Community

Jan 14, 2013 -- 1:12AM, GM_Champion wrote:

I know Cats and Sarah have both stated several times to have had personal conversations with the ORC's

Link, please?

Also, I hope everyone doesn't take my IT talk for truth, as I'm not all that experienced on the subject. I was just intrigued to see if Bankai could actually make any technical objections to any of my statements, or go with his usual ad hominems and further derailings (you know, like spying with operative systems). I'm still fairly certain that there's more truth in whatever I'm saying though.

I want a link so I can deem your statement trustworthy, because your accusations doesn't fit into reality as I perceive it. Your lack of desire to have any credibility doesn't cause me any problems. I am perfectly comfortable assuming what you just said is a lie, but it might benefit you to convince me otherwise.

Jan 14, 2013 -- 12:20AM, Fenix. wrote:

Since we've lingered on this point for a while, I might as well kick things into the next stage, because GM_Champion seems to be slowrolling it;

Mark Rosewater is actually a Computer Virus...

Sir, I just wanted to tell you that I am thoroughly impressed. This was a magnificent piece of work and you should be proud to have written it. I applaud you.

Bunch of shenanigans. Linux is the most transparent OS you can run on. Working from raw CLI gives you the most power and visibility into running processes and hardware usage.

Even if some shmuck tries to tell me that top doesn't tell you everything that's running it still shows resource consumption.

And if this same shmuck were to tell me that were all a grand scheme to deceive all we have to do is debug the code and display that it doesn't do anything else but poll processes and monitors. Also, if your machine is working its spinning the disk, if there's no activity it is idle. If you have a SSD you can view activity based on power consumption straight off the hardware. Impossible to fool.

But the big joke here is no one cares what you do... unless you do something that steps you out of line. Then people care. If no one cares they won't waste resources on you. 

Jan 14, 2013 -- 10:10AM, Niche wrote:

Wow, GM_Champion... you fascinate me.

What happens when someone who actually uses Linux and computers as part of a career they've received professional training for comes in here and starts picking you apart?

Or do you think your fallacious talking points have already somehow discredited any expertise that could be brought to bear on the subject? 

They start lulzing and just refuse to take it seriously?




As a side note, there is at least one truly amazing hacker who is spying on a solid plurality of America.



It's just that he's actually a hacker, not a "hacker" and we're all giving him that information volluntarily.





Aaaand... that's my biggest thing with these conspiracies. All inanity and impossibility to beleive aside, all failures of sense, logic and knowledge...
The real test that they fail is how utterly pointless it would be. People are perfectly happy to spy on themselves as it is.