|
4 years ago ::
Jan 07, 2009 - 5:26AM
#51
|
|
|
What exactly are we discussing here?
The people at the RPGA are fully aware that if they do not get an adventure out at a promised date this is going to irritate event organizers. Most of the people at the RPGA organize events ourselves and we can relate to the problems that arise due such things.
The RPGA does its best to get an adventure out on time, but there are many factors involved in getting the adventures to the players. Despite the RPGA's best efforts sometimes the deadlines are not made regardless of the promises. Personally I think the record is not even that bad for LFR.
The RPGA is aware that early communications are better, but just as with publishing adventures, that is not always practical or possible, especially when we are talking about an extension of only a couple of days.
The fact is that you have the right to complain, but to be honest, it sounds a bit like complaining about the weather. It feels good, most people agree with it, but it is ultimately not going to have much of an impact. Personally, I just buy an umbrella for when it rains and always have a backup plan if an adventure is not available on time... and yes, I know that an umbrella doesn't work when it storms (game day/concention recruits most players who come just for that one missing event.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jan 07, 2009 - 8:50AM
#52
|
- Senior Volunteer Community Lead
- Dragon Slayer
- D&DI News Guide
Date Joined:
Aug 31, 2005
|
*nods* People have the right to complain, and sometimes those complaints even generate results - especially where the people/company being complained about aren't aware of the problem.
That, of course, is not the case here. The RPGA is/was aware of the problem, and got it fixed as soon as they could.
There's a fine line between complaining and "beating a dead horse".
[VCL]
Further, some of this thread is drifting woefully off-topic. I'd like to formally request that some of the more personal discussions and disagreements be taken out of this thread if they can't be stopped altogether.
I'd rather not be forced to lock the thread.
[/VCL]
Wolf Star76 Community Advocate (SVCL) for D&D Organized Play, Avalon Hill, and the DCI/WPN LFR Community Manager DDi Guide  Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Calorie Counter
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jan 07, 2009 - 11:15AM
#53
|
Date Joined:
Apr 29, 2008
|
Oddly enough, I can sanction SPEC1-1 it as a Home game or a Game Day, but it is not available to be sanctioned as a Retail game. Anyone else see this?
Also, any word on EAST1-3? I'm curious to see what the 7-10 mods are like.
This little signature is my official and insignificant protest to the (not so new now) community redesign.
The layout is lousy. The colour scheme burns the eyes. The wiki is a crippled monstrosity. So many posters have abandoned this site that some major forums are going days without posts. The 4e General Discussion board regularly has posts on the front page from two or even three days ago. This is pathetic.
Since I have to assume Wizards has a vested interest in an active community I wish someone in charge would fix this mess.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jan 07, 2009 - 12:50PM
#54
|
Date Joined:
Sep 17, 2006
|
Oddly enough, I can sanction SPEC1-1 it as a Home game or a Game Day, but it is not available to be sanctioned as a Retail game. Anyone else see this?
Also, any word on EAST1-3? I'm curious to see what the 7-10 mods are like.
I've heard the same thing. It can be set up as a con or a game day most of the time (from those I know who have tried scheduling it).
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jan 08, 2009 - 2:34PM
#55
|
Date Joined:
Feb 10, 2007
|
Oddly enough, I can sanction SPEC1-1 it as a Home game or a Game Day, but it is not available to be sanctioned as a Retail game. Anyone else see this?
Also, any word on EAST1-3? I'm curious to see what the 7-10 mods are like.
I can set it up as a Retail either, I like giving my store credit where we play for it I would hate to make a Game Day just to get the mod.
|
|
|
|
4 years ago ::
Jan 09, 2009 - 5:41PM
#56
|
Date Joined:
Aug 17, 2007
|
Is there errata for these?
I guess it's a bit to early for errata for this...
The first encounter has a low level that doesn't match the compendium. And one of the powers is more beneficial in to the bad guys than the high level. I can't be more specific without spoilers. But any advice?
I'm going to switch that one power between the two and keep the stats as they are instead of the one in the compendium.
|
|
|
