Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Why you should support the DOTP franchise and stop complaining!
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 8:37AM #11
konokono
Date Joined: Jun 12, 2011
Posts: 646
Is it even fair to say that 15 decks were given 40 cards?  Remember, the promo unlocks were PROMOTIONAL.  They were never meant to be unlockable through the course of ordinary play, so who's to say that the majority of players even got the codes?  As has been pointed out many times, forum-goers are a minority of the player base.  From the official base product, each deck only has 30 cards.

I understand the frustration.  Who doesn't want an extra 10 cards when we were used to having them already?  But to suggest that this is some major failing on the part of Wizards or Stainless, I think, is being unfair
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 9:49AM #12
Karstien
Date Joined: Aug 8, 2012
Posts: 884
My issue isn't with the 10 cards being missing. I would love them in the decks, true enough, but my problem is the classic 'wall of silence' marketing strategy being laid out here. A lot of people who have the game don't even know about these forums, and will be expecting promo unlocks. Hate to be one of them and not know exactly what i'm buying. On top of that, Wizards-Sean has been all over these forums in the days leading up to the release of the deck pack. Where is he now we want a simple yes or no answer regarding promo cards? If he has time off, then why aren't we getting an answer from somebody else? Is it really that hard? Hell, I would even accept 'I don't know' as an answer for now, at least it's honest, but instead we get absolutely nothing at all. 

I've been informed he likes to be contacted via pm, and sure enough, he said he always answers quickly. I know one person at least has pm'd him, where is he? He says he get's email alerts when pm'd, so ignoring it is my guess. And THAT is my issue.  
I am Blue/White
I am Blue/White
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

I'm both orderly and rational. I value control, information, and order. I love structure and hierarchy, and will actively use whatever power or knowledge I have to maintain it. At best, I am lawful and insightful; at worst, I am bureaucratic and tyrannical.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 10:20AM #13
Wizards_Sean
Date Joined: Jul 3, 2012
Posts: 806
I've posted a reply HERE concerning the new DLC and extra card unlocks.
Sean Gibbons
Associate Community Manager
Official MTG Twitter: @Wizards_Magic
Official MTGO Twitter: @MagicOnline
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 11:24AM #14
Splattercat
Date Joined: Jan 28, 2006
Posts: 6,860

Nov 7, 2012 -- 8:37AM, konokono wrote:

Is it even fair to say that 15 decks were given 40 cards?  Remember, the promo unlocks were PROMOTIONAL.  They were never meant to be unlockable through the course of ordinary play, so who's to say that the majority of players even got the codes?  As has been pointed out many times, forum-goers are a minority of the player base.  From the official base product, each deck only has 30 cards.

I understand the frustration.  Who doesn't want an extra 10 cards when we were used to having them already?  But to suggest that this is some major failing on the part of Wizards or Stainless, I think, is being unfair



It's perfectly fair. The people that designed the decks had to have playtested them to make them as balanced as they are. And they had to have tested them with the Promo cards. So why stop short?

In the final analysis, after the last decks are released, we will have 15 decks with 40 extra cards to customize with, and 6 decks with 30 unlockables to customize with. They had to have known this going in...


Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 6:13PM #15
NimNams
Date Joined: Aug 5, 2012
Posts: 343

Nov 7, 2012 -- 6:17AM, BrewskyUK wrote:

I've been reading a lot of people saying stuff like "I'm not buying the next dlc until there are promo unlocks."  Honestly, this deck pack doesn't look that appealing to me, but I'm still going to buy it.  The reason why is that I want to support the franchise.  I want Wizards to be able to justify putting more man power, resources, and cash into future installments of the game.




While I totally get your point and, to an extent, even agree with the sentiment, I'm on the flip side of the quote above. Ultimately, we're not supporting a charity or a social movement - we're talking about a product that we pay for. As such, our obligation to back this product is non-existent when we're not happy with what's for sale. Really, I can think of no better way of voicing our disapproval than with our wallets.

If we're striving to show WotC what we actually want from this game, skipping purchase on the deck packs makes sense: the core game gave us tons of content for a (comparatively) fair price. These deck packs are quite a bit more expensive per deck, and with less content. If we take exception, now is the time to say so, and our money is the way to voice it.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating a ban on anyone buying the deck pack. But I do think it's fair and legitimate to feel gouged by this latest offering, to such an extent that people decide not to buy it. If that doesn't improve WotC's offering, nothing will.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 6:54PM #16
Elijinite
Date Joined: Jun 23, 2012
Posts: 81
This topic should be why you should support the DOTP franchise and never stop complaining.


Not even poking fun, we should continue to support the product as companies will often see bad sales as 'Well that wasnt worth doing, lets not do it again'

But we should also complain, as the community has done since DOTP '09 and each iteration of the game since has made steps towards addressing those complaints.

So yeah, keep buying, but keep complaining too. If you stop complaining, you're telling a business that everything is perfect, and to continue as is.



Which all that said. You can make complaints and not be dicks. You can also still be gratious and appreaciative alongside complaints. Its not an either or extreme.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 7:03PM #17
puzzledmint
Date Joined: Jul 18, 2012
Posts: 914
Conversely, one could argue that if you keep paying for poorly-supported products, companies will often see that as an excuse to keep releasing poorly-supported products.

Which is why any responsible consumer should not purchase any product that is not up to your personal standards. What, exactly, those standards are is something that only you can decide.

A responsible consumer should also tell the company, in detail, the exact problems with the product that caused you to not purchase it, and tell them that you would only consider purchasing similar products in future if those problems are addressed.


When a company keeps making money, there is no reason for them to change anything. It's only when they start making less money that they start looking for what went wrong and how to fix it.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 10:48PM #18
Hakeem928
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2012
Posts: 2,362

Nov 7, 2012 -- 6:13PM, NimNams wrote:

Nov 7, 2012 -- 6:17AM, BrewskyUK wrote:

I've been reading a lot of people saying stuff like "I'm not buying the next dlc until there are promo unlocks."  Honestly, this deck pack doesn't look that appealing to me, but I'm still going to buy it.  The reason why is that I want to support the franchise.  I want Wizards to be able to justify putting more man power, resources, and cash into future installments of the game.




While I totally get your point and, to an extent, even agree with the sentiment, I'm on the flip side of the quote above. Ultimately, we're not supporting a charity or a social movement - we're talking about a product that we pay for. As such, our obligation to back this product is non-existent when we're not happy with what's for sale. Really, I can think of no better way of voicing our disapproval than with our wallets.

If we're striving to show WotC what we actually want from this game, skipping purchase on the deck packs makes sense: the core game gave us tons of content for a (comparatively) fair price. These deck packs are quite a bit more expensive per deck, and with less content. If we take exception, now is the time to say so, and our money is the way to voice it.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating a ban on anyone buying the deck pack. But I do think it's fair and legitimate to feel gouged by this latest offering, to such an extent that people decide not to buy it. If that doesn't improve WotC's offering, nothing will.




Intelligent debate... such a rarity. And I agree 100%.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 10:52PM #19
Hakeem928
Date Joined: Oct 8, 2012
Posts: 2,362

Nov 7, 2012 -- 7:03PM, puzzledmint wrote:

Conversely, one could argue that if you keep paying for poorly-supported products, companies will often see that as an excuse to keep releasing poorly-supported products.

Which is why any responsible consumer should not purchase any product that is not up to your personal standards. What, exactly, those standards are is something that only you can decide.

A responsible consumer should also tell the company, in detail, the exact problems with the product that caused you to not purchase it, and tell them that you would only consider purchasing similar products in future if those problems are addressed.


When a company keeps making money, there is no reason for them to change anything. It's only when they start making less money that they start looking for what went wrong and how to fix it.




Companies are full of people. People are lazy. Companies are therefore lazy.

It's human nature...

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Nov 07, 2012 - 11:01PM #20
RPJesus
Date Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 15,206

Nov 7, 2012 -- 6:47AM, Splattercat wrote:


I want to know how they could do evreything else as well as they did, but then, not even drop the ball, but shove a railroad spike through the ball and throw the ball into a fire, on something as simple as how many cards to put in the decks.



I take it you suffer from OCD?
Although if you wanna talk about dropping the ball, has the whole singleton thing been brought up? Like yeah, I get that they have a limited number of cards (30 or 40 either way), and they want some variety, but it bugs me that Krenko's deck only gets one copy of Krenko. Not that Goblin Gangland Style needs the help, but it's the principle of the thing (Although I mean, it's not really an issue, just one of those little things). And the fact that I would run 40 Krenkos and 20 mountains if the game allowed it (Even if he is a cheap Marrow-Gnawer knockoff) :33.

Zammm = Batman.
Bronies unite.
"I'd call you a genius, but I'm in the room."
It's my sig in a box Show

Jul 29, 2012 -- 9:56PM, ChaosLight wrote:


Everything is better when you read it in Bane's voice.


Oct 18, 2012 -- 11:06AM, SteelWall wrote:

Your human antics and desire to continue living have moved me. Just kidding. You cannot move me physically or emotionally. Wall humor.


Oct 26, 2012 -- 8:17AM, Chaikov wrote:

Copy effects work like a photocopy machine: you get a copy of the 'naked' card, NOT of what's on it.



Dec 3, 2012 -- 10:18PM, Splattercat wrote:


Funny story:
InQuest Magazine (I think it was InQuest) had an oversized Chaos Orb which I totally rooked someone into allowing into a (non-sanctioned) game. 
I had a proxy card that was a Mountain with "Chaos Orb" written on it. When I played it, my opponent cried foul:

Him: "WTF? a Proxy? no-one said anything about Proxies. Do you even own an actual Chaos Orb?"
Me: "Yes, but I thought it would be better to use a Proxy." 
Him: "No way. If you're going to put a Chaos Orb in your deck you have to use your actual Chaos Orb."
Me: "*Sigh*. Okay."

I pulled out this huge Chaos Orb and placed it on the table. He tried to cry foul again but everyone else said he insisted I use my actual Chaos Orb and that was my actual Chaos Orb. I used it, flipped it and wiped most of his board.

Unsurprisingly, that only worked once and only because everyone present thought it was hilarious.


My DM on Battleminds:

no, see i can kill defenders, but 8 consecutive crits on a battlemind, eh walk it off.





Jan 15, 2013 -- 5:28PM, Iam_IronMan wrote:


Jan 15, 2013 -- 5:20PM, Jerrymm91 wrote:

Hi guys!  So, I'm a sort of returning player to Magic.  I say sort of because as a child I had two main TCG's I liked.  Yu-Gi-Oh, and Pokemon.  Some of my friends branched off in to Magic, and I bought two pre-made decks just to kind of fit in.  Like I said, Yu-Gi-Oh and Pokemon were what I really knew how to play.  I have a extensive knowledge of deck building in those two TCG's.  However, as far as Magic is concerned, I only ever used those two pre made decks.  I know how the game is played, and I know general things, but now I want to get in the game for real.  I want to begin playing it as a regular.  My question is, are all cards ever released from the time of the inception of this game until present day fair game in a deck?  Or are there special rules?  Are some cards forbidden or restricted?  Thanks guys, and I will gladly accept ANY help lol. 


I have the same problem with women.




Is this my new ego sig? Yes it is, other Barry Show


Jan 7, 2012 -- 6:59PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

And that's why you should never, ever call RP Jesus on being a troll, because then everyone else playing along gets outed, too, and the thread goes back to being boring.



Dec 2, 2012 -- 1:39PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

See, this is why RPJesus should be in charge of the storyline. The novel line would never have been cancelled if he had been running the show. Specifically the Slobad and Geth's Head talkshow he just described.



Dec 17, 2012 -- 4:27PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

Not only was that an obligatory joke, it was an on-topic post that still managed to be off-topic due to thread derailment. RP Jesus does it again folks.




Feb 8, 2012 -- 4:40AM, ArtVenn wrote:

I think I'm gonna' start praying to Jesus... That's right, RPJesus, I'm gonna' be praying to you, right now.

O' Jesus

Please continue to make my time here on the forums fun and cause me to chuckle.

Amen.


Feb 17, 2011 -- 3:08AM, ArtVenn wrote:

Feb 16, 2011 -- 6:43PM, RPJesus wrote:

It was wonderful. Us Johnnies had a field day. That Timmy with the Grizzly bears would actually have to think  about swinging into your Mogg Fanatic , giving you time to set up your silly combo . Nowadays it's all DERPSWING! with thier blue jeans and their MP3 players and their EM EM OH AR PEE JEES and their "Dewmocracy" and their children's card games and their Jersey Shores and their Tattooed Tenaged Vampire Hunters from Beverly Hills


Seriously, that was amazing.  I laughed my *ss off.  Made my day, and I just woke up.


ArtVenn
You're still one of my favorite people... just sayin'.




Jan 11, 2012 -- 7:19AM, Salla wrote:

Jan 11, 2012 -- 4:37AM, Ogiwan wrote:


.....would it be a bit blasphemous if I said, "PRAYSE RPJAYSUS!" like an Evangelical preacher?



Perhaps, but who doesn't like to blaspheme every now and again?

Especially when Mr. RPJesus is completely right.


May 16, 2011 -- 12:18PM, Salla wrote:

I don't say this often, but ...

LOL



May 10, 2010 -- 7:37AM, AivaRuin wrote:



You... You... Evil something... I actualy made the damn char once I saw the poster...

Now you made me see it again and I gained resolve to put it into my campaign. Shell be high standing oficial of Cyrix order. Uterly mad and only slightly evil.

And it'll be bad. Evil even. And ill blame you and Lizard for it :P.



Jun 29, 2011 -- 11:05AM, Lineov wrote:

Jun 28, 2011 -- 2:44PM, Litmus wrote:



I'm trying to work out if you're being sarcastic here.  ...



Am going to stop you right there... it's RPJesus... he's always sarcastic


Jan 16, 2012 -- 11:37PM, febbstalicious42 wrote:

Jan 16, 2012 -- 11:35PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jan 16, 2012 -- 9:58PM, HeartlessNobody wrote:

we can only hope it gets the jace treatment...it could have at least been legendary


So that even the decks that don't run it run it to deal with it? Isn't that like the definition of format warping?


I lol'd.


Oct 26, 2011 -- 11:40PM, zammm wrote:

Oct 26, 2011 -- 7:43PM, TyGuy42 wrote:

Uktabi Orangutan What the heck's going on with those monkeys?

The most common answer is that they are what RPJesus would call "[Debutantes avert your eyes]ing."



Feb 9, 2012 -- 8:41AM, Dilleux_Lepaire wrote:

Spoiler: Show

Feb 9, 2012 -- 7:45AM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

Feb 9, 2012 -- 5:49AM, ORC_Ragnar wrote:

I’ve removed content from this thread because off-topic discussions are a violation of the Code of Conduct.

You can review the Code here: www.wizards.com/Company/About.aspx?x=wz_...

Please keep your posts polite, on-topic, and refrain from making personal attacks. You are welcome to disagree with one another but please do so respectfully and constructively.

If you wish to report a post for Code of Conduct violation, click on the “Report Post” button above the post and this will submit your report to the moderators on duty.

...Am I the only one that thinks this is reaching the point of downright Kafkaesque insanity?



I condone the use of the word Kafkaesque. However, I'm presentely ambivalent. I mean, that can't be serious, right? We're April 1st, right? They didn't mod RPJesus for off-topic discussion when the WHOLE THREAD IS OFF-TOPIC, right?

Right.



Mar 9, 2012 -- 3:32PM, Garthanos wrote:

Mar 7, 2012 -- 4:54PM, RPJesus wrote:


Save or die. If you disagree with this, you're wrong (Not because of any points or arguements that have been made, but I just rolled a d20 for you and got a 1, so you lose).



Mar 19, 2012 -- 5:07PM, Kalnaur wrote:

Mar 19, 2012 -- 4:41PM, DoctorBadWolf wrote:


This just won the argument, AFAIC.



That's just awesome.



May 12, 2010 -- 9:36AM, JustTerrorIt wrote:

May 11, 2010 -- 5:46PM, Master_Yumyums wrote:

HOW DID I NOT KNOW ABOUT THE BEAR PRODUCING WORDS OF WILDING?!  WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME?!



That's what RPJesus tends to do. That's why I don't think he's a real person, but some Magic Card Archive Server sort of machine, that is programmed to react to other posters' comments with obscure cards that do in fact exist, but somehow missed by even the most experienced Magic players.

And then come up with strange combos with said cards. All of that is impossible for a normal human to do given the amount of time he does it and how often he does it.

He/It got me with Light of Sanction , which prompted me to go to RQ&A to try and find if it was even possible to do combat damage to a creature I control (in light that Mark of Asylum exists).



Dec 16, 2011 -- 10:16AM, HairlessThoctar wrote:


+10



Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:23PM, Eonblueapocalypse1 wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:13PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:02PM, tehbeast wrote:

heaven or hell.


Round 1. Lets rock.



GG quotes!

RPJesus just made this thread win!



Jul 25, 2012 -- 12:06AM, WhiteRaven810 wrote:

Jul 23, 2012 -- 6:26PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jul 23, 2012 -- 5:47PM, felisdomesticus wrote:


Blue players get all the overpowerered cards like JTMS.  I think it's time that wizards gave something to people who remember what magic is really about:  creatures.


Initially yes, Wizards was married to blue. However, about a decade ago they had a nasty divorce, and a few years after that they began courting the attention of Green. Then in Worldwake they had a nasty affair with their ex, but as of Innistrad , things seem to have gotten back on track, and Wizards has even proposed .



You are my favorite. Yes you. And moments like this make it so. Thank you RPJesus for just being you.



On what flavor text fits me:

Nov 15, 2012 -- 12:55AM, CadaverousBl00m wrote:

Surely RPJesus gets Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius ?



Sep 15, 2012 -- 4:24PM, Dragon_Nut wrote:


First: I STILL can't take you seriously with that avatar. And I can take RPJesus seriously, so that's saying something.



Sep 17, 2012 -- 1:31PM, Banderbear wrote:


I'd offer you a cookie for making me laugh but it has an Upkeep Cost that has been known to cause people to quit eating.



Jan 2, 2013 -- 7:46AM, royk wrote:



I you loads



Jan 20, 2013 -- 10:27PM, TV_Casualty wrote:

Jan 20, 2013 -- 10:17PM, RPJesus wrote:

"AINT NO LAWS IN THE SKY MOTHER****." - Agrus Kos, Wojek Veteran


10/10. Amazing.



Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 5  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing