Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 6 of 6  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6
Switch to Forum Live View Jace, Memory Adept after GTC
5 months ago  ::  Jan 11, 2013 - 10:32PM #51
Kazepenku
Date Joined: Nov 21, 2012
Posts: 786

Jan 10, 2013 -- 5:38PM, Jman22 wrote:

Jan 10, 2013 -- 12:21PM, XIII13Thirteen wrote:

Jan 10, 2013 -- 7:06AM, Jman22 wrote:

If you are running multiples of a card, there is always going to be a higher chance of one being near the bottom of the deck. Also, observation bias, confirmation bias.




Yeah, that is a valid point, but I'd hate for that to be the only one in the deck. Atleast, I can favor the probability of them being in hand. I know that often there are more ideal choices, but the card is hardly dead in most match-ups.




The only issue I have with Revelations is that it is absoloutely miserable to draw one when there's already one in your hand. And four seems like real overkill.


Jan 10, 2013 -- 10:15AM, Kazepenku wrote:


Well. An angel of serenity for 4 Jace, Memory adept + a mizzium mortars or for 3 hellriders + 2 mizzium mortars, I chose the hellriders. lol =3




This sounds like someone had no clue how much an Angel of Serenty is worth. 


 




this was back when angel was 35 dollars.

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 12, 2013 - 8:05AM #52
Jman22
Date Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Posts: 2,795

Jan 11, 2013 -- 10:32PM, Kazepenku wrote:

Jan 10, 2013 -- 5:38PM, Jman22 wrote:

Jan 10, 2013 -- 12:21PM, XIII13Thirteen wrote:

Jan 10, 2013 -- 7:06AM, Jman22 wrote:

If you are running multiples of a card, there is always going to be a higher chance of one being near the bottom of the deck. Also, observation bias, confirmation bias.




Yeah, that is a valid point, but I'd hate for that to be the only one in the deck. Atleast, I can favor the probability of them being in hand. I know that often there are more ideal choices, but the card is hardly dead in most match-ups.




The only issue I have with Revelations is that it is absoloutely miserable to draw one when there's already one in your hand. And four seems like real overkill.


Jan 10, 2013 -- 10:15AM, Kazepenku wrote:


Well. An angel of serenity for 4 Jace, Memory adept + a mizzium mortars or for 3 hellriders + 2 mizzium mortars, I chose the hellriders. lol =3




This sounds like someone had no clue how much an Angel of Serenty is worth. 


 




this was back when angel was 35 dollars.




There was a point that Hellrider was 10 and Angel was 35? I thought they never intersected. But whatever, either trade would have been fine. Unless you actually wanted hellriders for a deck.

(at)MrEnglish22
"still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris"
-On the topic of Squire
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 12, 2013 - 9:25AM #53
Kazepenku
Date Joined: Nov 21, 2012
Posts: 786
lol hellriders were 12 I think and angel was 35, he threw in a mizzium to sweeten the deal. It was honestly a better trade for me, but I think he was just being generous cuz I didn't know much about hellriders. I ended up making a RDW 
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 6 of 6  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing