspect of Chauntea (like Sehanine is of Selune, and Hanalil of Sune).




That doesn't surprise me to learn (though I missed it in my cursory scan of the Deities section of the FRCS to answer truefan's question).

"Of course [Richard] has a knife.  He always has a knife.  We all have knives.  It's 1183, and we're barbarians!" - Eleanor of Aquitaine, "The Lion in Winter"
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 years ago  ::  Apr 20, 2010 - 11:21AM #90
Anthraxus
Date Joined: Sep 21, 2004
Posts: 35
I'm bumping this up again, in hopes that someone who's a better organizer and writer than me is doing this for submission into a future Dragon magazine. Tongue out

Edit: And by "this", I mean an article with domains for the lesser deities and exarchs.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 9 of 9  •  Prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing