Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
4 months ago  ::  Jan 14, 2013 - 10:47AM #1
Anubuss
Date Joined: Mar 9, 2007
Posts: 5,152
For what ever reason I've been operating under the belief Trinisphere was banned in Legacy, but, as I discovered when someone pointed it out to me as I was working on a Vintage version, Trinisphere was restricted and in looking at it's legality, lo-and-behold, it's legal in Legacy.


4 Magus of the Moon
4 Simian Spirit Guide
4 Rakdos Pit Dragon
4 Gathan Raiders
3 Arc-Slogger
2 Akroma, Angel of Fury


4 Chrome Mox
4 Chalice of the Void
4 Blood Moon
4 Trinisphere
4 Seething Song


4 Ancient Tomb
4 City of Traitors
11 Mountain

Most of the list is par for the course.  8 Blood Moon effects, Trinisphere + Chalice to continue disrupting.  And mostly just firing off turn 1 disruption/win-con into turn 2 re-enforce board position.

Mostly I'm looking for advice on my creature base, since I might just be being cute with Akroma and the deck might even be viable right now.  I only have 1 viable Legacy deck right now, a budgetish (mostly Shocklands over the good duals) Zoo list, but Zoo seems to be a pretty poor choice right now.  This would only really require me to drop the cash/all my good trade fodder on the manabase and a few other bits and pieces.


   
   
   
        height="200" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />


My Decks Show

Standard:
BR Aggro
Burn
RDW

Modern:
Dragon Stompy
Burn
Fae Tempo
Zoo
Cherrios

Legacy:
Zoo
Dragon Stompy

Pauper:
Slivers
Landfall

EDH:
Sliver Overlord


1000th post on 2-1-10.
5000th post on 1-21-13.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 14, 2013 - 10:56AM #2
AzureShade
Date Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Posts: 3,682
I'm not 100% on Arc-Slogger .  I never really liked him even though he was somewhat popular in some circles. 

Dec 18, 2012 -- 7:05PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 14, 2013 - 11:11AM #3
MadAdmiral
Date Joined: Oct 26, 2011
Posts: 2,133
I also don't like Arc-Slogger.  Or Akroma.  I think you only want creatures that you can cast off a single Seething Song.  I honestly can't think of what would be good.  Maybe  Demigod of Revenge or Thundermaw Hellkite .
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 14, 2013 - 2:13PM #4
Anubuss
Date Joined: Mar 9, 2007
Posts: 5,152
Slogger turns all those cards I'll never draw into damage.  He's solid for this strategy.  As for Akroma, I grabed her mostly as bait/decoy for Raiders, but her morph is only off of Song by 1, so I could cast her turn 1 as a 2/2 then morph and swing on turn 2.  It's cute, still need more testing to see how viable it is.

   
   
   
        height="200" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />


My Decks Show

Standard:
BR Aggro
Burn
RDW

Modern:
Dragon Stompy
Burn
Fae Tempo
Zoo
Cherrios

Legacy:
Zoo
Dragon Stompy

Pauper:
Slivers
Landfall

EDH:
Sliver Overlord


1000th post on 2-1-10.
5000th post on 1-21-13.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 21, 2013 - 6:39PM #5
Anubuss
Date Joined: Mar 9, 2007
Posts: 5,152
bump?

   
   
   
        height="200" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" />


My Decks Show

Standard:
BR Aggro
Burn
RDW

Modern:
Dragon Stompy
Burn
Fae Tempo
Zoo
Cherrios

Legacy:
Zoo
Dragon Stompy

Pauper:
Slivers
Landfall

EDH:
Sliver Overlord


1000th post on 2-1-10.
5000th post on 1-21-13.
Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 5:07AM #6
Renasce
Date Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Posts: 826

Jan 14, 2013 -- 11:11AM, MadAdmiral wrote:

I think you only want creatures that you can cast off a single Seething Song.  I honestly can't think of what would be good.  Maybe  Demigod of Revenge or Thundermaw Hellkite .




Demigod is awful in this deck. Such a colour-intensive card in a deck with 8 colourless mana sources? You might as well cover your ears in advance for all the laughter your opponent is gonna throw in your face. Although he's probably still reeling from the laughing fit over seeing you play Dragon Stompy in this day and age.

Slogger is okay, but I only ever ran two.

As for other options:

Phyrexian Revoker is hit with Chalice, but it's still too useful to ignore, especially since Planeswalkers don't care if you lock down their mana, etc.

Moltensteel Dragon is RPD 5-8. It's not all that great, but it's better than Akroma.

Thundermaw is worth considering, I guess.

Depending too much on bad mana boosting is what seperates bad DS players from the good ones.

The deck still sucks because there's no good red card that costs 2R. And for the record, Taurean Mauler is not a good card. It sucks. Like you do for thinking that it's a good card. Yes, you. The guy who was about to type up a post defending it.

The deck also sucks. Remember earlier when I talked about seperating good DS players from bad ones? I was lying. They're all bad. Good players don't play DS anymore.

I love this deck to death, but it sucks. Instead of playing a deck that sucks, sell the cards, then go out and buy all the Delvers in the world. Sit on them for a month, then sell them back at ridiculous prices. After this, go out to a fancy restaurant with that girl you always liked but were too shy to ask out. Even if she ends up dumping her glass of wine on your face, you will still feel better than after trying to play this deck at a tournament.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 5:37AM #7
AzureShade
Date Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Posts: 3,682

Jan 29, 2013 -- 5:07AM, Renasce wrote:

Jan 14, 2013 -- 11:11AM, MadAdmiral wrote:

I think you only want creatures that you can cast off a single Seething Song.  I honestly can't think of what would be good.  Maybe  Demigod of Revenge or Thundermaw Hellkite .




Demigod is awful in this deck. Such a colour-intensive card in a deck with 8 colourless mana sources? You might as well cover your ears in advance for all the laughter your opponent is gonna throw in your face. Although he's probably still reeling from the laughing fit over seeing you play Dragon Stompy in this day and age.


You are aware that, with eight Blood Moon cards, your non-basics don't stay non-mountains past like...turn two at most.  Turn one you're either casting Trinisphere or Blood Moon / Magus of the Moon to wreck your opponent's first few turns.  After that, there's enough free red mana laying around to drop a Demigod or a Hellkite on turn three while they are still struggling to cast spells.

Yes, this deck isn't a fan of Force of Will , but no deck is.  I've run a few tests on a modified version of this and I seem to have the game pretty much wrapped up by turn four or five with enough disruption on the board to keep my opponent from comboing off or doing anything meaningful.

Dec 18, 2012 -- 7:05PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 6:13AM #8
Renasce
Date Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Posts: 826

Jan 29, 2013 -- 5:37AM, AzureShade wrote:

You are aware that, with eight Blood Moon cards, your non-basics don't stay non-mountains past like...turn two at most.  Turn one you're either casting Trinisphere or Blood Moon / Magus of the Moon to wreck your opponent's first few turns.  After that, there's enough free red mana laying around to drop a Demigod or a Hellkite on turn three while they are still struggling to cast spells.




First of all, that still makes you painfully reliant on bad mana ramping. This is already a weakness of the deck, pushing it further than absolutely necessary will only make the deck worse than it already is.

Secondly, if you're dropping Moon effects immediately in every game you play, then you're doing something wrong. Plenty of times you want/need the extra mana for various reasons, the most common being that you want to put down Trini or Chalice and lock down your opponent with those first. Especially a double Chalice can give you some serious advantage early game. The Revoker I mentioned is also good to drop when you still have lots of mana. Or even a big creature before you lock down the mana, although this is more rare since it leaves you open to getting sucker punched and isn't a lock piece.

There's a reason why no one plays Demigod in this deck. It's just not good to commit so heavily to the chance of both drawing a Song and then not having it disrupted in any way. And if you're giving up most of your good mana boosting incredibly early in the game like that, unless you're under pressure to do so, then you're screwing yourself for no reason.

Jan 29, 2013 -- 5:37AM, AzureShade wrote:

Yes, this deck isn't a fan of Force of Will , but no deck is.




Most decks don't empty their hand to make one big play that can be stopped by two untapped Islands. The problem isn't that the deck is hurt by FoW, it's that the deck is especially vulnerable to it. This is like the difference between Godsire and Tarmogoyf . Both can be said to die to every piece of removal under the sun, but there's a difference between how much you will cry when your enemy pulls a Doom Blade on each of the two, because you already dedicated all your resources to getting out Godsire and now you have nothing left. Same situation.

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 6:18AM #9
AzureShade
Date Joined: Jan 30, 2012
Posts: 3,682

Jan 29, 2013 -- 6:13AM, Renasce wrote:

Most decks don't empty their hand to make one big play that can be stopped by two untapped Islands. The problem isn't that the deck is hurt by FoW, it's that the deck is especially vulnerable to it. This is like the difference between Godsire and Tarmogoyf . Both can be said to die to every piece of removal under the sun, but there's a difference between how much you will cry when your enemy pulls a Doom Blade on each of the two, because you already dedicated all your resources to getting out Godsire and now you have nothing left. Same situation.


Welcome to the thrill of "all in" style decks?

Dec 18, 2012 -- 7:05PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!

Quick Reply
Cancel
4 months ago  ::  Jan 29, 2013 - 6:54AM #10
Renasce
Date Joined: Sep 22, 2012
Posts: 826
I was merely explaining why it really, really hates counterspells and relying on Song, etc. for one big play is often a bad idea. I mean, I have swung for 22 with RPD, but I have also cried myself to sleep when my Arc-Slogger got countered while the mean poopy-head blue player had 4 life left.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing