|
11 months ago ::
Jul 28, 2012 - 2:02AM
#1
|
Date Joined:
Mar 10, 2010
|
Has any thought been given to bringing back "put into a graveyard from the battlefield"? I know what R&D wanted to accomplish with "dies" but I see newer players getting confused more, it seems, by "dies" ... People wondering if Exile counts as dying, sacrifice, does a creature die if it's regenerated... And some of those came up even with the old wording. But... Meh. Wordy as it may have been, I kind of miss it.
I find it much easier to tell a new player "put into a graveyard from the battlefield means exactly what it says" - I don't need to tell them what it doesn't mean. Nobody I've talked to thinks something that triggers when a creature "is put into a graveyard from the battlefield" somehow doesn't trigger if that creature is sacrificed or Legend-ruled or whatever.
...On the other hand, when I explain to a new player what "dies" means... I then have to answer their questions - easy task of course - and explain what "dies" doesn't mean. "well does exile mean die?" or "so if I sacrifice Goblin Arsonist does it trigger, since it wasn't destroyed?"
And for those of us who know better, it sounds silly and it's sometimes hard to imagine how these people could actually think these things. But hey I remember learning the game. And I remember coming to the Rules Q&A forum and man... If I could look back at some of the things I asked, I'd slap myself so hard. I just think, even though it takes up more space, "is put into a graveyard from the battlefield" is a lot easier to explain to a new player because you don't actually have to explain anything. There was, IMO, less confusion.
Sean Stackhouse Level Two Judge (Yay!) Maine
|
|
|
|
11 months ago ::
Jul 28, 2012 - 3:50AM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Jan 13, 2011
|
I agree. Perhaps it has shortened some templates, but the sideffect is more confussion about the rules. Overall, I think that it was a bad choice.
|
|
|
|
11 months ago ::
Jul 28, 2012 - 10:00AM
#3
|
|
|
Its also weird that undying creature die.
|
|
|
|
11 months ago ::
Jul 28, 2012 - 10:55AM
#4
|
|
|
Its also weird that undying creature die.
Well they do undie afterward
|
|
|
|
11 months ago ::
Jul 28, 2012 - 8:28PM
#5
|
|
|
Its also weird that undying creature die.
Well they do undie afterward
yes they do.
|
|
|
|
10 months ago ::
Aug 13, 2012 - 1:07PM
#6
|
Date Joined:
Mar 10, 2010
|
Another question in Q&A reminded me about this... Figured it's worth bumping. Especially since the question WAS a Goblin Arsonist sacrifice lol. Perhaps something that can go into planning when Innistrad block is about to roll out of standard next year? I mean, assumptions are dangerous but I assume "dies" was mostly a flavor thing to play with the Innistrad block's "Undying"... Meh. I just miss the old, wordier but simpler text...
Sean Stackhouse Level Two Judge (Yay!) Maine
|
|
|
|
10 months ago ::
Aug 13, 2012 - 1:17PM
#7
|
Date Joined:
Jul 31, 2011
|
I'm actually on the opposite side of the feeling. I like "dies". I mean seems like common sense to me. A lightning bolt just caused your goblin to explode, I think its dead. Hey sacrifice your goat to summon that demon and by sacrifice I mean kill it! Hey, go away and never come back, I just exiled you but your not dead.
I think the confusion is what people "want" to happen and what is really "suppose" to happen.
Like the whole rediculas thing about Cavern of Souls. I mean really give someone credit. If they name humans and they use Cavern of Souls to cast a human assume you can't counter it. I mean really... really people. Oh but they didn't specify so he could have used colorless... judge judge. Gawd people try to find anything to give them a win and to me it just makes them look like a horrible human being.
So I'll leave you with this, what does it mean to you when someone says, "died"
|
|
|
|
10 months ago ::
Aug 13, 2012 - 1:22PM
#8
|
|
|
I would have preferred buried coming back. Probably end up confusing new players reading older cards. But I thought it was more in line with going to the yard from play.
|
|
|
|
10 months ago ::
Aug 13, 2012 - 1:34PM
#9
|
- Celestial Teapots are broken!
Date Joined:
Feb 24, 2007
|
I think there are distinct drawbacks to ''dies''. It's perfectly clear that something that says to exile a permanent doesn't cause it to die, but those effects that replace dying with exile somehow feel odd. That is, it's unintuitive that Murder doesn't cause the creature to die when there's a Leyline of the Void . Also, having different templates for creatures vs non-creatures is annoying, but I understand why they do that. Despite these issues, I think it is an overall benefit.
|
|
|
|
10 months ago ::
Aug 13, 2012 - 1:37PM
#10
|
Date Joined:
Jul 28, 2010
|
it allows more room on the card, that in my opinion offsets the minor inconsistencies
proud member of the 2011 community team
|
|
|