Flag
CommanderGreven
•
January 31, 2013 8:00 AM PST
Todays other GTC card to rate is...
Arrows of Justice 
Spoiler:
Show
5.0: First pick no matter what. I will always play this card.
4.5: Splashable and first pick worthy.
4.0: First pick pack 1.
3.5: Early pick though not always a first pick.
3.0: Solid early/mid pick.
2.5: Solid pick in color.
2.0: Should generally make the deck if in this color.
1.5: Decent filler.
1.0: 23rd card if you have to.
0.5: This card will sometimes be sideboarded in.
0.0: I will never put this card into my deck (main deck or after sideboarding).
This card is good. I had one at the prerelease and it helped me a lot. It can kill almost anything that attacks or blocks and it's splashable.
3.5
Discuss!
Todays other GTC card to rate is... Arrows of Justice Spoiler:
Show
5.0: First pick no matter what. I will always play this card.4.5: Splashable and first pick worthy.4.0: First pick pack 1.3.5: Early pick t
Flag
Stuie66
•
January 31, 2013 8:16 AM PST
Conditional removal is still removal. I'd probably say 3.0.
Conditional removal is still removal. I'd probably say 3.0.
Flag
Lobster667
•
January 31, 2013 8:22 AM PST
Yeah this card is really sweet. I think 3.5 is warranted.
Yeah this card is really sweet. I think 3.5 is warranted.
Flag
I-rock
•
January 31, 2013 8:23 AM PST
Conditional removal is still removal. I'd probably say 3.0.
And as far as conditional removal is concerned, you couldn't ask for much more. 4 damage kills a lot in this set, and is pretty punishing. Considering that most any deck that runs R/W will be able to use it, I'll give it 3.0-3.5. I would pass a fair number of cards over this, and pretty much the only things I wouldn't would be Grisly Spectacle 
or legitimate bombs.
And as far as conditional removal is concerned, you couldn't ask for much more. 4 damage kills a lot in this set, and is pretty punishing. Considering that most any deck that runs R/W will be able to use it, I'll give it 3.0-3.5. I would pass a fa
Flag
silentbobus
•
January 31, 2013 8:42 AM PST
I would put this in the 3.0 range. But since it works for 3 guilds it'll probably get picked higher than other 3.0s.
I would put this in the 3.0 range. But since it works for 3 guilds it'll probably get picked higher than other 3.0s.
Flag
rstnme
•
January 31, 2013 8:44 AM PST
Was avenging arrow a 3.0? This is better than that. 3-3.5 for me.
Was avenging arrow a 3.0? This is better than that. 3-3.5 for me.
Flag
Lobster667
•
January 31, 2013 8:52 AM PST
Was avenging arrow a 3.0? This is better than that. 3-3.5 for me.
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).
Flag
rstnme
•
January 31, 2013 8:58 AM PST
Was avenging arrow a 3.0? This is better than that. 3-3.5 for me.
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).
Except I was referring to how Avenging Arrow was ranked as a 3.0 situational removal and wanted to point out this deserved to be ranked higher exactly because it's better...?
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).[/quote]Except I was referring to how Avenging Arrow was ranked as a 3.0 situational removal and wanted to point out this d
Flag
Lobster667
•
January 31, 2013 9:02 AM PST
Was avenging arrow a 3.0? This is better than that. 3-3.5 for me.
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).
Except I was referring to how Avenging Arrow was ranked as a 3.0 situational removal and wanted to point out this deserved to be ranked higher exactly because it's better...?
I agree (I gave this card 3.5).
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).[/quote]Except I was referring to how Avenging Arrow was ranked as a 3.0 situational removal and wanted to point out this d
Flag
EyeHunter
•
January 31, 2013 10:03 AM PST
3.5. This has always been great.
3.5. This has always been great.
Flag
HairlessThoctar
•
January 31, 2013 10:09 AM PST
Not only is it removal, but it's highly splashable removal.
4.5
Not only is it removal, but it's highly splashable removal.4.5
Flag
longwalrus
•
January 31, 2013 10:35 AM PST
clan defiance 
is a 4.5. This is nowhere near that power level. Don't get me wrong though, it's an early pick. 3 to 3.5.
clan defiance is a 4.5. This is nowhere near that power level. Don't get me wrong though, it's an early pick. 3 to 3.5.
Flag
Arioch22
•
January 31, 2013 11:52 AM PST
Yeah, real good removal that can easily be played in pretty much any deck.
3.0-3.5
Yeah, real good removal that can easily be played in pretty much any deck.3.0-3.5
Flag
Zokorad
•
January 31, 2013 2:43 PM PST
Happened at the Prerelease.
Opponent: Attack with Burning Tree Shaman.
Me: I take 2 go down to 3.
Opponent: Zhur-Twa Swine Bloodrush, you lose.
Me: Arrowss of Justice in response, no I don't
Happened at the Prerelease. Opponent: Attack with Burning Tree Shaman. Me: I take 2 go down to 3. Opponent: Zhur-Twa Swine Bloodrush, you lose. Me: Arrowss of Justice in response, no I don't
Flag
Catotheyounger
•
January 31, 2013 6:10 PM PST
Why is everyone rating 3 drop conditional
divine verdict 
so highly?
Why is everyone rating 3 drop conditional divine verdict so highly?
Flag
afrikanen
•
January 31, 2013 6:14 PM PST
Why is everyone rating 3 drop conditional divine verdict so highly?
3-drops are better than 4-drops.
Hybrid mana makes it easier to cast.
GTC has crappy removal, core sets have relatively good removal.
Those are my guesses.
This notwithstanding, I probably wouldn't rate it higher than 3, especially not if I'm playing Boros.
3-drops are better than 4-drops.Hybrid mana makes it easier to cast.GTC has crappy removal, core sets have relatively good removal.Those are my guesses.This notwithstanding, I probably wouldn't rate it higher than 3, especially not if I'm playing Bor
Flag
Urzasapprentice
•
January 31, 2013 9:07 PM PST
3.0 You guys are sick in the head = p Way to conditional to go higher
3.0 You guys are sick in the head = p Way to conditional to go higher
Flag
orin02
•
January 31, 2013 9:09 PM PST
3-3.5. It fits in a lot of guilds or is easily spashable.
3-3.5. It fits in a lot of guilds or is easily spashable.
Flag
MyPouf
•
February 1, 2013 2:22 AM PST
Was avenging arrow a 3.0? This is better than that. 3-3.5 for me.
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).
Except I was referring to how Avenging Arrow was ranked as a 3.0 situational removal and wanted to point out this deserved to be ranked higher exactly because it's better...?
I believe Avenging Arrow also got graded high because of the general lack of removals in RTR. I don't think it would get more than 2.5 in GTC.
I think 3-3.5 is fair enough.
I can easily see myself P1P2 this and even P1P1 in a mediocre pack.
Avenging Arrow is not a close comparison to this card (there's a big difference in killing something before and after it hits).[/quote]Except I was referring to how Avenging Arrow was ranked as a 3.0 situational removal and wanted to point out this d
