Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 8:07AM #1
LunaStik
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2010
Posts: 1,073
Ravenous Raven
Creature - Bird
Flying
At the beginning of each upkeep, sacrifice another creature. If you do, put a +1/+1 counter on ~. Otherwise, sacrifice ~.
0/1

Jun 24, 2012 -- 9:44AM, Dilleux_Lepaire wrote:



As long as it's random, I really can't see where's the problem. Anyway, there's already a few standard ways for doing this. We listed them in this thread. If someone does the bogey-bogey, eats the cards, waits until they come out, look out the approximate order, place replacements in the same order, calls the president to ask him to give him a string of numbers, puts the card in the given order, then pick the cards in the order given by taking the date of birth of his opponent, reversed, and taking only every other number, then a judge can clearly declare that he's random enough.


Jan 20, 2013 -- 7:03AM, Dragon_Nut wrote:


The beauty of sarcasm is that when the person using it is totally incorrect, you can just remove the sarcasm and end up with a post that is actually correct.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 8:25AM #2
AzureShade
Date Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Posts: 3,797
I think this may be too down-sidey to play....

Dec 18, 2012 -- 7:05PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 8:40AM #3
LunaStik
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2010
Posts: 1,073
All the drawbacks are there because I was slightly worried it might have been too powerful, but now that I think on it, each upkeep makes it pretty tough to keep up with the costs to ebgin with (can't really be played until turn 3). removing the for each clause.

Jun 24, 2012 -- 9:44AM, Dilleux_Lepaire wrote:



As long as it's random, I really can't see where's the problem. Anyway, there's already a few standard ways for doing this. We listed them in this thread. If someone does the bogey-bogey, eats the cards, waits until they come out, look out the approximate order, place replacements in the same order, calls the president to ask him to give him a string of numbers, puts the card in the given order, then pick the cards in the order given by taking the date of birth of his opponent, reversed, and taking only every other number, then a judge can clearly declare that he's random enough.


Jan 20, 2013 -- 7:03AM, Dragon_Nut wrote:


The beauty of sarcasm is that when the person using it is totally incorrect, you can just remove the sarcasm and end up with a post that is actually correct.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 9:22AM #4
Mata_Hari
Date Joined: Jul 5, 2008
Posts: 6,710
Ravens can fly??
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 9:34AM #5
LunaStik
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2010
Posts: 1,073
Doh!

Jun 24, 2012 -- 9:44AM, Dilleux_Lepaire wrote:



As long as it's random, I really can't see where's the problem. Anyway, there's already a few standard ways for doing this. We listed them in this thread. If someone does the bogey-bogey, eats the cards, waits until they come out, look out the approximate order, place replacements in the same order, calls the president to ask him to give him a string of numbers, puts the card in the given order, then pick the cards in the order given by taking the date of birth of his opponent, reversed, and taking only every other number, then a judge can clearly declare that he's random enough.


Jan 20, 2013 -- 7:03AM, Dragon_Nut wrote:


The beauty of sarcasm is that when the person using it is totally incorrect, you can just remove the sarcasm and end up with a post that is actually correct.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 9:46AM #6
Kingreaper
Date Joined: Jun 3, 2010
Posts: 1,612
I'm not sure it's actually more powerful now. original version didn't have to sacrifice for the first counter, so this breaks even when it gets its 4th counter.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 9:48AM #7
ChaosLight
Date Joined: Aug 28, 2008
Posts: 14,448
Ravens tend to eat minds, not beasts.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 10:43AM #8
AzureShade
Date Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Posts: 3,797

Jan 18, 2013 -- 9:48AM, ChaosLight wrote:

Ravens tend to eat minds, not beasts.


Yes, this would be cooler if it ate cards from the hand.

Dec 18, 2012 -- 7:05PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 10:54AM #9
bay_falconer
Date Joined: Oct 12, 2010
Posts: 9,710

Jan 18, 2013 -- 9:48AM, ChaosLight wrote:

Ravens tend to eat minds, not beasts.




Only if you're still mourning your dead girlfriend Lenore.

Jun 27, 2012 -- 12:04AM, GM_Champion wrote:

Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.


----
Autocard is your friend.

[c]Lightning Bolt[/c]
= Lightning Bolt
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 18, 2013 - 1:22PM #10
RavenoftheBlack
Date Joined: Nov 28, 2007
Posts: 1,756
I'm hungry...
Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing