|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 2:36PM
#11
|
Date Joined:
Aug 28, 2008
|
Make some rule so they can somewhat function on there own. Your theories are more like predictions or proclamations I feel. Maybe do it more like geometry proofs? As long as something is something, it's also something, and then next turn it will be something else. You know, a chain of stuff.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 2:54PM
#12
|
Date Joined:
Oct 27, 2009
|
"A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupry MLP
Show
Congratulations, you've found My Lie Policy:
Only when i'm prompted, i might lie. (policy still in the refinement process.)
I am both rational and instinctive. I value self-knowledge and understanding of the world; my ultimate goal is self-improvement and improvement of the world around me. At best, I am focused and methodical; at worst, I am obsessive and amoral.
Show
I am Blue/Green
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 5:08PM
#13
|
Date Joined:
May 19, 2012
|
Artsy - just examples of creatures with the thing. Not actually going to be in the set. Except I do like the little guy. The Black one has no place, but thank you for the feedback. Chaos - Hmmmm. Like what though? I'm so happy that these are so short and sweet. I don't want to fill them with text. By the way, did you see my predictions? Because I made some. After a moment of thought: "Before you shuffle your deck you may take out as many as 7 theories and put them into your hand. When it comes time to draw your initial hand, draw X cards where X - the number of Theories already in your hand."That way you at least can get an assurance that your useless card will be in your hand. You'd also have to reveal it to your opponent. But let's say you were playing a syck Fire Inside + Revolve + Glitterfang  + Lotus Petal  / Simian Spirit Guide  Deck. That's 10 Flying, Trample damage on the first turn. But it is also pretty darn hard to pull off - why not just play Storm? Anyway, I'm digressing, but the thing about the proposed rule above is that it would make Theory Combo much more viable. Let me know what you think. I also like the idea of calling my deck Theory Combo.
Whiny weenie and observant aren't the same thing pablo, somehow I thought you'd understand.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 5:42PM
#14
|
Date Joined:
Feb 16, 2007
|
"Was once" and "will be" don't feel like they belong in a mystery set. They feel like they need Time Travel!Temporal Slide   InstantCounter target creature spell, then you may travel to the past. (As long as it's the past, replace all instances of "was once" with "is")
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 5:46PM
#15
|
Date Joined:
May 19, 2012
|
Oooh. Fallingman you glorious globlin. Can I steal that wording? I mean, it remains fairly parasitic - but you know, it sounds good. And when it comes down to it, isn't that what this is really about?
Whiny weenie and observant aren't the same thing pablo, somehow I thought you'd understand.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 5:48PM
#16
|
Date Joined:
Feb 16, 2007
|
Go for it, man! 
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 5:50PM
#17
|
Date Joined:
May 19, 2012
|
Darn it all. Now I want to make a Time Travel Set.
Whiny weenie and observant aren't the same thing pablo, somehow I thought you'd understand.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 6:42PM
#18
|
Date Joined:
Nov 15, 2012
|
each player returns a land and a non-land pernament to their hand during upkeep
TLDR
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 7:07PM
#19
|
Date Joined:
Aug 28, 2008
|
Darn it all. Now I want to make a Time Travel Set.
But they did that already. More than once.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 21, 2012 - 7:22PM
#20
|
Date Joined:
May 19, 2012
|
Yeah, but mine would be better.
Whiny weenie and observant aren't the same thing pablo, somehow I thought you'd understand.
|
|
|
