|
3 years ago ::
Feb 17, 2010 - 9:21AM
#111
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2002
|
Its attack is +9/1d12+3 x2, 1d6 quarry, +2d12 crit. With the -5 for darkness and the dragon's AC 23, the ranger is looking for 19s and 20s. For an average of about 4.5 damage per round (mostly varying between 34 damage hits and 13 damage ones, with an awful lot of misses). The other people with longbow's in the group are doing, say, 1d10+2 damage and need non-critting 20s to hit, for an average of .75 per round added for both of them. Or 5.25 per round against a 296 hp critter, or 56 rounds of combat. If nothing goes wrong.
Those numbers aren't quite accurate: Merely it being night doesn't make things dark. It makes it low-light, which is likely not a problem for the Ranger. The Ranger also should likely have a +12, not a +9(starting Dex of +4, +2 for bow, +2 for level, +2 for +2 vicious greatbow, +1 for prime shot, +1 for weapon expertise = +12). That turns that 19 into an 11.
High-Str characters have likely invested in a +1 Distance Javelin(360 gp). If the Dragon is in bright light, they no longer need a 20 to hit it, likely more around a 16 or so. And if a Fighter is marking that Dragon, then it has a penalty to hit.
Even though the Dragon is at 22 away, there are multiple ways to get that sunrod up 2 squares so as to illuminate it. Mage Hand, standing on shoulders, having the guys without low-light ready for someone tossing it 3 squares into the air and shooting when the Dragon is illuminated, etc...
If you run the numbers, the Dragon likely dies in that situation before he can really drop that Ranger.
NETH4-1 Containing Shadow (co-author) Handbooks
Show
Builds
Show
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 17, 2010 - 1:05PM
#112
|
- Senior Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2007
|
Darn it. Teach me to do math while sick. Hmm. Only off by +3 though (forgot prime shot entirely, as well as one of the +2s), so if the darkness matters then it's still a 16. That still makes the ranger lose, but it's a _lot_ closer.
I'm a bit dubious on the numbers on 5th level characters who have +1 distance javelins, myself. A lot of those guys are saving up for iron armbands or just transfer over a different +1 (lightning, etc) or +2 weapon when they get a +3. I don't think I've seen one yet at that level.
Anyhow, broke out a spreadsheet instead of using my head, and fixed the stats. It's a lot closer now.
And, obviously, if you take the darkness (or, I suppose, cloud cover) variable out of the equation (which I didn't, since it was stipulated by the poster) then it gets a lot easier for the party.
Keith Richmond Living Forgotten Realms Epic Writing Director
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 17, 2010 - 1:22PM
#113
|
Date Joined:
Apr 25, 2002
|
Darn it. Teach me to do math while sick. Hmm. Only off by +3 though (forgot prime shot entirely, as well as one of the +2s), so if the darkness matters then it's still a 16. That still makes the ranger lose, but it's a _lot_ closer.
I'm a bit dubious on the numbers on 5th level characters who have +1 distance javelins, myself. A lot of those guys are saving up for iron armbands. I don't think I've seen one yet at that level.
A distance javelin is 360 gp, returns to your hand, and if you don't buy a regular javelin or longbow at 1st level, it is partially paid for 
But the darkness part is what's really key about the scenario. You need the writer saying that the night is moonless, the party can't get a light source into the air two squares up and the DM saying that the Dragon decides to hover at 22 squares away. That's a lot things that need to go together.
NETH4-1 Containing Shadow (co-author) Handbooks
Show
Builds
Show
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 17, 2010 - 6:11PM
#114
|
- Senior Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2007
|
Oh, distance javelins are a very very good thing. I've just never seen one by 5th level. I'm sure some people have them. I'm just a little dubious how common they are.
And yeah, the entire thing requires the darkness thing. At least if there's a ranger. Without the ranger they're in worse shape. And no matter what it's pretty boring.
Keith Richmond Living Forgotten Realms Epic Writing Director
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 18, 2010 - 4:11PM
#115
|
Date Joined:
Mar 16, 2006
|
And yeah, the entire thing requires the darkness thing. At least if there's a ranger. Without the ranger they're in worse shape. And no matter what it's pretty boring.
There should be no real problem getting a light up in the air. At the absolute worst, one character can throw it up and the rest ready to shoot when they see it up there. Any character with a flying familiar has an obvious strategy. If there's any sort of tree around, someone is almost certain to be able to TP or climb it and get the light visible.
Basic attacks will be a grind, yes. But the combat will actual be pretty fast. Roll all attacks simultaneously, subtract damage, repeat. Maybe 30 seconds for a round. Once you get it bloodied, it'll probable work out that this strategy is not working and quit or do something else.
But the bottom line is that this is a boring combat, and so the reason not to include it is not that it's a TPK -- it shouldn't be -- but that it's boring.
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 18, 2010 - 6:55PM
#116
|
- Senior Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2007
|
There should be no real problem getting a light up in the air. At the absolute worst, one character can throw it up and the rest ready to shoot when they see it up there. Any character with a flying familiar has an obvious strategy. If there's any sort of tree around, someone is almost certain to be able to TP or climb it and get the light visible.
Well, I think there being darkness at all is a bit of a gimmick. A flying familiar can be very quickly killed. A tree just means the dragon is at least 21 squares away horizontally from the tree as well. The throwing the light up and readying option is more interesting at least 
Keith Richmond Living Forgotten Realms Epic Writing Director
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 18, 2010 - 7:47PM
#117
|
|
|
There should be no real problem getting a light up in the air. At the absolute worst, one character can throw it up and the rest ready to shoot when they see it up there.
So you know, I'm now picturing Daen (my warlord, with whom Graham plays often) juggling three lit sunrods, throwing them as high up as he can, so the rest of you can shoot the stupid dragon.
"Of course [Richard] has a knife. He always has a knife. We all have knives. It's 1183, and we're barbarians!" - Eleanor of Aquitaine, "The Lion in Winter"
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 19, 2010 - 6:55AM
#118
|
- Senior Volunteer Community Lead
Date Joined:
Aug 19, 2007
|
Yeah, I think juggling sunrods is totally the cool answer to that riddle. Still a stupid combat, but definitely the proper response  Aside: young blue dragons are a little silly. Built as an artillery with long range options, but their 'claw/claw/bite' equivalent is still where it's at. At least until high level when they get to stun everyone for half the combat by thunderclapping over and over and over and over.
Keith Richmond Living Forgotten Realms Epic Writing Director
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 19, 2010 - 7:00AM
#119
|
Date Joined:
Mar 29, 2001
|
Answer: Fire arrows with sunrods attached.
What, you don't carry arrows with sunrods already attached?
-karma
LFR Characters: Lady Tiana Elinden Kobori Silverwane - Drow Control Wizard Kro'tak Warscream - Orc Bard Fulcrum of Gond - Warforged Laser Cleric
|
|
|
|
3 years ago ::
Feb 19, 2010 - 11:07AM
#120
|
Date Joined:
Dec 23, 2009
|
Answer: Fire arrows with sunrods attached.
"You're aiming the arrow?" "Yes" "You're looking down the shaft at the target?" "Yes" "You're looking down the shaft that has a sunrod attached?" "Yes" "You're looking straight into the bright spot of a sunrod and making sure it's centered on your target?" "Yes". "A sunrod..." "Yes". (Sound of DM head beating against the table...)
|
|
|