|
7 months ago ::
Nov 13, 2012 - 7:56PM
#41
|
Date Joined:
Mar 12, 2006
|
Since Catowner isn't here to say it, I'll say it for him: winning FNMs doesn't really mean your deck is good.
Okay, that outta the way: This deck is primarily for FNMs, so if Goblins can win FNMs, thats fine.
(at)MrEnglish22 "still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris" -On the topic of Squire
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 13, 2012 - 10:13PM
#42
|
Date Joined:
Jun 27, 2012
|
I was just pointing out I found a quack quack that describes you perfectly, quack quack quack quack quack
Also, you said you couldn't cast Krenko in a UB deck... A red card, in a blue-black deck. And you still obviously are missing the entire point of the thread.
If I said UB I meant UR, and I'm sure you could've deduced that in the context of this thread.
Anyways, I have yet to drop a game with my standard UG Defenders (not even using Galvanic Alchemist ) in my local playgroups, but that doesn't mean anything other than my opponents aren't playing answers to it. Point is, (relatively) anything can win FNM if nothing answers it. Goblins pre-rotation wasn't a bad budget deck (easily one of the most consistently-performing decks for how inexpensive the singles are/were) and I saw at least one decklist being run at each FNM I attended, pre-rotation.
This thread cares about post-rotation, however. And I don't think there remains a lot to be said in that regard. The best metric for determining how good Krenko is in a given UR deck is to test it yourself, or find someone else to do it.
Standard Pauper! (play it on MTGO)
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 14, 2012 - 2:09AM
#43
|
|
|
Since Catowner isn't here to say it, I'll say it for him: winning FNMs doesn't really mean your deck is good.
We could play this game, but I'll just say if you're winning for a month straight and you're playing a pool of around a hundred people, it's probably at least partly the deck.
That said. I really think Krenko should be held off on until Gatecrash at least. Hopefully the Gruul/Boros have something offer us Goblin players.
|
|
|
|
7 months ago ::
Nov 14, 2012 - 6:42AM
#44
|
Date Joined:
Mar 12, 2006
|
If I said UB I meant UR, and I'm sure you could've deduced that in the context of this thread.
Anyways, I have yet to drop a game with my standard UG Defenders (not even using Galvanic Alchemist ) in my local playgroups, but that doesn't mean anything other than my opponents aren't playing answers to it. Point is, (relatively) anything can win FNM if nothing answers it. Goblins pre-rotation wasn't a bad budget deck (easily one of the most consistently-performing decks for how inexpensive the singles are/were) and I saw at least one decklist being run at each FNM I attended, pre-rotation.
This thread cares about post-rotation, however. And I don't think there remains a lot to be said in that regard. The best metric for determining how good Krenko is in a given UR deck is to test it yourself, or find someone else to do it.
I could have, and I did, but I still wanted to point it out.
Other than that, agreed. Obviously random garbage can win FNMs, and obviously control decks are going to win if nobody plays Cavern of Souls.
I think in the grindy Thragtusk world we currently live in, a card like Krenko has a lot of room to grow, but people dismiss things too easily beacuse "he can be answered." We don't live in the Vapor Snag era anymore - our creatures can not do stuff for a turn and it not be the end of the world. Nobody has said that yet I don't think, but I wanted to put that out there before someone did.
We could play this game, but I'll just say if you're winning for a month straight and you're playing a pool of around a hundred people, it's probably at least partly the deck.
That said. I really think Krenko should be held off on until Gatecrash at least. Hopefully the Gruul/Boros have something offer us Goblin players.
I'm not really interested in playing that game, I just said it in Catowner's memory, may he troll forever.
(at)MrEnglish22 "still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris" -On the topic of Squire
|
|
|