|
5 months ago ::
Feb 09, 2013 - 10:20AM
#21
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2007
|
@Fezzhead: My understanding of the rules says that if someone were to filter all the cards through a Mimic Vat that none of those cards would be returned to the field because they are new game objects.
However, reading through rules 108 and 109 I can't find any proof of this and those rules appear to give a contrary answer to this understanding. 109.2a If a spell or ability uses a description of an object that includes the word “card” and the name of a zone, it means a card matching that description in the stated zone.
The card cycled through Mimic Vat didn't get moved from the battlefield, it got moved from exile. As such, it doesn't match the description. It was a different card that got moved from the battelfield. Don't forget that card is a type of object, so 400.7 applies here.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Feb 10, 2013 - 4:26PM
#22
|
Date Joined:
Oct 15, 2009
|
I'm not sure what you mean here. Any card that was exiled by Mimic Vat and then put back into the graveyard wouldn't fit the criteria of "creature card in a graveyard put there from the battlefield this turn" because it was put there from exile.
But Mimic Vat uses a triggered ability to exile the creature from the graveyard. So there does exist a time whan that card is in the graveyard, and arrived there from the battlefield. So my question is why isn't a card in my graveyard which had previously been put there from the battlefield not "a card put into my graveyard from the battlefield"?
It was a different card that got moved from the battelfield. Don't forget that card is a type of object, so 400.7 applies here.
I don't buy this. It is most definitely the same card, and I can offer any number of different ways to prove that.
 Rules Advisor as of 03/01/2013 Zammm = Batman "Ability words are flavor text for Melvins." -- Fallingman
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Feb 10, 2013 - 4:41PM
#23
|
Date Joined:
Dec 13, 2011
|
It was a different card that got moved from the battelfield. Don't forget that card is a type of object, so 400.7 applies here.
I don't buy this. It is most definitely the same card, and I can offer any number of different ways to prove that.
Well, here are the only ways that matter:
400.7. An object that moves from one zone to another becomes a new object with no memory of, or relation to, its previous existence. There are seven exceptions to this rule: 400.7a Effects from spells, activated abilities, and triggered abilities that change the characteristics of a permanent spell on the stack continue to apply to the permanent that spell becomes. ( Second Sunrise doesn't affects permanents or spells.) 400.7b Prevention effects that apply to damage from a permanent spell on the stack continue to apply to damage from the permanent that spell becomes. (Second Sunrise doesn't deal damage.) 400.7c If an ability of a permanent requires information about choices made as that permanent was cast as a spell, including what mana was spent to cast that spell, it uses information about the spell that became that permanent as it resolved. (Second Sunrise doesn't have any choices to make.) 400.7d Abilities that trigger when an object moves from one zone to another (for example, "When Rancor is put into a graveyard from the battlefield") can find the new object that it became in the zone it moved to when the ability triggered, if that zone is a public zone. (Second Sunrise isn't a triggered ability.) 400.7e Abilities of Auras that trigger when the enchanted permanent leaves the battlefield can find the new object that Aura became in its owner’s graveyard if it was put into that graveyard at the same time the enchanted permanent left the battlefield. It can also find the new object that Aura became in its owner’s graveyard as a result of being put there as a state-based action for not being attached to a permanent. (See rule 704.5n.) (Second Sunrise isn't an Aura.) 400.7f If an effect grants a nonland card an ability that allows it to be cast, that ability will continue to apply to the new object that card became after it moved to the stack as a result of being cast this way. (Second Sunrise doesn't let you cast anything.) 400.7g A resolving spell or activated ability can perform actions on an object that moved from one zone to another while that spell was being cast or that ability was being activated, if that object moved to a public zone. (The cards in your graveyard got there long before Second Sunrise was cast.)
Since none of the exceptions apply, the object represented by the physical creature card has no relation to the object that was previously represented by that same card.
Rules Advisor
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Feb 10, 2013 - 4:47PM
#24
|
Date Joined:
Oct 15, 2009
|
Then how are we answering the OP's question?
 Rules Advisor as of 03/01/2013 Zammm = Batman "Ability words are flavor text for Melvins." -- Fallingman
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Feb 10, 2013 - 5:51PM
#25
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2007
|
It was a different card that got moved from the battelfield. Don't forget that card is a type of object, so 400.7 applies here.
I don't buy this. It is most definitely the same card, and I can offer any number of different ways to prove that.
It might be the same physical card, but MTG doesn't care about that. It only cares about game objects. That card is different object than the card it was in exile, which was a different object than the card it was in the graveyard, which was a different object than the permanent it was on the battlefield.
"No it's not" is not a valid argument. "I have proof" is not a valid argument. You'll have to do much better than that if you want to convince anyone. Start "offering".
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Feb 10, 2013 - 5:53PM
#26
|
Date Joined:
Oct 29, 2007
|
but MTG doesn't care about that.
As written, 109.2a definitely says it cares about cards.
It likely should say a currently existing object represented by that card instead of just a card.
MtG Rules Advisor & Goth/Industrial/EBM/Indie/Alternative/80's-Wave DJDJ VortexDCI Certified Rules Advisor from July 14, 2009 to July 14, 2012 DCI #5209514320 Wit found in Rules Q&ARPJesus: "Man, screw the rules, I'll play a game of 2HG Archenemy Planechase Emperor EDH draft yet. Once I figure out the rules for it..." Chaikov: "Of course, casual Magic may be played any way your Pokemon group agrees on..." and "It's not logic. It's Magic!" GainsBanding: "I only play online. The Magic Online shuffler is AWESOME!" Ikegami: "one might think [adult cats] would make excellent tokens. The issue, though, is that they are very hard to exile. They return to the battlefield more often than an undying creature." Astarael7: "Does 121.1 imply that players are supposed to wear their poison counters?" Bimmerbot: "If you move the wrong way and [the poison counters] fall, it's a game rule violation" Helluminatus: "Just remember, if it looks like a duck, smells like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but the oracle text says creature - Bunny , then by god, it's a bunny." MadCow21: "Who are you and what have you done with the real Chaikov?" My Wife's Makeup Artist Page <-- cool stuff - check it out
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Feb 10, 2013 - 5:54PM
#27
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2007
|
Then how are we answering the OP's question?
As I explained, Second Sunrise doesn't ask about any object other than those currently in the graveyard, so it doesn't matter that card become new objects when they change zone. It just asks what action created them, and they were obviously around when they got created!
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Feb 10, 2013 - 6:03PM
#28
|
Date Joined:
Nov 16, 2007
|
As written, 109.2a definitely says it cares about cards.
Cards, yes. Why do you 109.2a is talking about physical cards instead of cards? Look two rules higher.
109.1. An object is an ability on the stack, a card, a copy of a card, a token, a spell, a permanent, or an emblem.
It likely should say a currently existing object represented by that card instead of just a card.
Would it make sense for a rule, any rule, to use "a currently existing object represented by that permanent" instead of "permament"? No. So it makes no sense for it to do so for "card". They are both types of game objects.
|
|
|