Community

 
Magic: The Gathering Rules Q&A Conjurer's Closet/Beginning of the end step stack
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Switch to Forum Live View Conjurer's Closet/Beginning of the end step stack
6 months ago  ::  Dec 29, 2012 - 2:05PM #1
Almightywood
Date Joined: Nov 3, 2012
Posts: 140
Basically if there are multiple "at the beginning of the end step" effects do they all have to be put on the stack at the same time?
If yes, is it still true with effects that say may?

Just wondering if you could use multiple Conjurer's Closet s on one creature basically (say Thragtusk ).
I know that since they both say target and each one causes it to change zones it becomes a new object, so if they both have to go on the stack at the same time, then it shouldn't be possible to do two of them to one creature.
Quick Reply
Cancel
6 months ago  ::  Dec 29, 2012 - 2:06PM #2
Mage24365
Date Joined: Jun 23, 2009
Posts: 7,599

Dec 29, 2012 -- 2:05PM, Almightywood wrote:

Basically if there are multiple "at the beginning of the end step" effects do they all have to be put on the stack at the same time?
If yes, is it still true with effects that say may?

Just wondering if you could use multiple Conjurer's Closet s on one creature basically (say Thragtusk ).
I know that since they both say target and each one causes it to change zones it becomes a new object, so if they both have to go on the stack at the same time, then it shouldn't be possible to do two of them to one creature.



They will not be able to blink the same creature because they all go on the stack at the same time. Your reasoning is correct.

I am the Twilight Sparkle of The Pony Co.

Ponies
are the best animals on the planet. A cartoon about them made for little girls is the best show on TV. Join the movement.
Rest of sig Show
Disclaimers Show
My initial responses to rules questions are usually just answers. If you want an explanation as to why, say so.
Just because it says I'm there, I'm not necessarily there. I leave my browser open so I don't have to reload ~30 tabs.
Anyone who wants to text duel me through either PM or chat can just PM me with a format (and a time if playing through chat). I don't play standard.

# Card Blind Hall of Fame Show
quotes Show

Sep 5, 2010 -- 9:26AM, Argus_Panoptes wrote:

So, how would I use a card that has a large in the top half and "sui?l? -- pu?? ?is?q" across the middle?

Dec 28, 2010 -- 11:36AM, razorborne wrote:

Dec 28, 2010 -- 10:46AM, signofzeta wrote:

Winning is not important if:

1.  You win by a blowout.

2.  You pay billions of dollars in cards to win.   If you like wasting money just to win one game, while you could have saved it to lose a few and end up winning more in the future, then it is fine by me.


what?

do you ceremonially light your deck on fire after a win?


Jan 26, 2011 -- 2:25PM, Gerdef wrote:

Or did no one notice Transmogrifying Licid before.  (And by not notice, I mean covered their ears and shouted LA LA LA LA )


Mar 2, 2011 -- 4:14PM, WotC_MattT wrote:

Mar 2, 2011 -- 12:53PM, Gerdef wrote:

Hmmm...

I think the most awkward situation at the moment is simply the Myr Welder / Equipment / Licid / Aura craziness, but I'm pretty sure he's aware of it.



If the most awkward thing going on right now involves Licids, I declare victory.



Feb 28, 2011 -- 9:50PM, zammm wrote:

We regret to inform you of Trevor Kidd's untimely demise in an unfortunate accident involving a mysteriously blown breaker box and a photophobic creature of unknown origin at his home near Renton, Washington. We at the Wizards Community apologize for any inconvenience or delay, and assure you we'll be preparing a replacement to assume his duties as soon as we finish warming up the cloning vats.


[02:47:46] It doesn't merely "come out of suspend" - you take the last time counter off, and then suspend triggers and say "now cast that! CAST IT NOOOOOW!"
[02:47:49] Because suspend has no indoors voice


[10:11:33] !opalescence
[10:11:33] Opalescence {2WW} |Enchantment| Each other non-Aura enchantment is a creature with power and toughness each equal to its converted mana cost. It's still an enchantment. · Reserved,UD-R,Vin,Leg,Cla,USBC
[10:11:51] *sigh*
[10:12:10] Otecko: Do you have a question about Opalescence?
[10:12:17] sure
[10:12:23] $10 on humility interaction
[10:12:25] :P
[10:12:29] :D
[10:12:47] humility + opalescence put into play by replenish



Ego Show

Dec 14, 2010 -- 5:59PM, Niklor wrote:

Mage is awesome, BTW.

Jan 22, 2011 -- 4:44PM, MisterFour wrote:

Dear Mage24365,

You are totally awesome. Thank you so much. I hope you are able to dine in Paradise without kicking the bucket to actually get there, and that every dollar you ever make magically becomes two more.


Jun 13, 2011 -- 7:05AM, Mage24365 wrote:

Jun 13, 2011 -- 7:02AM, RootBreaker wrote:

I don't think there are any cards like that.

There are things that prevent you from activating activated abilities, things that increase their cost, and things that counter them, but I don't think anything triggers from them specifically.

There are things that trigger from targeting, so that might be relevant, but I can't think of anything that triggers from targeting a player.

I'm almost positive there's nothing that triggers from damage being prevented.


Rings of Brighthearth ; Dormant Gomazoa ; Samite Ministration .


Jun 13, 2011 -- 7:08AM, RootBreaker wrote:

Well played.




Wikipe-tan face.svgThis user loves Wikipe-tan, the
cutest personification of Wikipedia.
^Put this in your sig; PM me for html code.^<
Quick Reply
Cancel
6 months ago  ::  Dec 29, 2012 - 5:15PM #3
puzzledmint
Date Joined: Jul 18, 2012
Posts: 898
To clarify, you could have each trigger target the same creature, but once the first one resolves and the creature has flickered, it will no longer be the same game object, and thus, no longer a legal target for the remaining triggers.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
Magic: The Gathering Rules Q&A Conjurer's Closet/Beginning of the end step stack
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing