|
6 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 5:13PM
#1
|
Date Joined:
May 17, 2012
|
Tiny Legend of Legends  Legendary Creature  : Destroy two target non-land permanents with the same name.  : Destroy two target Land with the same name. 0/1 The original design. Tiny Legend of Legends  Legendary Creature  : Target non-land permanent is Legendary. : Target Land is Legendary. 0/1
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 7:19PM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Dec 12, 2008
|
Wait, isn't this colorless, turn three, repeatable, unrestricted basic land destruction?
Isn't that really over powered?
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 7:23PM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Apr 14, 2010
|
The Legend rule doesn't apply to non-legendary things (even if they have the same name as a legendary thing), so it's more "  : Destroy two target permanents with the same name." But still. My other thought was that this should be called "The Blue Fairy" but now I can't remember why.
"Go, then. There are other worlds than these." -- Stephen King, The Gunslinger Some things to make the forums nicer -- Last updated 28 Apr
Show
Share and enjoy. Suggestions for new things to fix always welcome!
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 7:26PM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Nov 15, 2012
|
Wait, isn't this colorless, turn three, repeatable, unrestricted basic land destruction?
Isn't that really over powered?
maybe, wizards gets touchy about not touching lands
TLDR
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 10:28PM
#5
|
Date Joined:
Dec 12, 2008
|
The Legend rule doesn't apply to non-legendary things (even if they have the same name as a legendary thing), so it's more ": Destroy two target permanents with the same name." But still.
My other thought was that this should be called "The Blue Fairy" but now I can't remember why.
Huh. Didn't know it worked that way.
But yeah, still, I feel like this has the potential to be utterly miserable in a red or green ramp/LD deck. Even if it wouldn't be strictly overpowered, it would have quite a bit of potential to cause great misery.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 06, 2013 - 12:31PM
#6
|
Date Joined:
May 17, 2012
|
Good point, I've now made it's use on Land cost more. Are you saying it wouldn't work on land anyway or that it dosn't work on things that arn't already legendary. In the case of the latter, the ability wouldn't work at all. It's not so much as and . This is a good price?
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 06, 2013 - 12:35PM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Oct 12, 2010
|
The Legend rule doesn't apply to non-legendary things (even if they have the same name as a legendary thing), so it's more ": Destroy two target permanents with the same name." But still.
Wizards is also trying to avoid "is legendary" specifically because of the rules wackiness of having legendary and nonlegendary permanents wtih the same name. I mean, it's workable theoretically, but is it grokkable to entry-level players? I say no.
Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.
----
Autocard is your friend.
[c]Lightning Bolt[/c] = Lightning Bolt 
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Jan 06, 2013 - 1:21PM
#8
|
Date Joined:
May 17, 2012
|
I supose I could just have it go ahead and destroy two permanents with the same name instead, again more expensivly for land.
|
|
|
