|
9 months ago ::
Sep 27, 2012 - 3:50PM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Aug 17, 2012
|
Anyone intrested in having another 2HG tournament go on for xbox? I'm willing to host it if we get enough people wanting to do it.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 27, 2012 - 4:14PM
#2
|
|
|
Yes I would, I was going to run one after the other xbox tourney but if someone else was willing to run one I would play. Do you know what the format would be?
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 27, 2012 - 4:16PM
#3
|
Date Joined:
Aug 17, 2012
|
Yes I would, I was going to run one after the other xbox tourney but if someone else was willing to run one I would play. Do you know what the format would be?
Well I have never ran one myself so if you're more experienced then more power to you. I'm undecided on what format I want to run.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 27, 2012 - 4:54PM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Sep 10, 2012
|
I'm down for some 2HG.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 27, 2012 - 7:38PM
#5
|
Date Joined:
Aug 20, 2012
|
id be interested just messege me or send freind request if want to contact me. thankx
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 28, 2012 - 6:09AM
#6
|
|
|
The main question I think is whether you want this to be a test of adaptability, or deck building.
If it's adaptability, then you allow deck changes between rounds. If deck building, then you must keep your combo throughout the tourney (although you can change the build between rounds, as it'd be impossible to police that)
I personally think keeping the same decks is better. Not everyone has all the decks unlocked, and you open yourself to counterpicking otherwise, with the people who have unlocked everything having an advantage.
Or maybe a combination of both? Limit it down to 1 to 3 decks that you can bring into the tournament. Your opponent can the try to guess at which ones you'll be using. I can't think of a reason why this idea wouldn't work. I agree with Stevo about not allowing all decks to be used from round to round.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 28, 2012 - 6:40AM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Jun 26, 2012
|
the last tourny i was in was best of 2 out of 3 and you had to pick 3 decks then you played with one. I didnt like the fact that when 1 game was done you could not change decks
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 28, 2012 - 6:43AM
#8
|
|
|
I think being able to change decks out of a selection of 3 is a good idea but I also like the deck selection being reduced to 3. This helps to prevent counter decking and puts more focus on the builds of the deck like Stevo said.
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 28, 2012 - 6:53AM
#9
|
|
|
How about you pick 5 decks per team and either player can use any of those 5 decks?
|
|
|
|
9 months ago ::
Sep 28, 2012 - 7:05AM
#10
|
Date Joined:
Jun 26, 2012
|
I understand about builds but if you are playing 2 out of three you should be able to play with a different deck the second game. I dont see the point in not allowing the players to swicth decks .Also to post your decks that you are using gives ur op a chance to build around it.
|
|
|
