|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 3:38PM
#21
|
- UnCon Prizewinner 2008
- Infernal Spawn of Infernal Spawn of Evil
- Chairman of the Board
Date Joined:
Jul 29, 2006
|
I missed the play to lose bit, in fact i'm not sure the cards I chose can lose to those...
Edit: They can, sort of.
your decks is meant to beat at least one of the test decks, which it does, so you're fine there
if you want to submit another deck then feel free though
firstrike
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 4:55PM
#22
|
Date Joined:
Oct 28, 2011
|
Does no one else think it is not worth it to lose to one of the test decks? By making a ridulous deck that beats both by a long shot, you will win more matches, and thus the three points are irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 4:56PM
#23
|
Date Joined:
Mar 23, 2006
|
Does no one else think it is not worth it to lose to one of the test decks? By making a ridulous deck that beats both by a long shot, you will win more matches, and thus the three points are irrelevant.
you misunderstand.
in order for your deck to qualify it must beat a test deck.
however, in scoring matches, the point values for losses and wins are reversed.
120.6. Some effects replace card draws.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 5:01PM
#24
|
- UnCon Prizewinner 2008
- Infernal Spawn of Infernal Spawn of Evil
- Chairman of the Board
Date Joined:
Jul 29, 2006
|
Does no one else think it is not worth it to lose to one of the test decks? By making a ridulous deck that beats both by a long shot, you will win more matches, and thus the three points are irrelevant.
you misunderstand.
in order for your deck to qualify it must beat a test deck.
however, in scoring matches, the point values for losses and wins are reversed.
yup
firstrike
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 5:02PM
#25
|
Date Joined:
Oct 28, 2011
|
What I'm trying to say is if I run
land
ritual
power creature
and obliterate both decks, then there is no point in stooping to lose to one, because I will just win every match afterwards
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 5:03PM
#26
|
- UnCon Prizewinner 2008
- Infernal Spawn of Infernal Spawn of Evil
- Chairman of the Board
Date Joined:
Jul 29, 2006
|
What I'm trying to say is if I run
land
ritual
power creature
and obliterate both decks, then there is no point in stooping to lose to one, because I will just win every match afterwards
and then you'll get no points, because in this format you get points for losing matches
firstrike
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 5:03PM
#27
|
Date Joined:
Oct 28, 2011
|
oooooooh, I see. Ignore my PM shrimp.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 02, 2012 - 5:07PM
#28
|
- UnCon Prizewinner 2008
- Infernal Spawn of Infernal Spawn of Evil
- Chairman of the Board
Date Joined:
Jul 29, 2006
|
sure, send in a new deck if you like
firstrike
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 03, 2012 - 7:13AM
#29
|
- UnCon 3CM Master
- UnCon Prize Stealer
Date Joined:
Jun 20, 2003
|
Ofc, that I won't host anymore doesn't mean I won't play anymore.
Just...whenever I have some free time to think of something. Like now.
 Also, I fully agree with the mafia MVP... JaC is too damn hard to catch as scum. Even when I started being sure he was scum, I was not sure and had to invent some plans to fish for reactions... which he would have probably passed and I would have had nothing to use against him...
Oh yes, JaC's a genius at this.
|
|
|
|
8 months ago ::
Oct 03, 2012 - 10:38AM
#30
|
- UnCon 3CM Master
- UnCon Prize Stealer
Date Joined:
Jun 20, 2003
|
Almost like real magic, right? There's never a deck that always wins.
Btw, please use the edit button in the future.
Also, I fully agree with the mafia MVP... JaC is too damn hard to catch as scum. Even when I started being sure he was scum, I was not sure and had to invent some plans to fish for reactions... which he would have probably passed and I would have had nothing to use against him...
Oh yes, JaC's a genius at this.
|
|
|
Woot! Go RED! I love red! Red is awesome! Did I mention I love red? 
