|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 10:49PM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Jan 29, 2012
|
I was just wondering if anyone here has any interesting house rules, or rules that they had been taught when they were new players that turned out not to be real rules.
My personal example: My friends taught me how to play magic, and they told me that I was only allowed 1 mythic-rare card per deck.
Anyone else?
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 11:43PM
#2
|
|
|
It's not particularly weird, but around here we always mulligan 7 (when it's not an official event), and we'll let someone check the top card of their library to see if they can keep a crappy hand.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 11:53PM
#3
|
|
|
Our houserule is that either me or another player in particular is always attacked first. At least I assume that's a rule, it's what always happens.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 05, 2012 - 12:13AM
#4
|
|
|
Our houserule is that either me or another player in particular is always attacked first. At least I assume that's a rule, it's what always happens.
LMAO, I think everyone has that house rule :P
I guess our house rule is that, in multi-player at least, first to play still draws card 8, and if you mulligan, you still get to draw 7. We're easy...
That, and in the old school group, Hymn to Tourach was banned. Period.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 05, 2012 - 12:48AM
#5
|
Date Joined:
May 19, 2012
|
My house rules are that whenever you attack another player you have to make out with him or her. And whenever you do anything else to/with a player (e.g. make 'em discard, or draw, or steal their creature, or counter their spell) you have to sock 'em one good.
Thems the only rules I gots. Oh, and we play naked, with liquor bottles duct-taped to our mitts.
What a shame, I thought your previous one was fantastic.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 05, 2012 - 3:27AM
#6
|
Date Joined:
Oct 18, 2009
|
It's not particularly weird, but around here we always mulligan 7 (when it's not an official event),
We do this. and we'll let someone check the top card of their library to see if they can keep a crappy hand. 
But not this. EDIT: trully, most times we use a "for as long as all players are getting mulligans, the mulligans are free". Once one player keeps, the other(s) player(s) starts getting one less card each mulligan. Except for the very first mulligan, this one is always free even if all other players are keeping the first hand.
[<o>]
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 05, 2012 - 4:05AM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Sep 22, 2008
|
First mulligan is free, no matter what, second mulligan is free if it's justifiable and shown. 2 lands in an aggro deck is not justifiable, 2 lands in a super expensive deck is justifiable. We know each other decks pretty well. What's the point of playing agaisnt someone with 2 lands and 5 cards with 6 cmc in his opening hand.... or playing agaisnt someone with 3 forest in his starting hand and 4 blue cards that all cost 2 blue to cast. We know the game is already over from the start, the game will not be fun on either side. So free mulligan!
We also often "look at the next X cards on the library" when one side is dominating the other, to cut the slaughter short or to see if there's a possible way out for the losing side in the next 1-2-3-4 turns depending of the situation. If you are at 3 lands and I have 10 tokens and you have nothing and cannot do nothing, but you know you have a wrath of god in your hands, you can check your next 2 cards to see if there's a land that will allow you to cast it before you die, if you dont, it's over and you show those cards for the sake of curiosity, if you do have a land next turn, you decide to play it out.
I love trolls  Dont hate me because I'm blunt and you cannot handle it
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 05, 2012 - 7:43AM
#8
|
Date Joined:
Feb 22, 2005
|
My group also runs the 'free mulls to 7' with the first one definitely free and ones after that free if you can show 0/1/6/7 lands in hand. It's no fun playing a game where one player can't do anything and if there's nothing on the line there's no reason to make either player sit through that.
The '1 mythic' thing is slightly odd, but not very. Before my group all got a bit more disposable income those of us with access to better cards tended to tone our decks down. Tier 1 Wolf Run Ramp vs "The best BlueBlack deck I could build out of a fat pack and a deckbuilder's toolkit" isn't exactly a fair fight.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 05, 2012 - 8:06AM
#9
|
|
|
My house rules are that whenever you attack another player you have to make out with him or her. And whenever you do anything else to/with a player (e.g. make 'em discard, or draw, or steal their creature, or counter their spell) you have to sock 'em one good.
Thems the only rules I gots. Oh, and we play naked, with liquor bottles duct-taped to our mitts.
Damn, just when I was about to invite you for a play.
worship the horn
Show
http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/28209491/Conch_Horn
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 05, 2012 - 9:59AM
#10
|
Date Joined:
May 30, 2010
|
When my opponent mulligans to 4 or less in casual play, I usually let him or her draw more cards.
Embrace imagination. Lord of YMtC | Ten Rounds Contest Winner Solphos – A fan set with a 'combo matters' theme Fool's Gold – The second set of the Solphos blockMore
Show
 Each of its nine tails is imbued with supernatural power, and it can live for a thousand years.



My Standard deck: Setting SunThink of how Neo couldn't beat the robots, but they kept him around anyways to defeat Agent Smith. Sure, the robots might not like having a Neo running rampant because instead of playing their favorite 4 drop fatty robot, they have to play a bunch of one mana Matrixs to contain him, but at least Neo keeps Agent Smith from reanimating an Iona on turn two.
Are you saying I'm trying to blame my loss on something? I don't care that I lost, I care that he's a sore loser, and a cheater, and a liar.
CKY, are you bad at anything?
I really enjoy imagining this from Kevin's perspective. Because in Kevin's world, Rosewater actually reads everything he types. Mark is sitting there right now, reading this, and thinking "The greatest trick the devil ever pulled. . ." Or some such. He chuckles low, then clicks on "The Best Of KEVINSET" and says "Yes, this'll do just fine. A busty lady with banding who deals direct damage to Zones!? Why this will be the star of my next set, and no one will ever believe you Kevin." Then he closes his Macbook, so his servant may move it out of the way, while another servant puts a Fetal Richard Garfield Clone lathered in Steak Sauce in front of him. Then Mark Feasts.
I mean, In KevinWorld, Mark is reading the very words I'm typing as well. Heck, in KevinWorld maybe I am Mark.
I'm beginning to think CKY may be anime in real life...
Don't go anywhere CKY, I need to crash dramatically through your window and propose marriage and I don't want you throwing off my paradrop.
[In response to a thread about how hard grading is]
Upon reading this, I've found myself completely unable to operate in the world. I tried to decide what to eat for breakfast, and pondered the vast consequences of my choice. How do I balance my dietary needs against my desire to eat good-tasting food? Should I factor in how long it takes to prepare? Cereal is ready in moments, but bacon takes longer to cook.
Then there is the impact on other industries. Do people in the cereal industry deserve to be employed more than people in the bacon industry? Which industry should I support? I don't even have the data regarding HOW MUCH the cereal industry benefits from me eating a bowl of cereal, or how much the bacon industry benefits from me eating a side of bacon. How can I compare two qualities I can't even quantify?
And let's not forget the milk on the cereal. In addition to determining whether or not milk is healthy for me, how much that benefits the milk industry, and how much the people in the milk industry deserve my support, we have to factor in the fact that cows are put under brutal conditions in order to collect thier milk. Of course, the same goes for the pigs, and then they get killed. Of course, I really like bacon. So I need to come up with a scale that compares the value of cow happiness to pig happiness to my happiness. What trade-offs am I willing to make here? Does the fact that the pig gets put out of its misery count as a plus or a minus? Isn't bacon bad for me anyway?
Deciding what to eat for breakfast (or any meal) is impossible. Help me!
I must admit chinkeeyong, you have the most interesting character ideas; and you play them well.
Anyway, you'd be surprised about Time Stop. When I first saw that card as a relatively new player I didn't see its full potential until I read the reminder text. Is it that unintuitive, though? Mine I mean. What is possibility? Is it possible for me to type these words with my tusks? No, because I don't have tusks. Although I am now tempted to go buy some - obviously not from poachers or whatever - and use them as typing apparatus. I could be the best secretary ever. "What's your words per minute sir?" "Well, only six, but I use these tusks to type them." "You're hired!" That was the interview. And is anyone else disappointed that "apparati" is not the plural form of apparatus? I just could strangle a dictionary, because "apparatuses" is a real word. I guess it sounds pretty cool. I'll call them my Apparatusks.
|
|
|