Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Switch to Forum Live View Elder Modulation - Sorcery or Enchantment?
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 5:40PM #1
magicpablo666
Date Joined: May 19, 2012
Posts: 4,952
Elder Modulation
Enchantment
Each creature enters the battlefield with X +1/+1 counters on it, where X is its power added to its toughness and then divided by two rounded up. Then each creature becomes a 0/0.

Or

Elder Modulation
Sorcery
Each creature gains X +1/+1 counters, where X is its power added to its toughness and then divided by two rounded up. Then each creature with a +1/+1 counter on it becomes a 0/0. (This effect lasts indefinitely.)




Also, can I just say "where X is the average of its power and toughness?" So my main question is, does this work better as a sorcery or as an enchantment? And is the enchantment OP in eternal formats? Not vintage, but perhaps Legacy? And of course I'm even more worried about Modern. . .

May 25, 2013 -- 12:31PM, HairlessThoctar wrote:

Pablo's threads are like a college philosophy class.
Except instead of lecturing, everyone's getting blotto.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 5:42PM #2
ChaosLight
Date Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 14,447
O_____0
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 9:43PM #3
KeeperofManyNames
Date Joined: Dec 12, 2008
Posts: 10,458

Jan 18, 2013 -- 9:02PM, Cyranium wrote:

Jan 18, 2013 -- 5:40PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

Elder Modulation
Enchantment
Each creature enters the battlefield with X +1/+1 counters on it, where X is its power added to its toughness and then divided by two rounded up. Then each creature becomes a 0/0.

Or

Elder Modulation
Sorcery
Each creature gains X +1/+1 counters, where X is its power added to its toughness and then divided by two rounded up. Then each creature with a +1/+1 counter on it becomes a 0/0. (This effect lasts indefinitely.)




Also, can I just say "where X is the average of its power and toughness?" So my main question is, does this work better as a sorcery or as an enchantment? And is the enchantment OP in eternal formats? Not vintage, but perhaps Legacy? And of course I'm even more worried about Modern. . .




So what you're saying is that after the creature gains its 2 +1/+1 counters, all creatures become a 0/0? That's just like saying 'Destroy all creatures'


No, he's saying that you take the average, and then the power and toughness become the average, but to show that he has to reduce the NORMAL power and toughness to compensate for the counters.

I have no idea whether that works. I think maybe it has something to do with like stacking order or priority or what happens when you turn Humility into a creature or SOMETHING, but that's what he's going for.



...But surely it could just be written as "For each creature, take the average of their power and toughness rounded up. That creature becomes x/x where x is that average." Or maybe something even simpler. I don't think you need to explain how to take an average.

Coming Soon to the Magic: Expanded Multiverse:
FRAGMENTS: A Shards of Alara Anthology
(Click through to view the cover and announcement page)Want to get your work in the Expanded Multiverse? Come join the project!

Oh, and check out my blog, Storming the Ivory Tower: making sense of academia, media, and culture twice weekly.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 19, 2013 - 5:25AM #4
Mown
Date Joined: Apr 28, 2008
Posts: 16,714
What about just using one of the values and not caring about diving and such?

Jan 18, 2012 -- 3:34AM, Imidazoline wrote:

Everything Mown does is elegant.


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 19, 2013 - 8:18PM #5
TPmanW
Date Joined: Oct 24, 2010
Posts: 2,236

Jan 18, 2013 -- 9:43PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

Jan 18, 2013 -- 9:02PM, Cyranium wrote:

Jan 18, 2013 -- 5:40PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

Elder Modulation
Enchantment
Each creature enters the battlefield with X +1/+1 counters on it, where X is its power added to its toughness and then divided by two rounded up. Then each creature becomes a 0/0.

Or

Elder Modulation
Sorcery
Each creature gains X +1/+1 counters, where X is its power added to its toughness and then divided by two rounded up. Then each creature with a +1/+1 counter on it becomes a 0/0. (This effect lasts indefinitely.)




Also, can I just say "where X is the average of its power and toughness?" So my main question is, does this work better as a sorcery or as an enchantment? And is the enchantment OP in eternal formats? Not vintage, but perhaps Legacy? And of course I'm even more worried about Modern. . .




So what you're saying is that after the creature gains its 2 +1/+1 counters, all creatures become a 0/0? That's just like saying 'Destroy all creatures'


No, he's saying that you take the average, and then the power and toughness become the average, but to show that he has to reduce the NORMAL power and toughness to compensate for the counters.

I have no idea whether that works. I think maybe it has something to do with like stacking order or priority or what happens when you turn Humility into a creature or SOMETHING, but that's what he's going for.



...But surely it could just be written as "For each creature, take the average of their power and toughness rounded up. That creature becomes x/x where x is that average." Or maybe something even simpler. I don't think you need to explain how to take an average.



You're both missing a key aspect of the card. It only affects creture that haven't etb'd yet so it doesn't act as a board wipe on creatures. Since it triggers off of etb and the affect isn't just constantly "on"
Never mind, I reread the card. The first one makes everything a 0/0 which kills everything without a counter on it. The second version only effects creatures with counters on them so I assume the first card's wrath capabilities are the result of a typo? You also don't need the "then" in that last line of text. It doesn't make grammatical sense, the cards etb wth counter already on them so there's no need to delay the 0/0 affect to prevent them from dying and it enables weird combos with things like Warstorm Surge .
Either way I like the enchantment version better (in concept if not execution) since it's always around to remind you of the effect.
Have you considered an aura version of this?

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 20, 2013 - 3:27AM #6
Mown
Date Joined: Apr 28, 2008
Posts: 16,714
That's a monogreen wrath.
It's also very likely that it tries to check it's new p/t, which you just made 0.

Edit: As a response to GM's deleted post.

Jan 18, 2012 -- 3:34AM, Imidazoline wrote:

Everything Mown does is elegant.


Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 20, 2013 - 5:48AM #7
GM_Champion
Date Joined: Oct 10, 2011
Posts: 2,795

Jan 19, 2013 -- 9:13PM, GM_Champion wrote:

Here,

Each creature enters the battlefield as a 0/0 with a number of +1/+1 counters on it equal to half its original combined power and toughness, rounded up.





Fixed.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 20, 2013 - 1:25PM #8
bay_falconer
Date Joined: Oct 12, 2010
Posts: 9,710

Jan 18, 2013 -- 9:02PM, Cyranium wrote:

So what you're saying is that after the creature gains its 2 +1/+1 counters, all creatures become a 0/0? That's just like saying 'Destroy all creatures'




Allow me to introduce you to layers. Say I have a Curse of Death's Hold on you. And I have Vati il-Dal in play. Provided a creature doesn't have anything else giving it +0/+X, I can now use Vhati's ability to reduce a creature's toughness to 1, which is on a lower layer than the Curse's -1/-1, so the -1/-1 is subsequently applied, killing your guy. ( Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite works the same way.) Cool, huh? Of course, if you had a Glorious Anthem instead of me having a Curse on you, Vhati would make your creature an X/2.

So a 0/0 with two +1/+1 counters on it will always be a 2/2.

For added fun, try this with Tree of Redemption . Seriously.

Jun 27, 2012 -- 12:04AM, GM_Champion wrote:

Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.


----
Autocard is your friend.

[c]Lightning Bolt[/c]
= Lightning Bolt
Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing