Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 5 of 20  •  Prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 20 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Thragtusk is giving me a headache
11 months ago  ::  Jul 18, 2012 - 6:42PM #41
javert
Date Joined: Jul 26, 2006
Posts: 1,313
Oh please.

After getting stuck on several months of Delver we finally get out of that hole only for people to stat claiming somehow diversity doesn't count and the format is bad because they say so.

The only bomb cards in the format are Bonfire of the Damned and to a lesser extent Revenge of the Hunted. Sure, Miracle sucks and will probably going to end in the unplayable or unfun camp before it rotates, but it is certainly not Jace level ubiquitous. You can play something without them and expect to play against decks without them.

You can't possibly be that naive. Just because the next set has "Ravnica" in it it doesn't mean the format is going to magically flourish into dozens of different archetypes. First, we have to pray Ravnica doesn't get treated like Mirrodin so we will have "all the fun of Ravnica like Simic Sky Swaller 2.0 and super enhanced Autochton Wurm without none of the unfun evil cards like Mortify and Remand*". Even if that doesn't happen, you really need to explain how the new removal and permission is supposed to make control good instead of just making Delver be all over the place again.

My take is that the only way to accomplish it is to reinforce red and black without helping blue and white, so U / W Delver doesn't get benefits at all. That is very unlikely since black and red had been nerfed as of late for being the evil removal colors. Thus, it is impossible to have the "diversity" (asuming it doesn't actually mean x control or tempo winning all day long) you want without having cards banned. At best we will get a format like the current one, take it or leave it.

*Remand as a card that makes the format healthy is way overrated, but you get the point.
If Limited gets in the way of printing good Constructed cards...

Screw limited
Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 18, 2012 - 6:42PM #42
Burning_Forest
Date Joined: Aug 8, 2008
Posts: 11,394

Jul 18, 2012 -- 6:02PM, animatics wrote:

Suggestion filed xD



Hope you guys are right about October and Wizards have those thoughts in mind.

Cheers



if nothing else, it looks sexy

Blue is the best color ever.  How do you deal?

Team GFG - "gulf, foxtrot, gulf"   Twitter: Burning_Forest

------------------------------------------------------

I started making some Dubstep and Electronica. 
Check me out here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXLxlHeE1rg

My Channel:

http://www.youtube.com/user/whitefender69?feature=mhee


It is a little bit chill. Let me know what you think.


Photobucket
Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 18, 2012 - 6:58PM #43
animatics
Date Joined: Feb 19, 2008
Posts: 1,036


Maybe opposed colors fit the card name flavor better and don't fuel UW... while giving it harder casting conditions.
Still, neither Red or Green have much to do with "Exile" do they? Well, Red has Incenerate..

Cheers
Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 18, 2012 - 7:30PM #44
The_Mirror_Owl
Date Joined: Jul 14, 2010
Posts: 654
UW is the only way that makes sense pie-wise.  But heck, I'm all for a copy in all the guild colors.  Creatures are just getting stupid.

Or like, maybe they could print something that encouraged alternative strategies again.  Like, not more busted creatures.

Jun 19, 2012 -- 8:50PM, catowner wrote:

Welcome to 2012.  Blue has the most efficient creatures, black has the all-in monocolored aggro deck, the most controlling deck in the format is green-red, control decks lose to aggro in attrition wars, and counterspells aren't an answer to fatties.

Sep 22, 2012 -- 5:59PM, Islands wrote:


Pack Rat is like Bitterblossom and Tarmogoyf had a black baby.

Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 18, 2012 - 10:20PM #45
iamajellydonut
  • UnCon Prizewinner 2008
  • …mmm
Date Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Posts: 7,192
Who the hell names "Beast" with Cavern of Souls?
lel♯ jenk♯ ∞ Show


I'm the world's leading astrophysicist. You can trust me, because I said I was.

Oct 11, 2012 -- 9:16AM, Enigma256 wrote:

Oct 11, 2012 -- 8:50AM, Chaikov wrote:

What's wrong with my formating?

you make paragraphs shorter than the page width


Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 19, 2012 - 12:58AM #46
animatics
Date Joined: Feb 19, 2008
Posts: 1,036

Jul 18, 2012 -- 10:20PM, iamajellydonut wrote:

Who the hell names "Beast" with Cavern of Souls?


Good Point. Have seen it though. If that's what you got in your hand at the moment and you want it to see play, there's a chance you call 'Beast' in the turn you play Tusk.
Other than that, yeah, no one.
My proposition was in line with the discussion. And heck. We don't know what's coming too

Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 19, 2012 - 1:01AM #47
MrIndigo
  • Mr. Indigo
Date Joined: Mar 27, 2003
Posts: 13,416

Jul 18, 2012 -- 6:42PM, javert wrote:

Oh please.

After getting stuck on several months of Delver we finally get out of that hole only for people to stat claiming somehow diversity doesn't count and the format is bad because they say so.

The only bomb cards in the format are Bonfire of the Damned and to a lesser extent Revenge of the Hunted. Sure, Miracle sucks and will probably going to end in the unplayable or unfun camp before it rotates, but it is certainly not Jace level ubiquitous. You can play something without them and expect to play against decks without them.

You can't possibly be that naive. Just because the next set has "Ravnica" in it it doesn't mean the format is going to magically flourish into dozens of different archetypes. First, we have to pray Ravnica doesn't get treated like Mirrodin so we will have "all the fun of Ravnica like Simic Sky Swaller 2.0 and super enhanced Autochton Wurm without none of the unfun evil cards like Mortify and Remand*". Even if that doesn't happen, you really need to explain how the new removal and permission is supposed to make control good instead of just making Delver be all over the place again.

My take is that the only way to accomplish it is to reinforce red and black without helping blue and white, so U / W Delver doesn't get benefits at all. That is very unlikely since black and red had been nerfed as of late for being the evil removal colors. Thus, it is impossible to have the "diversity" (asuming it doesn't actually mean x control or tempo winning all day long) you want without having cards banned. At best we will get a format like the current one, take it or leave it.

*Remand as a card that makes the format healthy is way overrated, but you get the point.




Diversity is definitely important, but the diversity in this format is somewhat illusory. Most decks play almost identical game plans, and the format can still be boring when it's balanced and/or diverse.

Delver won't be a thing post format when it loses Ponder (and Gitaxian Probe). It simply will not be a major deck. 

Nov 4, 2010 -- 9:11AM, Niche wrote:

Nov 3, 2010 -- 10:05PM, Razorgore wrote:

It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.



It should be about giving black cards to Niche.

Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 19, 2012 - 6:16AM #48
Wynzerman
Date Joined: Oct 23, 2010
Posts: 3,488

Jul 18, 2012 -- 6:42PM, javert wrote:

Oh please.

After getting stuck on several months of Delver we finally get out of that hole only for people to stat claiming somehow diversity doesn't count and the format is bad because they say so.
...
My take is that the only way to accomplish it is to reinforce red and black without helping blue and white, so U / W Delver doesn't get benefits at all.




That's a very asenine approach- because you know Zombies and GR Aggro didn't win tournaments during "delver dominance". As far as I recall, 2 weeks after Avacyn Restored was released, Gerry Thompson made the "Angel Delver" deck, tore down a tournament with it (because y'know it couldn't have had anything to with him being a decent Magic player), and suddenly the format was busted, diversity was lost and everything was gloom and doom. Frankly, the Seachrome Coast decks aren't oppressively good nor were they oppressively good post-Innistrad, but they share the same card frames (and a few card names) with CawBlade, and butts still be hurtin'.

Game design isn't about hosing competitive archetypes, it's about making an enjoyable product with exciting content. Development concerns itself with making cards reasonable for tournament play, but not for controlling what a future format looks like (as that is relatively impossible.)

I also don't see your supposed "diversity" being a huge thing in the new meta. Now Delver isn't the only deck that makes it difficult to play control or combo decks, and the number of viable decks (decks that can reasonably 2/3 games every round at a tournament) has shrunken.



Signature by
Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 19, 2012 - 9:37AM #49
Jman22
Date Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Posts: 2,787
Those of you who think Delver is already dead, you play with a bunch of terrible netdeckers who cannot think to build and/or modify a deck for themselves.

Delver/Snapcaster/Ponder/Gitaxian Probe/Mana Leak/Vapor Snag is still the best deck in the format.

And then add into the mix the fact that the majority of T1.5 decks get squashed into the ground by "Oh God I'm So Lucky Let Me Fireball Everything" and Thragtusk, the "Sure Hope Delver didn't side in Flashfreeze" .dec

I'm building Battle of Wits, and nobody can stop me. 
(at)MrEnglish22
"still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris"
-On the topic of Squire
Quick Reply
Cancel
11 months ago  ::  Jul 19, 2012 - 10:29AM #50
iamajellydonut
  • UnCon Prizewinner 2008
  • …mmm
Date Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Posts: 7,192
No matter where this thread goes, I'm still more afraid of Batterskull. I'm still more afraid of Gideon. I'm still more afraid of a whole host of other 5cc cards that exist in this format. 
lel♯ jenk♯ ∞ Show


I'm the world's leading astrophysicist. You can trust me, because I said I was.

Oct 11, 2012 -- 9:16AM, Enigma256 wrote:

Oct 11, 2012 -- 8:50AM, Chaikov wrote:

What's wrong with my formating?

you make paragraphs shorter than the page width


Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 5 of 20  •  Prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 ... 20 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing