|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 11:01AM
#41
|
Date Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
|
Discussing lists before a round is over is specifically prohibited.
By the Time Police.
Don't mess with the Teselecta, bro. They're pretty hardcore.
Etiamnunc sto, etiamsi caelum ruat.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 11:32AM
#42
|
|
|
I'll try lulz
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 11:45AM
#43
|
- UnCon Prizewinner 2008
- …mmm
Date Joined:
Jan 20, 2008
|
Don't mess with the Teselecta, bro. They're pretty hardcore.
SUPERJAIL, PLEB.
lel♯ jenk♯ ∞
Show
I'm the world's leading astrophysicist. You can trust me, because I said I was.
What's wrong with my formating?
you make paragraphs shorter than the page width
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 12:43PM
#44
|
|
|
By no turn 1 kills in this case, do you mean 1 turn loses?
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 1:34PM
#45
|
Date Joined:
Mar 23, 2006
|
By no turn 1 kills in this case, do you mean 1 turn loses?
you will never take an action that causes you to lose. therefore, you can't possibly lose before your opponent has done something.
120.6. Some effects replace card draws.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 2:18PM
#46
|
Date Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
|
By no turn 1 kills in this case, do you mean 1 turn loses?
you will never take an action that causes you to lose. therefore, you can't possibly lose before your opponent has done something.
Mountain, Mana Clash  . Technically "capable" of winning, and "perfect play" doesn't prevent you from playing it, but because of the rules you will always lose.
Etiamnunc sto, etiamsi caelum ruat.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 3:40PM
#47
|
- UnCon Prizewinner 2008
- Infernal Spawn of Infernal Spawn of Evil
- Chairman of the Board
Date Joined:
Jul 29, 2006
|
By no turn 1 kills in this case, do you mean 1 turn loses?
you will never take an action that causes you to lose. therefore, you can't possibly lose before your opponent has done something.
Mountain, Mana Clash . Technically "capable" of winning, and "perfect play" doesn't prevent you from playing it, but because of the rules you will always lose.
Rule 5 in the OP states
5. If a random effect (i.e. a coinflip) is owned by a player, its outcome is chosen by the opponent.
so Mana Clash isn't actually capable of winning, so it's not legal
firstrike
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 4:08PM
#48
|
- UnCon Prizewinner 2008
- Infernal Spawn of Infernal Spawn of Evil
- Chairman of the Board
Date Joined:
Jul 29, 2006
|
by the way guys, a couple of people (including myself) are interested in changing the discard rule. Currently any deck that can potentially force the opponent to discard/exile more than 1 card is illegal, but we're interested in changing that to only ban multi-discard on a single turn. (i.e. repeatable discard effects would be fine as long as you can only use them once a turn.) does anyone have any objections to that?
firstrike
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.
This definitely doesn't mean what you think it means.
I was referring to the painting The Treachery of Images.
I know.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 4:37PM
#49
|
Date Joined:
Mar 23, 2006
|
by the way guys, a couple of people (including myself) are interested in changing the discard rule. Currently any deck that can potentially force the opponent to discard/exile more than 1 card is illegal, but we're interested in changing that to only ban multi-discard on a single turn. (i.e. repeatable discard effects would be fine as long as you can only use them once a turn.) does anyone have any objections to that?
I do because you want to
120.6. Some effects replace card draws.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Oct 04, 2012 - 6:32PM
#50
|
Date Joined:
Jun 28, 2008
|
By no turn 1 kills in this case, do you mean 1 turn loses?
you will never take an action that causes you to lose. therefore, you can't possibly lose before your opponent has done something.
Mountain, Mana Clash . Technically "capable" of winning, and "perfect play" doesn't prevent you from playing it, but because of the rules you will always lose.
Rule 5 in the OP states
5. If a random effect (i.e. a coinflip) is owned by a player, its outcome is chosen by the opponent.
so Mana Clash isn't actually capable of winning, so it's not legal
Ah, but your opponent is still trying to win the game, so your opponent would choose for you to lose every coinflip, so it would be an effective tactic if it didn't lose to both base decks.
"I think me going Bang bang bang I win is pretty intuitive" Mafia Record: Wouldn't you like to know? 2011 Mafia Awards - Mastermind of the Year mymoment
Show
|
|
|
