Community

Feb 19, 2013 -- 4:45PM, Anubuss wrote:

The "Island's Style" RDW will always loose to similar decks, of only because your guys are bigger.  It's the nature of how decks function, in the similar deck match up, the deck that can go bigger usually wins.  If you're already running 4 Rancor, and the miser Wolf Run, Rampager doesn't seem to be needed.  Seems like it'd be just win more here.  I think I'd like to see 4 Lightning Mauler .  Turn 2 Emissary + Mauler, swing for 4 + your 1 drop seems good.  Shahar Shenhar ran a similar list and came out at 22nd place in standings.  Not a bad showing for an aggro deck at an event where everyone was expecting lots aggro.

Feb 19, 2013 -- 6:09PM, Hakeem928 wrote:

Concerning your sideboard comments, you remove both Ghor-Clan Rampager in 3/4 of those scenarios; seems to me like you should be main-decking something else. Two copies of Thunderous Wrath could be pretty sexy here.

You are both right. The Rampager is the weakest link and I know it - when I described it as "icing on the cake" that should have set the alarm bells off. So I will be replacing it.

Feb 19, 2013 -- 4:53PM, jnp5021 wrote:

Whoops. Totally blanked 2nd paragraph. Sorry long day. Surprised at no 4th hellrider. Seems really solid. If you can get to the finish line before turn 4 sweepers come out, should work wonders. Even then reach gets you home if you are close. Vs the other staple aggro decks, it seems at least 50/50 depending on pilot. Should hose midrange pretty well. The control MU seems a little hard without strangleroot and predator ooze to stave off spells. Not sure if you'll have enough speed to go through 20 points fast enough there. May seem silly, but something reactive like ranger's guile to stop some removal could be a cute trick. Solid over all.

Thanks for coming back with some solid advice. I didn't put in the 4th Hellrider   because of the mana count. The mana requirements for the 'root and the ooze are why I don't have them in this build. I was working on a rGDW, but I just couldn't get it going fast enough using Dryad Militant and Experiment One in the 1-drop slot. I've got some more testing to do with your ranger's guile   suggestion.  It does seem silly, but versus control aggro NEEDS silly and this type of trick might be good in the main deck as well.

Feb 19, 2013 -- 5:59PM, re4leonkennedy wrote:

Looks pretty good. I might do 1 more land, but that's probably just personal preference. I'm not sure about the sideboard plan of -4 rakdos crackler for 4 reckless waif. A flipped waif is only marginally better than crackler (3/2 vs 2/2) and you're playing a deck that always plays a spell on your turn and often plays two spells. Reckless waif is only good if it flips and never flips back. That doesn't happen enough for me to take out a 1 mana grizzly bears for it.

I only side her in versus control or slower decks that are not casting spells every turn, especially on their own turns (leaving their mana open to react to me) - so she flips. If I cast two spells during my turn (or my controlling opponent does) then she does not flip back over until the end of the turn. Then during the opponent's turn they HAVE to cast a spell to keep her from flipping back - I like to control the control player whenever I can - if they don't cast then she flips back over just in time for your turn. If not, she's a chump blocker. She remains a viable option throughout the entire (long) game. In the control match up I am sad to draw a cackler after about Turn 3 when they lose out to bigger dudes or they need to come down as a 1/1 so I can chump block with them. All that being said, I think Reckless Waif is one of the weakest members of the sideboard - I just don't see what I would replace her with because I'm thinking about main decking the Ranger's Guile combat trick.
Now I need to do some testing. Any more suggestions anyone?