Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Can Blue be ethical?
8 months ago  ::  Oct 05, 2012 - 10:41AM #1
Shamsiel
Date Joined: Mar 7, 2011
Posts: 1,753
Lately, the amoral scientist aspect of has been played more predominantly.

However, without or influences, I think can still be ethical and easily "leashed".

The philosopher archetype is obvious, but I was thinking more of a pragmatic sort of morality, by which preservation allows greater understanding (incidently, this is easily translated as 's no-kill policy).

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 05, 2012 - 10:47AM #2
Dr_Demento
Date Joined: Jun 28, 2008
Posts: 8,278
Definitely, it doesn't even need an outside color splash. It can also be amoral too though. Depends on the character.
"I think me going Bang bang bang I win is pretty intuitive"

Mafia Record:
Wouldn't you like to know?

2011 Mafia Awards - Mastermind of the Year

mymoment Show
\

Aug 19, 2010 -- 5:52PM, Vektor480 wrote:

Aug 19, 2010 -- 4:54PM, Dr_Demento wrote:

Aug 19, 2010 -- 4:27PM, TranscientMaster wrote:

Aug 19, 2010 -- 3:07PM, Dr_Demento wrote:

Riggers , every Rigger in print so far boosts other Riggers .



Moriok Rigger does absolutely nothing to boost other riggers. You are incorrect.



Moriok Rigger is not a Rigger in print. Only in Errata

WHAT NOW!

(yes, I did put that phrase in for that exact reason)


Congratulations, they have activated your trap card!


Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 05, 2012 - 11:30AM #3
Singe
Date Joined: Jan 13, 2006
Posts: 1,010

Oct 5, 2012 -- 10:41AM, Shamsiel wrote:

Lately, the amoral scientist aspect of has been played more predominantly.

However, without or influences, I think can still be ethical and easily "leashed".

The philosopher archetype is obvious, but I was thinking more of a pragmatic sort of morality, by which preservation allows greater understanding (incidently, this is easily translated as 's no-kill policy).


Of course since the big time villians favor high intellengnece for schemes to defeat their adversaries.

It's one of the most common things villians do.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 05, 2012 - 12:19PM #4
bay_falconer
Date Joined: Oct 12, 2010
Posts: 9,710
Definitely. Hell, even can be ethical, if society itself is wrong.

EDIT: Just noticed the fridge brilliance.

Jun 27, 2012 -- 12:04AM, GM_Champion wrote:

Clever deduction Watson! Maybe you can explain why Supergirl is trying to kill me.


----
Autocard is your friend.

[c]Lightning Bolt[/c]
= Lightning Bolt
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 07, 2012 - 2:40PM #5
Yxoque
Date Joined: Nov 25, 2009
Posts: 2,652
Of course it can. Blue wants improvement. Not just of the self, but also of society. Depending on your philosophical outlook, being ethical is a big part of improving society.
"What is etherium but the next logical step?"
It's all my fault. Show

May 8, 2013 -- 4:42PM, mjeremyjarvis wrote:

May 8, 2013 -- 4:33PM, Yxoque wrote:



Hell, if they steal from us, we'd be honored.



oh my god, AWESOME!
Then changing the Slivers was your idea! haha
lol


Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 07, 2012 - 2:42PM #6
Terti
Date Joined: Nov 24, 2011
Posts: 2,106
Why could it not be? Or any other 'colour' for that matter.
Spoiler: Show
Obligatory and Preliminary Smiley Reservoir:
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 07, 2012 - 9:34PM #7
Tevish_Szat
  • Unconventional Mafia Pro
  • Dark Lord
Date Joined: Jun 25, 2001
Posts: 9,227
Blue is not concerned with ethics -- neither morality nor amorality are inherantly more blue.  Some might argue that a lack of interest in morality equates to black-esque amorality, but really blue's stand is more passive than that.  It simply does not care one way or the other, and thus it is up to the blue individual to be personally moral or amoral.
"Enjoy your screams, Sarpadia - they will soon be muffled beneath snow and ice."
THE COALITION WAR GAME
-Phyrexian Praetor
Round 1: (4-1-2, 1 kill)
Round 2: (16-8-2, 4 kills)
Round 3: (18-9-2, 1 kill)
Round 4: (22-10-0, 2 kills)
Round 5: (56-16-3, 9 kills)
Round 6: (8-7-1) [current round]

Last Edited by Ralph on blank, 1920
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 08, 2012 - 2:45AM #8
Yxoque
Date Joined: Nov 25, 2009
Posts: 2,652
I wouldn't say Blue is unconcerned with ethics. It would find them very curious and interesting to study.
"What is etherium but the next logical step?"
It's all my fault. Show

May 8, 2013 -- 4:42PM, mjeremyjarvis wrote:

May 8, 2013 -- 4:33PM, Yxoque wrote:



Hell, if they steal from us, we'd be honored.



oh my god, AWESOME!
Then changing the Slivers was your idea! haha
lol


Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 08, 2012 - 8:25AM #9
ReaderAt2046
Date Joined: Oct 6, 2012
Posts: 27

Oct 7, 2012 -- 9:34PM, Tevish_Szat wrote:

Blue is not concerned with ethics -- neither morality nor amorality are inherantly more blue.  Some might argue that a lack of interest in morality equates to black-esque amorality, but really blue's stand is more passive than that.  It simply does not care one way or the other, and thus it is up to the blue individual to be personally moral or amoral.




I think that you are either mistaken or, more likely, use "amoral" very differently from the way I do. It seems to me that when bad, black is "immoral" (it knows the law and deliberately breaks it anyway), while blue is "amoral" (totally ignores the law).

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 08, 2012 - 9:26AM #10
chinkeeyong
Date Joined: May 30, 2010
Posts: 7,523
Moral = Personally adheres to a set of values
Immoral = Does not adhere to someone's personal set of values
Amoral = Does not personally adhere to any set of values
Embrace imagination.
Lord of YMtC | Ten Rounds Contest Winner
Solphos – A fan set with a 'combo matters' theme
Fool's Gold – The second set of the Solphos block
More Show

Each of its nine tails is imbued with supernatural power, and it can live for a thousand years.







My Standard deck: Setting Sun

Apr 19, 2012 -- 5:36AM, prospector wrote:

Think of how Neo couldn't beat the robots, but they kept him around anyways to defeat Agent Smith. Sure, the robots might not like having a Neo running rampant because instead of playing their favorite 4 drop fatty robot, they have to play a bunch of one mana Matrixs to contain him, but at least Neo keeps Agent Smith from reanimating an Iona on turn two.

Jun 26, 2012 -- 3:07PM, GM_Champion wrote:

Are you saying I'm trying to blame my loss on something? I don't care that I lost, I care that he's a sore loser, and a cheater, and a liar.

Oct 5, 2012 -- 1:36PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

CKY, are you bad at anything?

Oct 25, 2012 -- 9:53PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

I really enjoy imagining this from Kevin's perspective. Because in Kevin's world, Rosewater actually reads everything he types. Mark is sitting there right now, reading this, and thinking "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled. . ." Or some such. He chuckles low, then clicks on "The Best Of KEVINSET" and says "Yes, this'll do just fine. A busty lady with banding who deals direct damage to Zones!? Why this will be the star of my next set, and no one will ever believe you Kevin." Then he closes his Macbook, so his servant may move it out of the way, while another servant puts a Fetal Richard Garfield Clone lathered in Steak Sauce in front of him. Then Mark Feasts.

I mean, In KevinWorld, Mark is reading the very words I'm typing as well. Heck, in KevinWorld maybe I am Mark.

Nov 9, 2012 -- 2:27PM, Exxile72 wrote:

I'm beginning to think CKY may be anime in real life...

Feb 11, 2013 -- 7:38AM, Jessica_Morgan wrote:

Don't go anywhere CKY, I need to crash dramatically through your window and propose marriage and I don't want you throwing off my paradrop.

Mar 15, 2013 -- 7:56AM, Knifethrower wrote:

[In response to a thread about how hard grading is]

Upon reading this, I've found myself completely unable to operate in the world.  I tried to decide what to eat for breakfast, and pondered the vast consequences of my choice.  How do I balance my dietary needs against my desire to eat good-tasting food? Should I factor in how long it takes to prepare?  Cereal is ready in moments, but bacon takes longer to cook.

Then there is the impact on other industries.  Do people in the cereal industry deserve to be employed more than people in the bacon industry?  Which industry should I support? I don't even have the data regarding HOW MUCH the cereal industry benefits from me eating a bowl of cereal, or how much the bacon industry benefits from me eating a side of bacon.  How can I compare two qualities I can't even quantify?

And let's not forget the milk on the cereal.  In addition to determining whether or not milk is healthy for me, how much that benefits the milk industry, and how much the people in the milk industry deserve my support, we have to factor in the fact that cows are put under brutal conditions in order to collect thier milk.  Of course, the same goes for the pigs, and then they get killed.  Of course, I really like bacon.  So I need to come up with a scale that compares the value of cow happiness to pig happiness to my happiness.  What trade-offs am I willing to make here?  Does the fact that the pig gets put out of its misery count as a plus or a minus?  Isn't bacon bad for me anyway?

Deciding what to eat for breakfast (or any meal) is impossible.  Help me!

Apr 11, 2013 -- 6:15AM, altimis wrote:

I must admit chinkeeyong, you have the most interesting character ideas; and you play them well.

Apr 12, 2013 -- 7:13PM, magicpablo666 wrote:

Anyway, you'd be surprised about Time Stop. When I first saw that card as a relatively new player I didn't see its full potential until I read the reminder text. Is it that unintuitive, though? Mine I mean. What is possibility? Is it possible for me to type these words with my tusks? No, because I don't have tusks. Although I am now tempted to go buy some - obviously not from poachers or whatever - and use them as typing apparatus. I could be the best secretary ever. "What's your words per minute sir?" "Well, only six, but I use these tusks to type them." "You're hired!" That was the interview. And is anyone else disappointed that "apparati" is not the plural form of apparatus? I just could strangle a dictionary, because "apparatuses" is a real word. I guess it sounds pretty cool. I'll call them my Apparatusks.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing