Community

 
Magic: The Gathering Standard Deck Help Ok, i'm working on a new deck, I really don't...
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Switch to Forum Live View Ok, i'm working on a new deck, I really don't know what it would be called. Here it goes, I...
3 months ago  ::  Feb 17, 2013 - 6:09AM #1
maltross
Date Joined: Dec 30, 2012
Posts: 18
Ok, i'm working on a new deck, I really don't know what it would be called. Here it goes, I welcome any insight and suggestions.









         3 Boros Reckoner

         3  Stuffy Doll

         4 Farseek

         3 Searing Spear

         3 Pillar Of Flame

         3 Brimstone Volley

         3 Guttersnipe

         1 Pithing Needle

         2 Blasphemous Act

         3 Giant Growth

         2 Past In Flames

         4 Burning Tree Shaman

         3 Burning Vengeance

         3 Fog

   
   
        height="100" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 17, 2013 - 12:12PM #2
maltross
Date Joined: Dec 30, 2012
Posts: 18
Sorry, I was really half asleep when I posted this after working all night. It's main goal is to get some guttersnipes on the board, with burning vengeance, cast some dmg, rinse and repeat. Maybe stuffy doll them or reckoner for fun.

   
   
        height="100" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 19, 2013 - 5:36AM #3
maltross
Date Joined: Dec 30, 2012
Posts: 18
Nobody? lol

   
   
        height="100" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 19, 2013 - 6:54AM #4
Black_Egg
Date Joined: Apr 19, 2008
Posts: 2,317
I'm not sure where you are going with this. I see Burning Vengeance , so it makes me think that you are planning a flashback deck (one I think that WotC intended but that never really happened). Then I see very few flashback spells, however. Past in Flames is definitely not enough to justify the presence of the previous enchantment.

If I ignore all that, it looks like a burn deck with some Fog effects, but even then, we have some Burning-Tree Emissary that don't seem to be relevant to your game plan. What is your plan?
D&D rules were never meant to exist without the presence of a DM. RAW is a lie.
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 19, 2013 - 6:58AM #5
LamiatZilt
Date Joined: Oct 3, 2012
Posts: 91
Sup with the Giant Growth?
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 20, 2013 - 6:18AM #6
maltross
Date Joined: Dec 30, 2012
Posts: 18
mainly some control until I can get some stuffy dolls and/or Reckoner out, Blashpemous act for games. Guttersnipe is there so I can ping my opponent while doing it. It actually worked out a few times. The past in flames/burning vengeance combo works pretty good, but I might take the advice and replace it with some stuff.

   
   
        height="100" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 20, 2013 - 6:19AM #7
maltross
Date Joined: Dec 30, 2012
Posts: 18
Burning tree shaman is a chump blocker, so i can cast him and burn off an opponent or farseek with the mana in the same turn. I think any g/r deck should be playing this guy.

   
   
        height="100" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
Quick Reply
Cancel
3 months ago  ::  Feb 20, 2013 - 6:22AM #8
maltross
Date Joined: Dec 30, 2012
Posts: 18
and the giant growth isn't in anymore. It was mainly so the guttersnipe couldn't be speared and such.

   
   
        height="100" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />
Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
Magic: The Gathering Standard Deck Help Ok, i'm working on a new deck, I really don't...
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing