Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 2  •  Prev 1 2
Switch to Forum Live View question on security blockade..
5 months ago  ::  Jan 17, 2013 - 5:36AM #11
2goth4U
Date Joined: Oct 29, 2007
Posts: 9,306

Jan 17, 2013 -- 12:29AM, zammm wrote:

Lighten up, Feigel.


ROFLMAO

We are Feigel. Resistance is futile. You will be educated.

MtG Rules Advisor &
Goth/Industrial/EBM/Indie/Alternative/80's-Wave DJ

DJ Vortex

DCI Certified Rules Advisor from July 14, 2009 to July 14, 2012
DCI #5209514320

Wit found in Rules Q&A

RPJesus: "Man, screw the rules, I'll play a game of 2HG Archenemy Planechase Emperor EDH draft yet. Once I figure out the rules for it..."
Chaikov: "Of course, casual Magic may be played any way your Pokemon group agrees on..." and "It's not logic. It's Magic!"
GainsBanding: "I only play online.  The Magic Online shuffler is AWESOME!"
Ikegami: "one might think [adult cats] would make excellent tokens. The issue, though, is that they are very hard to exile. They return to the battlefield more often than an undying creature."
Astarael7: "Does 121.1 imply that players are supposed to wear their poison counters?"
Bimmerbot: "If you move the wrong way and [the poison counters] fall, it's a game rule violation"
Helluminatus: "Just remember, if it looks like a duck, smells like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but the oracle text says creature - Bunny , then by god, it's a bunny."
MadCow21: "Who are you and what have you done with the real Chaikov?"

My Wife's Makeup Artist Page <-- cool stuff - check it out
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 17, 2013 - 5:53AM #12
Chaikov
Date Joined: Jun 21, 2006
Posts: 5,831
Is this real or a joke? Is Ikegami actually the same person as Feigel?
It certainly is possible: Feigel was quite arrogant and possibly had had his account cancelled by the Forum mediators...  
«Dystocracy : A system of government in which corrupt leadership colludes with dishonest bankers and greedy elites in order to ensure that productive members of society –people who actually do useful work- bear the greatest share of taxes while gaining the least benefit possible.»

Sounds familiar?
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 17, 2013 - 6:18AM #13
kbcoder
Date Joined: Feb 11, 2010
Posts: 19
I apologize for not 'wording' things properly for some. Being new to the game makes it difficult to be 'pomagically' correct.   Didn't mean to start a discussion on terms. I do however want to thank all the responses, we had a fun time last night playing and learning. Being able to ask a couple questions on rules here and getting such fast feedback is enourmously helpfull.


Thanks!
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 17, 2013 - 6:39AM #14
Enigma256
Date Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Posts: 13,868
Magicese is a precise language, there is a difference between "blocked" and "blocked by a creature" for example

but ikegami takes it way too serious, so ignore him when he goes on about semantics, we all try to
proud member of the 2011 community team
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 17, 2013 - 7:44AM #15
Bowshewicz
Date Joined: Apr 12, 2012
Posts: 1,665
You can certainly play a creature card. For examples, see Scout's Warning and Ward of Bones .

You can even play creatures: Check the oracle text on Uphill Battle .

But those three were the only exceptions that I could find. ikegami is right to say that the preferred term is "cast."
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 17, 2013 - 8:32AM #16
LunaStik
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2010
Posts: 1,073

Jan 17, 2013 -- 7:44AM, Bowshewicz wrote:

You can certainly play a creature card. For examples, see Scout's Warning and Ward of Bones .

You can even play creatures: Check the oracle text on Uphill Battle .

But those three were the only exceptions that I could find. ikegami is right to say that the preferred term is "cast."



No, there is a difference with those 3, a they will include Dryad Arbor . So, with the ward, if your opponent had more creatures than you but not more lands, they still couldn't play the dryad. If it said cast, they could play the dryad because they wouldn't cast it.

Jun 24, 2012 -- 9:44AM, Dilleux_Lepaire wrote:



As long as it's random, I really can't see where's the problem. Anyway, there's already a few standard ways for doing this. We listed them in this thread. If someone does the bogey-bogey, eats the cards, waits until they come out, look out the approximate order, place replacements in the same order, calls the president to ask him to give him a string of numbers, puts the card in the given order, then pick the cards in the order given by taking the date of birth of his opponent, reversed, and taking only every other number, then a judge can clearly declare that he's random enough.


Jan 20, 2013 -- 7:03AM, Dragon_Nut wrote:


The beauty of sarcasm is that when the person using it is totally incorrect, you can just remove the sarcasm and end up with a post that is actually correct.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 17, 2013 - 8:41AM #17
Bowshewicz
Date Joined: Apr 12, 2012
Posts: 1,665
Uphill Battle states that creatures played by your opponents enter the battlefield tapped.

While that specific wording does include Dryad Arbor , it also implies that "play a creature" is a perfectly acceptable way to describe what happens when your opponent casts a "normal" creature spell.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Prev 1 2
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing