|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 10:18AM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Nov 15, 2012
|
What was the structure of your turn, which has consist of the biggest number of actions? Just now I had five - Debtors Knell + Bloodgift Demon (ability) + Castigate + Exile + Vampire Nighthawk. It isn't very impressive, I know, but may be smb can share really interesting experience?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 10:25AM
#2
|
|
|
One hundred Sublime Archangel  triggering at once, with other random xalted critters as well. Done with CW, was fun.
beast within  : He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man. Got a question as to whether a card without shoud or hexproof is good? Answer is, dies to removal. I have a 94.824% win ratio with Mindstorms.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 12:04PM
#3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 1:05PM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Nov 15, 2012
|
One hundred Sublime Archangel
Someone created 100 Chancellor of the Spires 
100 of our own
Clash of the bloody titans) Strictly speaking, replication is one action (in the second case), just repeated n times. But breathtaking nevertheless)
Someone created 100 Chancellor of the Spires
I bet he laughed maniacally
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 1:47PM
#5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 2:11PM
#6
|
Date Joined:
Jul 20, 2010
|
Someone created 100 Chancellor of the Spires against us once (targeting Rite of Replication  ) in order to showboat. Next turn we killed the original one, cast Rise from the Grave  on it, and had to get 100 of our own with Heat Shimmer  just to defend!
...thankfully we won in the end.
I'm sure that by defend you meant 'force them to block with all their tokens against our 100 chancellors', right? Because there is no way you were defending with that bunch. How did you win, timer run out while they were assigning blockers? And if not, what happened when they survived the turn and it was theirs again?
I was wondering these same things... How do you have time to cast 100 of them then attack with all of them AND have them each individually be blocked before the timer runs out? If you did it with Heat Shimmer you couldn't have defended you must have attacked, right?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 2:49PM
#7
|
|
|
With haste, who wouldn't attack straight away? I thought that victory due to "not-enough-time-to-block-100-creatures" was assumed, lol!
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 2:53PM
#8
|
|
|
I'm trying to figure out how both of them made 100 before the timer ran out at all. Which means there couldn't have been nearly enough time for him to declare 100 attackers anyway. Unless it is different on xbox.
beast within : He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man. Got a question as to whether a card without shoud or hexproof is good? Answer is, dies to removal. I have a 94.824% win ratio with Mindstorms.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 2:57PM
#9
|
|
|
Make 100? No problem. Attack with 100? No problem? Block with 100? You lose.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 4:01PM
#10
|
|
|
With haste, who wouldn't attack straight away? I thought that victory due to "not-enough-time-to-block-100-creatures" was assumed, lol!
Actually, statements such as 'just to defend' and 'thankfully we won in the end' suggest otherwise, that this was not the end of the game. Otherwise, why string it out with that last line? Why not say 'we were forced to make 100 of our own with Heat Shimmer , and then killed them'? I do want to give Stevo the benefit of the doubt here, but this is very dubious to me. Not least of all because it suggests he was playing CW and OD, while we all know his combo is DP and OD...
|
|
|
