Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 8 of 32  •  Prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 32 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Teams Ruining 2 Hand Giant Games
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 1:19PM #71
angus426
Date Joined: Jun 17, 2008
Posts: 275

nushae wrote:

I agree. I've suggested it a few times as well. But I think there is this need to pretend a program is anything like a real place.


A big dark labyrinth with lots of rooms full of scary monsters to slay.... oh, wait, wrong game.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 1:22PM #72
Shadowchaser
Date Joined: Mar 10, 2002
Posts: 265

WotC_Mike wrote:

Well, as you may know, TSR went bankrupt, and one of the main reasons it did is that they tried to be everything to everybody. They tried to support too many different play styles and offered too many products which made too many smaller groups and ended with none of them profitable.

I know that now because I work here and learned about economics of scale, development and printing costs, and so on.

I'm still sad that we don't make Spelljammer stuff anymore but I finally had to admit, that while I was part of a fervent community, it only represented a small part of the whole.

I look forward to your thoughts on the multiple room suggestion and other similar resource-level ideas.

Thanks!


I agree that you can offer too many choices and dilute the groups into non-profitability, but you can also offer too few choices and drive customers away.

The players that argue for 2hg to be a team game in every sense of the word really are the minority. You can see it easily enough by all the complaints about players teamdecking.

That being said I want them to be able to play the way they want to play. I am just unwilling to let them force the rest of us to play their way.

The only solution to that problem that I see is two seperate rooms. Now if one room fails it fails. At least we get to see where the majority really are.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 1:46PM #73
Argumentative_Silence
  • Clan Advocate
Date Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 822
can anyone prove to us they are driving players away?

This seems like a line anyone can say and not have to back it up.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 2:36PM #74
RUNCH
Date Joined: Oct 5, 2005
Posts: 238
The following is all conjecture and blatant opinionation:

The two room idea is bad at this point in time, as there are too few players in the existing MP room as is. Also, I would like to point out that most decks being played in the current MP room are hardly tournament worthy. And, while the original opinion of this thread in particular is a limited view, it merits pointing out that "teamed" decks don't qualify as tournament tech either. Babying a small portion of the room won't get the desired effect.

Also, while it's in my mind, I want to address the OP's repeated comments about CerealKillaz in particular. Firstly, as we currently have 200+ (very) active members, and the MP room usually contains ~200 players, yes you will be playing against our members often. Secondly, we DO encourage team strategies. We even have a large population of members who are using our voice server during games. Do some of our members chat between games and post on our website about making teamed interlacing strategic decks? YES, yes this happens, a lot. That is why we have people joining our clan daily, to be part of a family of like minded players. We often sit at our own clannies tables and duke it out. How else are we going to get better? Playing random people with random decks? Not hardly. Yes, we play hard. Is that cheating in any way? Not hardly.

Gotta run for now, I'll check in later.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 3:03PM #75
Argumentative_Silence
  • Clan Advocate
Date Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 822
Runch these guys don't want teamed games in a teamed environment. Its a lot easier to build a janky deck and sit down to 3 other janky decks and duke it out. It takes time and energy to sit down and play with decks built together.

and THANK YOU for pointing out the absurdity in labeling any deck tourney worthy. When no one knows what would happen to the format if it was given the resources, and players to force an expansion out of the current metagame

Laziness wins out dude.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 3:20PM #76
PaleRider67
Date Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 19

RUNCH wrote:

Ok, your original post was about "teamed" play right? Now, maybe I'm reading into your latest post too much, but when you say "and some P he picked up", I'm inclined to think he sat with a "random" partner. AND, what does "mouth" have to do with the original debate? I'm not saying trash talk is good or bad, but it truly wasn't part of this discussion. Also, I'm willing to wager, you started whining like a 5 year old about their deck choices which led to their less than complimentary retorts. I have no info on this match, I'm just doing that horrible "assuming" thing based on what you've demonstrated on this thread.

Did you take the advice given here? By that I mean, did you make your own table and label it "no teamed or complimentary" decks, or "no counter, discard, LD, combo, T1 2 or 3, etc...."?

Again, I must suggest joining a clan of like minded players, that way you know that everyone involved will be playing on equal terms.

AND, as I've thought about this subject and discussed it with my peers, we agreed on a key idea regarding 2hg. It is the "random" players that are in the wrong. 2hg is a partnered format (i.e. teamed) and it's just now coming back to what it is supposed to be and not vice versa. I have to say your whole argument, especially based on your latest post, is more likely based on ineptitude and immaturity that on the actual team play you protest against. I would strongly suggest (besides joining a clan) you hang out in the new players room until you get a better feel for the game.

Good luck in your quest to become a Magic player.


First off, I never whine. Second your mother is a smelly goat's ballistica. Get my point there? His P, is the same guy he's been playing with for days now. When he started talking trash after it was clear he was going to win, he started running his mouth about how CK rules. Ok, a little gloating I can take, but this was riddiculaus. Look, its not just about CK, when some obviously 13 or 14 year kid starts running his mouth because he ran a team deck, it gets old. ck isn't the only ones who do this, but when I asked his captain's name, he laughed. I was actually playing with another CK member on my team, and even he was appauled at his behavior. He appologized up and down about this kid's behavior. He (the kid) has been blocked.

I'm 41, I've probably been playing magic since you were in diappers, so drop the all high and mighty routine. You don't have to be tea and cookies nice, but don't be a total choob. Because you're CK doesn't give you a license to be a jackazz, or does it? Do you get official jackazz cards with membership? Again, get my point? Muselix will be contacted btw.

All CK players have been banned by me. Lets see if I can find a game now.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 3:45PM #77
PaleRider67
Date Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 19
[FONT="Impact"] BAN CK[/FONT]

If you like playing them, ignore this message. If you don't like being team decked with a discard counter match (all they play btw), then ban them. When they are left playing the same old people over and over they will be happy.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 6:11PM #78
Argumentative_Silence
  • Clan Advocate
Date Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 822
whoops.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 7:07PM #79
bubba0077
  • Volunteer Community Lead
  • blame me for the weather
Date Joined: Feb 27, 2002
Posts: 10,028

PaleRider67 wrote:

If you like playing them, ignore this message. If you don't like being team decked with a discard counter match (all they play btw), then ban them. When they are left playing the same old people over and over they will be happy.


Once again:

RUNCH wrote:

Did you take the advice given here? By that I mean, did you make your own table and label it "no teamed or complimentary" decks, or "no counter, discard, LD, combo, T1 2 or 3, etc...."?

Again, I must suggest joining a clan of like minded players, that way you know that everyone involved will be playing on equal terms.


You have yet to say if you tried any of this. If you asked for certain types of play and people ignored you, you have a right to complain. Otherwise, you need to get over yourself and realize you do NOT set the rules for generally accepted multiplayer practices and reevaluate your expectations in the absence of any notes to the contrary.

Magic Online Volunteer Community Lead. • Also assisting the Paper Magic area for the time being.
I'm trying to make my official VCL posts in purple

You posted saying my thread was moved/locked but nothing happened.      Spoiler: Show
Unfortunately, VCLs do not currently have the tools necessary to take moderation actions directly. VCLs submit their actions to ORCs, who then actually perform the action. This processing can take between a few minutes and several hours, depending on how busy/attentive the ORCs are.


If you see something that needs VCL attention, please use this thread (MTGO) or this thread (paper) to make a request and a VCL will look at it as soon as possible.  CoC violations should be reported to Customer Service using the "report post" button. Please do not disrupt the thread by making requests of either kind in-thread.

General MTGO FAQ


Yes, the Shuffler is Random!
The definitive thread on the Magic Online shuffler.

Magic Math Made Easy
Draw probabilities, Swiss results, Elo ratings and booster EV

Event EV Calculator
Calculate the EV for any event with a fixed number of rounds and prizes based on record

Dual means two. A duel is a battle between two people. Lands that make two colors of mana are dual lands. A normal Magic battle is a duel.

Thanks to PhoenixLAU for the awesome avatar!

QuotablesSpoiler: Show
"While a picture is worth a thousand words, each lolcat actually produces a negative wordcount." -Ith

"I think "Highly Informed Sarcasm" should be our Magic Online General motto." -Ith

"Sorry, but this thread seems just like spam. TT is for off-topic discussion, not no-topic discussion."
-WizO_Kwai_Chang

"Stop that! If you're not careful, rational thinking may catch on!" -Sax

"... the only word i see that fits is incompitant." -Mr44 (sic)

"You know a thread is gonna be locked when it gets to the hexadecimal stage." -Gathion

"It's a good gig" - Gleemax

"I tell people often, if you guys want to rant, you've certainly got the right to (provided you obey CoC/ToS stuff), and I don't even really blame you. But if you see something you think needs changing a well thought-out, constructive post does more to make that happen." - Worth Wollpert
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 years ago  ::  Dec 05, 2008 - 7:55PM #80
Ambitious
  • I aim for a Custom Title.
Date Joined: Dec 22, 2005
Posts: 4,515
My take on all this:

On the rare (but not too rare) occasion I play multiplayer, I'm playing for the casual side of myself. The competitive side of me gets its fill in Classic 1-on-1 tournaments. In tournaments, where the primary objective is winning, I say that if your deck is losing to another deck the problem is not that the other deck is too good, it's that yours isn't good enough. (Unless literally every deck loses to that same other deck, but that's another point.)

Casual play, on the other hand, is where I go to escape the constant competition. When I'm trying to escape constantly having to build the best deck to beat the best decks, the last thing I want is for someone to come up with a deck leagues above the pile I throw together and demand that I beat it.

Interestingly, I get the impression that none of the decks that sharks in multiplayer rooms play are anywhere near the level of my Classic decks, but that's probably because more people in multiplayer play extended than Classic. If I was an ext tourney player, however, I'd have five or ten decks that are leagues above those of the sharks.

As for the other part of it, related to not wanting individual competitiveness I absolutely do not want people flaunting their clan affiliation in front of me. That is another form of competitiveness, and I left my competitiveness in the tourney room.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 8 of 32  •  Prev 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... 32 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing