Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Would you play alms beast?
5 months ago  ::  Jan 03, 2013 - 2:49PM #11
Shadowchu
  • Terminal n00b
Date Joined: Sep 10, 2006
Posts: 5,686

Jan 3, 2013 -- 2:05PM, Aqueous12 wrote:

@Lobster667 and Urzasapprentice


It's good to see some people who understand how nuts this guy is gonna be in limited.  The preview thread was full of people saying it would never see play anywhere and I just didn't get it, he seems pretty darn good from where I'm sitting.   Well, I guess that means I can look forward to this being undervalued by a lot of people.


While he seems good at attacking and putting on early pressure, he also seems really good at defending and stalling the game, which imo is exactly what Orzhov wants in Gatecrash.  Stall the game and then use Extort and you will eventually take over.  



Don't take that thread as proof this card won't be drafted. Most of those people are casuals who think magic is only about EDH. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 03, 2013 - 3:08PM #12
Jangotat13
Date Joined: Oct 17, 2006
Posts: 2,987

Jan 3, 2013 -- 2:49PM, Shadowchu wrote:

Jan 3, 2013 -- 2:05PM, Aqueous12 wrote:

@Lobster667 and Urzasapprentice


It's good to see some people who understand how nuts this guy is gonna be in limited.  The preview thread was full of people saying it would never see play anywhere and I just didn't get it, he seems pretty darn good from where I'm sitting.   Well, I guess that means I can look forward to this being undervalued by a lot of people.


While he seems good at attacking and putting on early pressure, he also seems really good at defending and stalling the game, which imo is exactly what Orzhov wants in Gatecrash.  Stall the game and then use Extort and you will eventually take over.  



Don't take that thread as proof this card won't be drafted. Most of those people are casuals who think magic is only about EDH. 



Actually it's a fairly even split between casuals who think magic is edh and spikes who think magic is standard. 

Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 03, 2013 - 3:09PM #13
EyeHunter
Date Joined: Jan 23, 2007
Posts: 3,448
He's fine, probably 2.0, might go as high as 3.0, depending on the rest of the set. Any easy way to evasion on him will be nuts. A B/W pursuit of flight would be good.
Spoiler: Show
My sig was so awesome it broke Browsers, I had to remove it.
Support Magic Fiction! Or Bolas will eat you

Mar 2, 2013 -- 11:57AM, WotC_MattT wrote:

You should never explain layers to people unless one of the following is true: they're studying for a judge exam, you're both in a Ben Affleck movie and it's the only way to save the world, or you hate them.

Jan 2, 2009 -- 12:46PM, WotC_dlaugel wrote:

We try to maintain the illusion that Magic cards are written in English.

May 8, 2013 -- 4:42PM, mjeremyjarvis wrote:

May 8, 2013 -- 4:33PM, Yxoque wrote:

Hell, if they steal from us, we'd be honored.


oh my god, AWESOME!
Then changing the Slivers was your idea! haha
lol


May 23, 2013 -- 11:00AM, Tevish_Szat wrote:

Occassionally when catering, I've been put the task of arranging Fruit and Cheese or Grilled Vegetable platters.  More than once a high class buffet has started with the mark of Phyrexia upon it.  Since i've got a good eye for color so it looks great to people who don't get the "joke" (it's a niceley divided circle after all: the outline gives you 4-6 "regions" to work with), this has actually got me put on platter design more often, resulting in Phyrexia's presence at more private and industry events.




I have 6743 Planeswalker points, that's probably more than you.
"Destiny, chance, fate, fortune, mana screw; they're all just ways of claiming your successes without claiming your failures." Gerrard of the Weatherlight
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 03, 2013 - 3:32PM #14
EyeHunter
Date Joined: Jan 23, 2007
Posts: 3,448
Oh, wait, I just noticed it's rare. The reason everyone is putting it is down is that it won't come up often in limited.
Spoiler: Show
My sig was so awesome it broke Browsers, I had to remove it.
Support Magic Fiction! Or Bolas will eat you

Mar 2, 2013 -- 11:57AM, WotC_MattT wrote:

You should never explain layers to people unless one of the following is true: they're studying for a judge exam, you're both in a Ben Affleck movie and it's the only way to save the world, or you hate them.

Jan 2, 2009 -- 12:46PM, WotC_dlaugel wrote:

We try to maintain the illusion that Magic cards are written in English.

May 8, 2013 -- 4:42PM, mjeremyjarvis wrote:

May 8, 2013 -- 4:33PM, Yxoque wrote:

Hell, if they steal from us, we'd be honored.


oh my god, AWESOME!
Then changing the Slivers was your idea! haha
lol


May 23, 2013 -- 11:00AM, Tevish_Szat wrote:

Occassionally when catering, I've been put the task of arranging Fruit and Cheese or Grilled Vegetable platters.  More than once a high class buffet has started with the mark of Phyrexia upon it.  Since i've got a good eye for color so it looks great to people who don't get the "joke" (it's a niceley divided circle after all: the outline gives you 4-6 "regions" to work with), this has actually got me put on platter design more often, resulting in Phyrexia's presence at more private and industry events.




I have 6743 Planeswalker points, that's probably more than you.
"Destiny, chance, fate, fortune, mana screw; they're all just ways of claiming your successes without claiming your failures." Gerrard of the Weatherlight
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 03, 2013 - 4:33PM #15
silentbobus
Date Joined: Jun 15, 2009
Posts: 7,539
It would be pretty insane at any rarity aside from rare. Trading your opponent life for a better board position is almost always going to be a good tradeoff. He should be in the 4.0 range.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 03, 2013 - 10:12PM #16
GeekyDad
Date Joined: Nov 6, 2012
Posts: 603

Jan 3, 2013 -- 3:32PM, EyeHunter wrote:

Oh, wait, I just noticed it's rare. The reason everyone is putting it is down is that it won't come up often in limited.



Like I said in the other forum, if he was common, he'd break Limited. If Gatecrash is like RtR, answers to a 6/6 (regardless of detriments) are few and far between. A turn four 6/6, even more so. Make him common or uncommon so a player can pull two or more in a draft, and it's too unbalancing.

You are Red/Blue!
You are Red/Blue!
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

You are both rational and emotional. You value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what I create. At best, you're innovative and intuitive. At worst, you're scattered and unpredictable.
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 2:10AM #17
Lobster667
Date Joined: Sep 30, 2010
Posts: 5,366

Jan 3, 2013 -- 3:09PM, EyeHunter wrote:

He's fine, probably 2.0, might go as high as 3.0, depending on the rest of the set. Any easy way to evasion on him will be nuts. A B/W pursuit of flight would be good.




This evaluation is going to last exactly until the first Alms Beast kills you (from 32 or whatever, I don't care).

If it's not a 4.0+, I'll be surprised.

A First look at Dragon's Maze Limited - New article up!
IN THE TANK - my very own blog for rambling about Magic!
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 2:22AM #18
Catotheyounger
Date Joined: Nov 18, 2012
Posts: 1,220

Jan 3, 2013 -- 3:09PM, EyeHunter wrote:

He's fine, probably 2.0, might go as high as 3.0, depending on the rest of the set. Any easy way to evasion on him will be nuts. A B/W pursuit of flight would be good.



This guy doesn't need evasion, one-sided abysses, even ones that gain the opponent a bit of life, are nuts.

Jan 3, 2013 -- 10:12PM, GeekyDad wrote:

Jan 3, 2013 -- 3:32PM, EyeHunter wrote:

Oh, wait, I just noticed it's rare. The reason everyone is putting it is down is that it won't come up often in limited.



Like I said in the other forum, if he was common, he'd break Limited. If Gatecrash is like RtR, answers to a 6/6 (regardless of detriments) are few and far between. A turn four 6/6, even more so. Make him common or uncommon so a player can pull two or more in a draft, and it's too unbalancing.



Come on, this guy isn't that much bombier than vitu-ghazi guildmage...

I don't have an egosig because I'd rather my ideas be judged on their merits than on mine.

Catpoints:
Spoiler: Show

What are catpoints?
A way of measuring how much I love you.
How do I get catpoints?
1:  participate in my forum games/contests.
2:  make awesome posts.
3:  destroy Carthage.
What can I do with catpoints?
You can ask favors of me.  I may or may not agree to your favor, depending on how big the favor is and how many catpoints you have.
Who has how many catpoints?
shadowchu:  100
Islands:  100
Niche:  50
mrindigo:  50
kips:  50
Rstnme:  25
Jman:  25
everyone else:  0
Keeperofmanynames:  -100
Morgothra:  -100
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 8:22AM #19
Arioch22
Date Joined: Feb 2, 2011
Posts: 1,582
I'm with Lobster and bobus, etc. It will be a limited bomb and a 4.0+ type card. 
Quick Reply
Cancel
5 months ago  ::  Jan 04, 2013 - 8:53AM #20
rstnme
Date Joined: Aug 10, 2012
Posts: 2,582
I'd agree this is a 4.0 as it stands, but until we see the removal engines the set has and the uncommons/all the guildmages (I haven't checked the new spoilers this morning) I'm reserving judgment that this is always a p1p1. Simple as that.
Limited Guidelines:

5.0: I will take this card no matter what: Pack Rat
4.5: Bomb and/or splashable creature or removal: Aetherling
4.0: Excellent first pick first pack, will sway me into same colors: Advent of the Wurm
3.5: Excellent first pack pick two, will confirm colors or possibly sway into second color. Gaze of Granite
3.0: Good in-color addition, or splashable removal/creature: Ascended Lawmage
2.5: Solid pick in-color: Bronzebeak Moa
2.0: Creatures 10-16; removal 6-7. Haazda Snare Squad
1.5: My 23rd or 22nd card, depending on removal. Wake the Reflections )
1.0: 23rd card if I don't maindeck an additional land: Murmuring Phantasm
0.5: This card will sometimes be sideboarded in: Uncovered Clues
0.0: I will shred this card for counters: Possibility Storm
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing