|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 5:44PM
#31
|
Date Joined:
Feb 28, 2011
|
but staying power means that lifegain isnt nearly the same problem. heroes' reunion is bad news for burn spells, healing for more than what 2 spells can deal in damage. for MGA however it "just" means that it will take another turn to kill opponent, if that. lifegain and playershroud are relatively rare in mainboard but much less so in sideboard, factor those in and MGA will have a better chance at winning g2 than RDW - although RDW likely has a slight advantage G1.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 6:04PM
#32
|
Date Joined:
Dec 12, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 6:16PM
#33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 6:36PM
#34
|
|
|
^^assumes it will resolve and connect. Not a safe assumption in the slightest. Having to rely on a creature for that effect is...not very reliable. I don't see why you think rawsugar's logic is flawed tho. His analysis is pretty much spot on. RDW does have a very strong G1. But 2/3 it does not get as strong of sb choices as other decks, because it can't deviate from it's strategy of kill kill kill! Without sacrificing too much speed. Vortex is a good sb card, except that it's murderous in the 3 slot where you wanna be casting those hasty dudes and spells. It goes back to g2/3 choices. RDW just aren't that strong vs other decks. RDW does get hellrider for evasion, but then MGA gets champion of lambholt . It does all come down to preference I suppose.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 7:02PM
#35
|
|
|
It does all come down to preference I suppose.
it does.
considering I don't play with sideboards I'm not an authority on the subject so I could be wrong there. The argument still stands, though, that RDW has plenty of options when it coems to life gain
and I definitely think its safer to assume a burn spell will hit an opponent than a creature. Counterspells and damage prevention are far less common than blockers.
I think I'm gonna stop talking now though because A: I'm feeling ganged up on for basically just saying a deck was like RDW and B: we've officially threadjacked the OP's thread about a simple green fatty deck.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 7:30PM
#36
|
|
|
Lol we have. Sorry u feel Ganged up on. Just expressing different styles of play. Always good for learning
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 7:43PM
#37
|
|
|
Lol we have. Sorry u feel Ganged up on. Just expressing different styles of play. Always good for learning
OK I promise this is the last one 
I only felt ganged up on because there were 2 people on the opposite side of the debate from me. Otherwise it was a fun and, thankfully very civil I've seen internet debates get way more out of hand than this lol. Glad there's no bad blood or anything
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Jan 05, 2013 - 8:19PM
#38
|
|
|
^^ you are a poopy head :D There! Burned!!! Oooooo!!!! Haha no I jest...lol
|
|
|