Besides that, indestructibility doesn't help a creature at all - that is, anything else you might use to get rid of a creature will work. Examples are:
I feel like I may have forgotten something, but in anycase, the aforementioned methods work. You can also 'premove' it with either a counterspell or discard spell, or you can take control of it on the battlefield with something like Mind Control or Volition Reins .
Hopefully this helps you out a bit with the rules and ways of dealing with indestructibility.
I'm all about super-control in MTG. If you're able to stop my shenanigans, then there aren't enough shenanigans.
The first question, at least, has rules nuances (the asker may not know what rules do or do not prevent the removal of an indestructible creature). Some people might not realize, for instance, that an indestructible creature can be removed by reducing its toughness to 0. Or by forcing its controller to sacrifice it. Some particularly rules-oblivious players might not realize that indestructibility doesn't stop effects that send a card to exile, or to owner's hand, or shuffle into / to the bottom of library.
I feel like I may have forgotten something, but in anycase, the aforementioned methods work. You can also 'premove' it with either a counterspell or discard spell, or you can take control of it on the battlefield with something like Mind Control or Volition Reins .
MtG Rules Advisor & Goth/Industrial/EBM/Indie/Alternative/80's-Wave DJ DJ Vortex
DCI Certified Rules Advisor from July 14, 2009 to July 14, 2012 DCI #5209514320
Wit found in Rules Q&A
RPJesus: "Man, screw the rules, I'll play a game of 2HG Archenemy Planechase Emperor EDH draft yet. Once I figure out the rules for it..." Chaikov: "Of course, casual Magic may be played any way your Pokemon group agrees on..." and "It's not logic. It's Magic!" GainsBanding: "I only play online. The Magic Online shuffler is AWESOME!" Ikegami: "one might think [adult cats] would make excellent tokens. The issue, though, is that they are very hard to exile. They return to the battlefield more often than an undying creature." Astarael7: "Does 121.1 imply that players are supposed to wear their poison counters?" Bimmerbot: "If you move the wrong way and [the poison counters] fall, it's a game rule violation" Helluminatus: "Just remember, if it looks like a duck, smells like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but the oracle text says creature - Bunny , then by god, it's a bunny." MadCow21: "Who are you and what have you done with the real Chaikov?"
Well, to be fair, it's slightly a rules question if you interpret it as "what can remove an indestructible creature from the battlefield?".
Twist all you want, but it's clear he wants help building a deck. It's easy to tell: The answer requires one to know the answer to "What format?". Once you realize it's a deck building question, it becomes clear that the question is missing a lot of information that would generate a good answer for the OP.
As long as it's random, I really can't see where's the problem. Anyway, there's already a few standard ways for doing this. We listed them in this thread. If someone does the bogey-bogey, eats the cards, waits until they come out, look out the approximate order, place replacements in the same order, calls the president to ask him to give him a string of numbers, puts the card in the given order, then pick the cards in the order given by taking the date of birth of his opponent, reversed, and taking only every other number, then a judge can clearly declare that he's random enough.
The beauty of sarcasm is that when the person using it is totally incorrect, you can just remove the sarcasm and end up with a post that is actually correct.
How to autocard (do this to specify a card in your posts): Type [c]Black Lotus[/c] to get Black Lotus . Type [c=Black Lotus]The Overpowered One[/c] to get The Overpowered One .
Twist all you want, but it's clear he wants help building a deck. It's easy to tell: The answer requires one to know the answer to "What format?". Once you realize it's a deck building question, it becomes clear that the question is missing a lot of information that would generate a good answer for the OP.
I don't think I'm even twisting it at all - the OP's first question is "how do you get rid of a creature that is indestructible?", that right there is a rules question.
I'm all about super-control in MTG. If you're able to stop my shenanigans, then there aren't enough shenanigans.
