|
6 months ago ::
Nov 25, 2012 - 7:46AM
#1
|
|
|
In an emporer match, with a Range of influence of 2 for spells, Player A casts lightning bolt  , Player B used Radiate  to have it target more creatures. The question is, would all the copies created by [/c]Radiate[/c] use Player A's Range of influence, or Player B's?
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Nov 25, 2012 - 7:50AM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Jun 21, 2006
|
In an emporer match, with a Range of influence of 2 for spells, Player A casts lightning bolt , Player B used Radiate to have it target more creatures.
The question is, would all the copies created by [/c]Radiate[/c] use Player A's Range of influence, or Player B's?
Both.
Player B controls the copies created by Radiate: player B's influence is used for those copies, but copies are created ONLY for those objects the original Bolt could target.
«Dystocracy : A system of government in which corrupt leadership colludes with dishonest bankers and greedy elites in order to ensure that productive members of society –people who actually do useful work- bear the greatest share of taxes while gaining the least benefit possible.»
Sounds familiar?
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Nov 25, 2012 - 7:50AM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Jul 28, 2010
|
not 100% sure, it's either Player A's range (because he can only target those)
or it is the common targets of Player A's and Player B's range (Player A for the reason above, Player B because he controls the copies)
proud member of the 2011 community team
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Nov 25, 2012 - 8:28AM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Oct 24, 2008
|
I'll have to agree with Chaikov and say both on this. Lets say for the sake of argument that in your example each player A and player B have a creature with hexproof (can't be the targets of spells or abilities your opponents control.) on the battlefield. The original Lightning Bolt cast by player A cannot target player B's creature with hexproof, so in turn Player B's radiate does not create coppies of Lightning Bolt targeting the aformentioned creature. At the same time, while player A could have targeted their own creature with hexproof, since the coppies generated by radiate are controlled by player B, one cannot target player A's hexproof creature and will fizzle.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Nov 25, 2012 - 8:28AM
#5
|
|
|
Chaikov makes sense on a level where i feel dumb for not realizing.
|
|
|
|
6 months ago ::
Nov 25, 2012 - 8:30AM
#6
|
|
|
I'll have to agree with Chaikov and say both on this. Lets say for the sake of argument that in your example each player A and player B have a creature with hexproof (can't be the targets of spells or abilities your opponents control.) on the battlefield. The original Lightning Bolt cast by player A cannot target player B's creature with hexproof, so in turn Player B's radiate does not create coppies of Lightning Bolt targeting the aformentioned creature. At the same time, while player A could have targeted their own creature with hexproof, since the coppies generated by radiate are controlled by player B, one cannot target player A's hexproof creature and will fizzle.
That clears up other questions, thank you all
|
|
|
