|
5 months ago ::
Dec 20, 2012 - 10:20AM
#71
|
Date Joined:
Nov 15, 2012
|
Great) Thanks)
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 20, 2012 - 11:04AM
#72
|
Date Joined:
Jan 11, 2012
|
Random Deck +1.
Also, I think the "randomizing" should only occur after EVERYONE is locked in. That way you don't have schmucks quitting then creating new games constantly until they get the random deck they want while others are truly getting a random deck.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 20, 2012 - 11:09AM
#73
|
|
|
Hey all, I appreciate the discussion here. I've forwarded the community's feedback on random deck options in the past, but I wanted to let you know for sure that I've reenforced that request with the discussions in this thread, they've read your posts, and it's definitely on the radar for future Duels consideration.
Cool. Thanks Sean!
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 20, 2012 - 11:13AM
#74
|
|
|
Random Deck +1.
Also, I think the "randomizing" should only occur after EVERYONE is locked in. That way you don't have schmucks quitting then creating new games constantly until they get the random deck they want while others are truly getting a random deck.
You obviously would not be able to see what deck you're getting until the game starts. That should be self-explanatory.
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 20, 2012 - 11:21AM
#75
|
|
|
Just because it should doesn't mean it would!
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 20, 2012 - 11:50AM
#76
|
Date Joined:
Jul 12, 2012
|
Well if the designers are reading this, I hope they implement a random deck option for both 1v1 and 2HG. I think it would generate a different playing experience in both formats -2HG without preset combos would be a pretty fun experience (although I like playing / playing against the combos as well).
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 20, 2012 - 12:04PM
#77
|
Date Joined:
Aug 24, 2011
|
Hey all, I appreciate the discussion here. I've forwarded the community's feedback on random deck options in the past, but I wanted to let you know for sure that I've reenforced that request with the discussions in this thread, they've read your posts, and it's definitely on the radar for future Duels consideration.
Thanks for taking notice - and am really looking forward to this feature being (hopefully) implemented!
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 7:52PM
#78
|
Date Joined:
Aug 11, 2008
|
I play with friends all the time. And I'd love this option. I hate always seeing the same 6-8 decks all the time. Hell I barely play more then 4 different decks any more becouse most of them don't do so well in multiplayer formats.
So, you refuse to use more than 4 decks, and your friends (which you play with "all the time") refuse to use even half the decks available. This option is going to fix that because now you'll get to play with the 15 decks that you yourself have admited that you don't like playing because they don't do well in multiplayer. You people boggle my mind sometimes.
Nobody even plays 1v1 on PS3 anymore because it's so damn boring playing against the same decks every game. A random deck function would significantly increase the staying power and replayability of this game.
This is simply not true. I just moved to playing this game on the PS3. I found it easier to get 1v1 games on PS3 than it was on Steam and I played against different decks every time. You guys should stop making things up to make this sound like a better idea.
For the vast majority of us who want a random option chosen by the person who creates the match, we will be on a lot more often, increasing the playerbase and logevity of the game past the last Deck Pack.
Honestly I think most people against random decks are the people who are afraid to lose if they aren't using one of the best decks in the game. If you don't want to play random decks, you don't have to. IT WOULD BE AN OPTION. Go take a look at the thread where people list what features they want for DotP2014. At least 80% of the people list random deck function as one of the most if not the very most important thing to add to the game.
I heard that 80% of all statistics are made up on the spot. That would be the "vast majority." Hardly 5% of the playerbase even comes to these forums, and I would guess that you only have a slight majority of that group that wants this option. Again, more information made up off the top of someones head to try and influence people into making a change to this game.
I'd much prefer they spend time fixing bugs than adding a feature that an obvious minority of players want.
Chancellor of the Spires is one of the worst cards in the deck. With only two of them, you are almost never going to get one in your starting hand. If you do get it in your starting hand, it will just sit there. If you get to cast it, it will get burned immediately. - gombl3r CW is NOT how a mono blue deck should work. -Khronikos If anyone in our little group believes in prayer ... we could use all you can give us. Edit: My name is Mark. It wouldn't be right to pray for the devil. -thedevilwuster
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 8:57PM
#79
|
Date Joined:
May 25, 2012
|
Where did you get your stat that "obviously" only a "minority" of Duels players want a random deck option? The same source that random lobbies would irrevocably "fracture" the Duels player base?
|
|
|
|
5 months ago ::
Dec 22, 2012 - 9:51PM
#80
|
Date Joined:
Aug 11, 2008
|
Where did you get your stat that "obviously" only a "minority" of Duels players want a random deck option? The same source that random lobbies would irrevocably "fracture" the Duels player base?
What's your count (of people who want it) up to? The couple of dozen of people in this thread? That would be a minority of players.
Chancellor of the Spires is one of the worst cards in the deck. With only two of them, you are almost never going to get one in your starting hand. If you do get it in your starting hand, it will just sit there. If you get to cast it, it will get burned immediately. - gombl3r CW is NOT how a mono blue deck should work. -Khronikos If anyone in our little group believes in prayer ... we could use all you can give us. Edit: My name is Mark. It wouldn't be right to pray for the devil. -thedevilwuster
|
|
|