Community

 
Magic: The Gathering Rules Q&A [GTC Spoilers] Color Identity and Reminder text
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Switch to Forum Live View [GTC Spoilers] Color Identity and Reminder text
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 3:45AM #1
Enigma256
Date Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Posts: 13,863
can this go into a mono-black commander deck?

proud member of the 2011 community team
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 3:55AM #2
rezzahan
Date Joined: Mar 12, 2011
Posts: 4,785
Yes.

903.4. The Commander variant uses color identity to determine what cards can be in a deck with a certain commander. The color identity of a card is the color or colors of any mana symbols in that card’s mana cost or rules text, plus any colors defined by its characteristic-defining abilities (see rule 604.3) or color indicator (see rule 204).

903.4b Reminder text is ignored when determining a card’s color identity. See rule 207.2.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 5:20AM #3
LMTRK
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2009
Posts: 6,866
That makes no sense to me.

If they spelled the ability out on the card in full then it would not be allowed in a mono-black Commander deck, but because they used a keyword to save space it is allowed?

~ Tim   
I am Blue/White
Reached DCI Rating 1800 on 28/10/11. :D
Sig Show

May 23, 2013 -- 10:32AM, zammm wrote:

May 23, 2013 -- 10:06AM, Adroitmind@gmail.com wrote:

Not bad. But what happens flavor wise when one kamahl kills the other one?

Zis iz a sign uf deep psychological troma, buried in zer subconscious mind. By keelink himzelf, Kamahl iz physically expressink hiz feelinks uf self-disgust ova hiz desire for hiz muzzer. [/GermanPsychologistVoice]


Jan 5, 2013 -- 9:32PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jan 4, 2013 -- 5:20AM, LMTRK wrote:

That makes no sense to me.

If they spelled the ability out on the card in full then it would not be allowed in a mono-black Commander deck, but because they used a keyword to save space it is allowed?

~ Tim   


Yup, just like you can have Birds of paradise in a mono green deck but not Noble Hierarch . YAY COLOR IDENTITY


Oct 26, 2012 -- 9:56PM, zammm wrote:

Oct 26, 2012 -- 12:24AM, Raeoran wrote:

Is algebra really that difficult?

Survey says yes.


Jul 7, 2011 -- 12:59AM, Novacat wrote:

Jul 7, 2011 -- 12:36AM, LMTRK wrote:

You want to make a milky drink. You squeeze a cow.


I love this description. Like the cows are sponges filled with milk. I can see it all Nick Parks claymation-style with the cow's eyes bugging out momentarily as a giant farmer squeezes it like a squeaky dog toy, and milk shoots out of it.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 5:26AM #4
Enigma256
Date Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Posts: 13,863
the color identity rule doesn't make sense on many levels
proud member of the 2011 community team
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 5:26AM #5
rezzahan
Date Joined: Mar 12, 2011
Posts: 4,785
That's how the rules are currently. Maybe they'll change them with the release of Gatecrash, as I don't know of any other keyword ability that has a colored symbol.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 10:36AM #6
MadCow21
Date Joined: Sep 16, 2008
Posts: 364
So we are saying that even though the rules text of the keyword ability contains a mana symbol, and the card has that ability, the card does not have the rules text of that ability?

That seems like trying to say that the equip ability doesn't target because the text on the card doesn't say it does.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 10:41AM #7
cyphern
Date Joined: Jan 19, 2003
Posts: 17,671

So we are saying that even though the rules text of the keyword ability contains a mana symbol, and the card has that ability, the card does not have the rules text of that ability?


Yes, in much the same way that Mind Bend can't change what Fear does. Keywords can and do remove text from a card.

That seems like trying to say that the equip ability doesn't target because the text on the card doesn't say it does.


The ability still targets, but the card doesn't have the word "target" in its rules text.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 12:34PM #8
ikegami
Date Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 2,232

Jan 4, 2013 -- 3:55AM, rezzahan wrote:

903.4b Reminder text is ignored when determining a card’s color identity. See rule 207.2.


Yes, but "Extort" can't be ignored.  At this moment, Keyword Abilities (as opposed to Keyword Actions) are fully replaceable with the text they are defined to "mean"*, so I forsee a rule clarifying that the text of keyword abilities counts towards the card's text for EDH's color identity. We'll have to wait and see to be sure, though.

* — Nothing says "Whenever a player {keyword ability}s, ..." or "If a player were to {keyword ability}, he ... instead."

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 1:16PM #9
Ichibann
Date Joined: Sep 4, 2010
Posts: 717
How could this be true?
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 1:20PM #10
ikegami
Date Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 2,232
How could what be true?
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 4  •  1 2 3 4 Next
Jump Menu:
 
Magic: The Gathering Rules Q&A [GTC Spoilers] Color Identity and Reminder text
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing