|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 10:18AM
#31
|
Date Joined:
Jan 22, 2005
|
I vote for Szat. He had the same basic idea as me, but I like his execution a bit better.
The flavor on his is fabulous. He was definitely my second choice.
Rules Adviser, casual tournament organizer, lover of EDH and MtG evangelist.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 12:16PM
#32
|
|
|
I don't really like any, but I guess I'd say Szat is the best imo.
As long as it's random, I really can't see where's the problem. Anyway, there's already a few standard ways for doing this. We listed them in this thread. If someone does the bogey-bogey, eats the cards, waits until they come out, look out the approximate order, place replacements in the same order, calls the president to ask him to give him a string of numbers, puts the card in the given order, then pick the cards in the order given by taking the date of birth of his opponent, reversed, and taking only every other number, then a judge can clearly declare that he's random enough.
The beauty of sarcasm is that when the person using it is totally incorrect, you can just remove the sarcasm and end up with a post that is actually correct.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 12:23PM
#33
|
|
|
My self, Because I am also shameless. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 4:00PM
#34
|
Date Joined:
Oct 12, 2010
|
Bay, you might want that to read
 : You may cast target creature exiled by Touch of the Eternal until end of turn.
instead, because you're not supposed to be able to put cards you don't own into your hand/library/graveyard.
Thanks for that. I might have wanted to say "own", but this works better.
Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.
----
Autocard is your friend.
[c]Lightning Bolt[/c] = Lightning Bolt 
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 8:30PM
#35
|
|
|
CL, with Dr D a really close second.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 8:50PM
#36
|
Date Joined:
Nov 30, 2012
|
Touch of the Eternal 
Enchantment-Aura Enchant creature Enchant creature is indestructible At the beginning of your upkeep, you gain life equal to enchanted creature's power If enchanted creature would be put into a graveyard from anywhere, instead exile it, than return it to play at the beginning of your next upkeep It keeps going, and going and going
Touch of the Eternal bespeaks, to me, one of the following:
- Gain lots of life
- Indestructibility
This card does both of those. Also, my apologies, but I really want the art to be the Energizer bunny.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 10:10PM
#37
|
|
|
With apologies to backpack (I'm genuinely not trying to be rude), when did people stop reading threads? That's the second entry after the round has closed.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 30, 2013 - 10:12PM
#38
|
- Unconventional Mafia Pro
- Dark Lord
Date Joined:
Jun 25, 2001
|
I vote for Dr. D -- I really liked his take on it.
"Enjoy your screams, Sarpadia - they will soon be muffled beneath snow and ice." THE COALITION WAR GAME-Phyrexian Praetor Round 1: (4-1-2, 1 kill) Round 2: (16-8-2, 4 kills) Round 3: (18-9-2, 1 kill) Round 4: (22-10-0, 2 kills) Round 5: (56-16-3, 9 kills) Round 6: (8-7-1) [current round] Last Edited by Ralph on blank, 1920
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 31, 2013 - 2:56AM
#39
|
Date Joined:
Feb 15, 2012
|
Vote: ChaosLight (Tevish_Szat second).
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 31, 2013 - 3:51AM
#40
|
Date Joined:
Jun 14, 2006
|
I liked candywife's take on a card named "touch of the eternal"
Don't be too smart to have fun
|
|
|
