Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 3  •  1 2 3 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Palisade Giant and Damage Assingment
8 months ago  ::  Oct 01, 2012 - 10:47PM #1
Koyetsu
Date Joined: Oct 2, 2012
Posts: 3
This weekend at the prerelease there was a disagreement about how palisade giant worked. I think i have found in the comprehensive rules that I was correct however i am looking for confirmation on how this works for future problems.

Game State
NAP
4X 1/1 bird token
1x Palisade Giant

AP
4x 3/3 creatures

AP plays Rakdos Charm chosing to have each of opponents creatures deal 1 damage to him.
all damage redirects to giant he is now 2/7 (with 5 dmg assigned)
then AP attacks with 4x 3/3's. NAP choses not to block and claims that all damage dealt goes to the giant.
AP claims that not to be the case as the giant can only take 2 more damage and would only be able to
assign the damage of 1 of the 3/3's to it.

Tonight i decided to pull up the comprehensive rules and after reading the lawyerese, this is my current
understanding of what happens.
the attack happens and resolves. 4x 3 points of combat damage are assigned to the NAP. This triggers
Palisade Giant's ability and places 4 packets of 3 damage on the stack. the first will resolve. when it resolves
it checks conditions that placed it on the stack and resolves. Dealing 3 damage to the giant. at that point the giant dies.
the next packet goes to resolve, checks conditions and they no longer apply because the giant is dead. at that point
the damage would revert to original target do to an invalid condition of the damage being placed on the stack. the same
would happen with the 2 additional sets of combat damage.

This seems to be the way the rules read in combat damage, activated abilities, and resoving activated abilities
in the comprehensive rules. the result would not be an infinate combat damage shield but 9 damage being delt to player.
can someone, preferably a judge verify my understanding of the rules?
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 01, 2012 - 10:59PM #2
Segoth
Date Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Posts: 1,055
Please Autocard: [c]Palisade Giant[/c] = Palisade Giant
Rakdos Charm

That is not correct.  The palisade giant does not have a triggered ability, it has a replacement effect that redirectes damage to itself.  All damage done in combat (save first strike or double strike) is dealt at the same time so all 12 would be redirected to the palisade giant, it doesn't matter that it far exceeds the giants toughness.  After the damage is dealt state based actions are performed before a player would receive priority and destroy the palisade giant.  A replacement effect does not use the stack like a triggered ability does, all the damage is simply redirected instead of dealing the damage to the player. 
DCI Level 2 Judge
Rockford, Illinois
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 01, 2012 - 11:11PM #3
Koyetsu
Date Joined: Oct 2, 2012
Posts: 3
Question on this topic then.

Did wizards intend to give U/W an infinite combat shield?
Palisade Giant + Cackling Counterpart + populate
that was just the first combo i found like that.
with populate unless you have some direct removal you can only kill 1 giant a turn. i could have 40 creatures attacking and
never get through if they have Growing Ranks

seems a little crazy to be able to do this even if it would be a little difficult to start.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 01, 2012 - 11:19PM #4
Kenjiblade
Date Joined: May 6, 2011
Posts: 473
That's far from being remotely a viable combo, considering the cost of everything involved. If you manage to get it to happen for even a short time, congratulations are in order.

If it ever did become a problem, Detention Sphere or any sweeper would make short work of it.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 01, 2012 - 11:21PM #5
Segoth
Date Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Posts: 1,055

Oct 1, 2012 -- 11:11PM, Koyetsu wrote:


Did wizards intend to give U/W an infinite combat shield?




This is not a rules question.  You'd probably have better luck talking about this in cards and combo's.
 

DCI Level 2 Judge
Rockford, Illinois
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 01, 2012 - 11:23PM #6
ikegami
Date Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 2,231

510.1b An unblocked creature assigns its combat damage to the player or planeswalker it’s attacking. [...]


510.2. Second, all combat damage that’s been assigned is dealt simultaneously. This turn-based action doesn’t use the stack. [...]


"Four sources simultaneously deal 3 damage each to the NAP" becomes "four sources simultaneously deal 3 damage each to the Pallisade Giant".

As for your new question, I'm sure that repeatable populate leads to many powerful engines, but keep in mind that yours is shut down by either a creature removal or an enchantment removal.

Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 01, 2012 - 11:38PM #7
Koyetsu
Date Joined: Oct 2, 2012
Posts: 3
ok found the major confusion for me. i was treating it as a triggered ability. instead it's a static ability just didn't seem right and way overpowered for the cost to work that way.
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 02, 2012 - 9:31AM #8
Astarael7
Date Joined: Oct 15, 2009
Posts: 705
Triggered abilities are identified by the use of the words "when", "whenever", or "at". Replacement effects are usually identified by the word "instead", as in "If [something would happen], [something else happens] instead."
Rules Advisor as of 03/01/2013
Zammm = Batman
"Ability words are flavor text for Melvins." -- Fallingman
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 02, 2012 - 10:59AM #9
Strago_Magus
Date Joined: Oct 9, 2009
Posts: 1,057
If Palisade Giant dies during the first strike damage step, any attacking creatures that did not deal combat damage during first strike damage will deal their damage to the defending player or planeswalker.
Rules Advisor

   
   
        height="100" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
    pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer"/>
Quick Reply
Cancel
8 months ago  ::  Oct 02, 2012 - 11:42AM #10
ikegami
Date Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 2,231
Cause then the damage won't be simultaneous, but across two steps. Any seven damage that's done before the combat damage would do it, not just First Strike.
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  1 2 3 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing