Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Switch to Forum Live View 2012 Players Championship
9 months ago  ::  Aug 27, 2012 - 5:01PM #1
WotC_Greg
Date Joined: Jul 6, 2006
Posts: 51
This thread is to discuss the 2012 Players Championship, coming to you from Seattle. This 16-player, three-day event begins Wednesday, August 29 and concludes Friday, August 31. The live video stream begins at 2:45 p.m. ET Wednesday -- visit the webcast page to find start times in your area.

Wednesday features three rounds of Cube Draft and three rounds of Modern.
Thursday features three rounds of Magic 2013 Booster Draft and three rounds of Modern.
Friday features the Top 4 playing Modern, all to determine the Player of the Year.

Featured Players:
Paulo Vitor Damo da Rosa
Reid Duke
Samuele Estratti
Jon Finkel
Alexander Hayne
Jun'ya Iyanaga
Martin Juza
Brian Kibler
Tzu-Ching Kuo
David Ochoa
Shuhei Nakamura
Luis Scott-Vargas
Owen Turtenwald
Josh Utter-Leyton
Yuuya Watanabe
Shouta Yasooka
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 29, 2012 - 1:58AM #2
Ninjoma
Date Joined: Feb 1, 2010
Posts: 1
Can people come spectate this event in person?
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 29, 2012 - 12:30PM #3
sperry
Date Joined: Jan 6, 2006
Posts: 1,819
The video coverage keeps panning away from the player drafting and we can't see what they're picking.
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 29, 2012 - 2:02PM #4
bob_the_wonder_Beeble
Date Joined: Feb 1, 2003
Posts: 606
This MAX _______ segment is excruciating. Although at least now I've learned that smokestack is MAX FUN.
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 30, 2012 - 12:05AM #5
Amarsir
Date Joined: Oct 28, 2006
Posts: 2,711
Is there an intelligent reason why this event was made to be Wednesday - Friday?  Was it so that would-be fans who expect a weekend tournament would miss the first day or two?  If so, well done!  Though the scheduler really should share credit with everyone who decided not to promote the dates more heavily.  Until today's mothership headline saying day 1 is over, I had absolutely no idea.
Free MTGO Tournaments you should be playing:
Pauper (all commons) - Tuesday Nights, prizes by MTGOTraders
Peasant (Pauper + 5 uncommons, with paper rarity) - Sunday Nights, prizes by MTGOTraders
Silverblack (Modern-era Commons and Uncommons - Most Wednesday nights, prizes by MTGO Bazaar
Heirloom ("Cheap" cards only, e.g. rares under 20 cents) - Sunday afternoons, sponsored by MTGOTraders
Check the superbly-made Gatherling site for more.

Other games you should try:
Spectromancer - Online card game by Richard Garfield, available cheap on Steam.
DC Universe Online - action-based MMO.  Free to play.  Surprised me how well designed it is.
Simunomics - Free-to-play economy simulation game.
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 30, 2012 - 5:30AM #6
mallemout
Date Joined: Dec 16, 2003
Posts: 113
I second what amarsir said. I also had no idea this started on wednesday until I saw the headline today. And I still do not see this as a world championship. This is a great way to end player of the year, it really is with a high level of play. But for me a world championship gathers the best players from every country in a big event, not by a 16 person hard cut. I think my biggest problem with this is that now all the players now each other fairly well and the amount of surprise is very low now. This takes away all the drama that should go with a WC. Here, anyone losing to one of the others is not a shock defeat, it's just another win/loss. If , lets say Jon Finkel, lost to the champion of Luxemburg , now that would be a shock defeat. There would also be a more varied field of decks, making it that more interesting. It just feels wrong that at a WC , with the enormous community magic has, only 16 players can attend.

Now this player of the year decider seems to be very interesting, nice combination of formats. It almost seems shocking to see PvD on 3-3 , but then you look at the player list and who are above him and you go like, okay, that seems reasonable. Gonna be interesting to see who is gonna be the best come friday.
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 30, 2012 - 11:59PM #7
kcostell
Date Joined: Apr 24, 2006
Posts: 157
I'm curious why they didn't just add 3 rounds and make it a full round-robin instead of doing this 12 round swiss.  As it stands, some players on 21 points (Finkel, Nakamura) had to play Yasooka twice, while Watanabe didn't even face him once.  

 
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 31, 2012 - 9:20AM #8
Tymestalker
Date Joined: Aug 11, 2008
Posts: 1,040

Aug 30, 2012 -- 11:59PM, kcostell wrote:

I'm curious why they didn't just add 3 rounds and make it a full round-robin instead of doing this 12 round swiss.  As it stands, some players on 21 points (Finkel, Nakamura) had to play Yasooka twice, while Watanabe didn't even face him once.  

 




I totally agree.  The old Invitationals were round robin so you played each player once (until the finals) and that seems much more fair

Those who fear the darkness have never seen what the light can do.

I've seen angels fall from blinding heights.
But you yourself are nothing so divine.
Just next in line.
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 31, 2012 - 1:37PM #9
kiseki
Date Joined: Feb 1, 2011
Posts: 18
I'm listening to the Yasooka interview, and HATS OFF TO INTERPRETOR!
He had to be able to speak Japanese Magic AND English Magic!
Well done! 
Quick Reply
Cancel
9 months ago  ::  Aug 31, 2012 - 3:32PM #10
Amadeus8574
Date Joined: Sep 4, 2008
Posts: 25
Marshall Sutcliffe and Sheldon Menery - sweet analysis. Excellent announcers - very enjoyable to watch. Great job!
Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing