Community

This is disappointing. This is really, really disappointing. As SadisticMystic pointed out above, turning the format into creatures-only DOESN'T encourage creature interaction. It turns it into one of the following:

1. I have the advantage in creatures, so I can attack without fear. If he blocks, I trade favorably; if he tries to race, I win.
2. I do not have the advantage in creatures, so I cannot attack. I'm just going to wait to drop Bomby Mythic Rare and then win.
3. I have a creature with evasion, so I'm going to attack with that and leave everything else back.
4. I am playing a heavy aggro deck like RDW, so blocking does not exist. I am going to attack every turn unless there's a really persuasive reason not to.

As you see, NONE of those involve complex combat calculations. There's no calculated risk in straight-up creature fights. You know that you're going to win or lose, barring combat tricks, which continue to get worse (no Giant Growth, depleting stores of removal, HEXPROOF EVERYWHERE). So you attack when it's advantageous, and don't when it's not. This translates to a lot of racing and stalling, and very little actual interaction.

Another problem is how important it is who goes first when creatures are involved. Here are two examples using mirrors in today's popular decks:

First, RG Aggro. Player 1 lands Huntmaster of the Fells. Player 2 lands Huntmaster of the Fells. Player 1 untaps, draws, plays a land, and passes turn. During Player 2's upkeep, Player 1's Huntmaster flips first and snipes the enemy Huntmaster, putting him in a commanding lead. This is a commonly accepted scenario for this mirror, and one in which the player who is on the play has an immense advantage.

Second, UW Delver. The player who goes second is always on the back foot in many, many ways. He's ALWAYS going to be behind in tempo, barring extreme luck. He can't make calculated decisions to hold back mana for a counterspell, because his opponent will always end up in the lead. His opponent can wait until turn 4 and then hold mana for a Restoration Angel or Mana Leak, knowing he already has the advantage in tempo. Everything goes the way of the player who plays first.

When Control and Combo are involved, it isn't this cut and dry. The cards from the Control player traditionally have more power, because they are answers rather than threats. They are able to neutralize threats for less mana, and will often generate card advantage.  This is fine, because the Control player is on the back foot for the whole game until they stabilize and land a finisher like Mahamoti Djinn: nothing more than a big body that's on-color. Combo similarly likes having more cards because it means they have more pieces of the puzzle, although it's also happy going first because then it can get the combo off earlier.

The final issue with this stupid creature metagame is the way it's being implemented: with huge, swingy creatures. A player lands a Titan, and everything's pretty much over. If you look at the best Control decks in the format, they pretty much boil down to: turn 1-3 play a couple of target removal spells and some acceleration, turn 4 play a sweeper, turn 5 or 6 drop a Titan and hope it's enough. These dumb creatures are now HOW you stabilize, not what you do ONCE you've stabilized. The reason that's inappropriate is that it makes the game much more luck-reliant. In a standard Control-Aggro matchup, Aggro just needs to get ONE creature to stick in order to win. It matters much less which creature it is. Similarly, Control needs just ONE removal spell to stabilize. It matters much less which removal spell it is. Now, it's about whether you can get the right creature AND enough land to play it. But once you do play it, the game ends. That's wildly inappropriate, because games suddenly become luck-of-the-draw. How dull. Don't get me started on Delver. Some games, it flips on turn 2 and you have a 7-turn clock starting right off the bat (more like 4 once that Runechanter's Pike gets equipped). Some games, it never flips and it's a vanilla 1/1 in a tempo deck. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

I really hope you guys at Wizards realize soon how terrible this is for the metagame. You're turning the game into Sorcery-speed, when all interaction happens at Instant-speed. You're turning it into a topdeckfest. You're turning it into Delver Goldfish, instead of the calculations of Control. It's just sad.

EDIT: Oh, I forgot about Bonfire of the Damned. You know, maybe it isn't a problem with a creature-centric metagame. Maybe it's just that R&D is terrible at making cards these days. That could be it too.

Another article showing that the people behind the game know very little about it. Look at the format that most people woudl say is the best, Modern, why is it good? Because there is aggro, combo and control.

So they've intentionally made the format worse, control is very interactive, it's the most interactive archetype, so it's worth having in the format for sure. What about Combo? How is ramp more interactive than something like Twin was? Answer is that it isn't.

You can't remove two thirds of the game and make it better.

To barrow a part of a movie quote.

NOT EVEN WOTC KNOWS WHAT THERE DOING!

I...I have no words...*shakes head*