Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Switch to Forum Live View 30 creature vampire deck?
9 months ago  ::  Sep 08, 2012 - 3:07AM #1
lordworm599
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2012
Posts: 10

Hi, I'm having a slight problem balancing my vampire deck. I posted here because it's in modern format. Would running 30 creatures be any bad? I'm focusing mainly on aggro, but I like having a bit more of a backup incase Nocturnus can't get the job done, which unfortunately seems to have happened a lot. This is the deck here.


Creatures (28 x ) 
2 x Malakir Bloodwitch
3 x Vampire Nocturnus
3 x Stromkirk Captain
3 x Gatekeeper of Malakir
2 x Kalastria Highborn
3 x Bloodghast
2 x Viscera Seer
2 x Ghuul Draz Vampires
4 x Vampire Lacerator
4 x Pulse Tracker 

Spells (11 x )

2 x Tendrils of Corruption
2 x Go for the Throat
2 x Doom Blade
3 x Sign in Blood

Lands (21 x )

15 x Swamp
4 x Dragonskull Summit
2 x Verdant Catacombs

 
Malakir Bloodwitch is always helping me big time, shes great when I have tons of 1 drops and being my only 5 drop she usually bombs the field on turn 5 or 6. Nocturnus doesn't always rape and having 4 I would often draw him too early, and he's not amazing on his own.

Stromkirk Captain is one I really want to play 4. I was running 4 before and it's nice to give my weaker Vamps first strike and +1/+1 on turn 3. But running 3 seems to work cause I don't want him on turn 1 and he requires the Dragonskull Summit. Gatekeeper is awesone but he is another removal so I think 3 is fine, I also don't want him turn 1.

 

Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 08, 2012 - 3:26AM #2
Alias402
Date Joined: Jun 26, 2012
Posts: 771
[*deck]
Deck list
[*/deck]

Remove the "*", Try that then put your texts after the deck.
Stop deleting my posts you jackwagon!
Dictators prefer an unarmed population.
MTGS, for all your nazi loving needs.
Thank you SO much for turning Magic standard into Yugioh.
Decks I playSpoiler: Show

Legacy TezzFinity
Modern Burn
Extended Infect
EDH - Heartless Hidetsugu
T2-dead

Jul 9, 2012 -- 7:22PM, CadaverousBl00m wrote:


Yes, but DOES HE PEE COLOURLESS MANA?



Modern is not an eternal format!
https://www.wizards.com/Magic/Magazine/Article.aspx?x=judge/resources/banned

Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 08, 2012 - 8:33PM #3
lordworm599
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2012
Posts: 10
Ah I see, done now.
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 09, 2012 - 2:41AM #4
Kaden_Shadows
Date Joined: May 16, 2011
Posts: 112

Sep 8, 2012 -- 3:07AM, lordworm599 wrote:


Hi, I'm having a slight problem balancing my vampire deck. I posted here because it's in modern format. Would running 30 creatures be any bad? I'm focusing mainly on aggro, but I like having a bit more of a backup incase Nocturnus can't get the job done, which unfortunately seems to have happened a lot. This is the deck here.


Creatures (28 x ) 
2 x Malakir Bloodwitch
3 x Vampire Nocturnus
3 x Stromkirk Captain
3 x Gatekeeper of Malakir
2 x Kalastria Highborn
3 x Bloodghast
2 x Viscera Seer
2 x Ghuul Draz Vampires
4 x Vampire Lacerator
4 x Pulse Tracker 

Spells (11 x )

2 x Tendrils of Corruption
2 x Go for the Throat
2 x Doom Blade
3 x Sign in Blood

Lands (21 x )

15 x Swamp
4 x Dragonskull Summit
2 x Verdant Catacombs

 
Malakir Bloodwitch is always helping me big time, shes great when I have tons of 1 drops and being my only 5 drop she usually bombs the field on turn 5 or 6. Nocturnus doesn't always rape and having 4 I would often draw him too early, and he's not amazing on his own.

Stromkirk Captain is one I really want to play 4. I was running 4 before and it's nice to give my weaker Vamps first strike and +1/+1 on turn 3. But running 3 seems to work cause I don't want him on turn 1 and he requires the Dragonskull Summit. Gatekeeper is awesone but he is another removal so I think 3 is fine, I also don't want him turn 1.

 


OK, I gotta ask, as a fan of Vamp decks, myself:

Why no Vampire Nighthawk ? He's fantastic, and a good attack deterrent, too.
My sugggested decklist:

Creatures (28 x )
2 x Malakir Bloodwitch
2 x Vampire Nocturnus
4 x Stromkirk Captain
4 x Gatekeeper of Malakir
3 x Kalastria Highborn
3 x Bloodghast
4 x Vampire Nighthawk
2 x Ghuul Draz Vampires
3 x Vampire Lacerator
3 x Pulse Tracker

Spells (11 x )

2 x Tendrils of Corruption
4x Murder (yeah, I know it costs more, but there aren't any resterictions on it.)
3 x Sign in Blood

Lands (21 x ) I usually run 24 lands, but you seem to be doing all right on the mana department.

15 x Swamp
4 x Dragonskull Summit
2 x Verdant Catacombs

Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 09, 2012 - 9:10PM #5
lordworm599
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2012
Posts: 10

Well, I sideboard 2 Nighthawks, and while he is great, he seems to me to be more of a defensive card. I find myself having him as a dead draw in my hand because often on turn 3 or 4 I would be better off dropping a Stromkirk Captain and beefing up all my other vamps. I side 2 incase I go against an aggro heavy deck.


As for Murder, yeah it has no restrictions but in the meta I face with this deck no one runs much black or artifact creatures. Would you say Tendrils is better than Feast of Blood? I was running 2 Feasts before but I'm not too sure, I like that Tendrils is an instant and doesn't require me to have 2 Vamps or more in play. The cost is the only problem.

Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 10, 2012 - 5:08PM #6
Kaden_Shadows
Date Joined: May 16, 2011
Posts: 112

Sep 9, 2012 -- 9:10PM, lordworm599 wrote:


Well, I sideboard 2 Nighthawks, and while he is great, he seems to me to be more of a defensive card. I find myself having him as a dead draw in my hand because often on turn 3 or 4 I would be better off dropping a Stromkirk Captain and beefing up all my other vamps. I side 2 incase I go against an aggro heavy deck.


As for Murder, yeah it has no restrictions but in the meta I face with this deck no one runs much black or artifact creatures. Would you say Tendrils is better than Feast of Blood? I was running 2 Feasts before but I'm not too sure, I like that Tendrils is an instant and doesn't require me to have 2 Vamps or more in play. The cost is the only problem.


I ran 3 of each when I had my old Vamp deck. And I've usually used Feast a lot more often, but that might just be me.

As for Nighthawk, I use him both on defense and offense. He's a lifelinker, so you get healed every time he swings, and if you drop him on turn 4, you can have a Stromkirk Captain out already, and drop a Viscera or some such at the same time. I dunno, I just love the card, he's been in every incarnation of my Vampire deck from day 1.

My usual plays go like this:

Turn 1: Swamp, Lacerator, pass.
Turn 2: Swamp, Blood Artist, swing with Lacerator, pass.
Turn 3: Mountain/Dragonskull, Stromkirk Captain, swing with Lacerator, pass.
Turn 4: Land (any), Nighthawk, some one-drop, swing with Lacerator and Captain, pass.
Turn 5: Land, Blade of the Bloodchief , equip to Nighthawk, swing for the fence, pass if they live.
Turn 6: If possible, Damnation and Darksteel Plate on the Nighthawk. Swing for the win.

Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 10, 2012 - 7:39PM #7
lordworm599
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2012
Posts: 10
Yeah Hawk is great but I think it's better to drop a Nocturnus on turn 4. Then Bloodwitch if it gets to turn 5 or 6 to allow you to remain competetive late game. I definitely bring Hawk for multiplayer and drop Lacerators.
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 10, 2012 - 11:52PM #8
Vanbee
Date Joined: Apr 18, 2012
Posts: 69
My suggestions...
Cut:
Sign in Blood and some creature removal
Add in:
Inquisition of Kozilek
Lightning Bolt
Blightning
Vampire Nighthawk
and you'll need to add more red
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Sep 11, 2012 - 2:34AM #9
lordworm599
Date Joined: Sep 8, 2012
Posts: 10

Sep 10, 2012 -- 11:52PM, Vanbee wrote:

My suggestions...
Cut:
Sign in Blood and some creature removal
Add in:
Inquisition of Kozilek
Lightning Bolt
Blightning
Vampire Nighthawk
and you'll need to add more red





I would love to run Lightning Bolts but the fact that it's pure red hurts my Nocturnus. Inquisition is nice, I suppose I can swap Duress from my SB for those. Blightning seems good too. But I'm still pretty set on Nighthawk being better on the SB.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing