Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Switch to Forum Live View Grafdigger's Cage against Genesis Wave
12 months ago  ::  Jun 23, 2012 - 10:24PM #1
Heihu
Date Joined: Jun 24, 2012
Posts: 1
Hi, I recently gotten into an argument with a friend over what does Grafdigger's Cage actually block or doesn't.

He claims that Grafdigger's Cage blocks every single permanent that Genesis Wave puts into play, but I maintained that apart from the creatures which are very clearly blocked, everything else can enter play.

The issue lies in whether "putting cards into play from the library or graveyard" is the same as "casting a spell from the library or graveyard".

Does Grafdigger's Cage completely stop Genesis Wave and similar cards like Warp World from putting non-creature permanents into play?

And on the same note, does Grafdigger's Cage stop you playing a land from the top of your library using Oracle of Mul Daya or Future Sight ?

Thank you.
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 23, 2012 - 10:28PM #2
Bowshewicz
Date Joined: Apr 12, 2012
Posts: 1,630
Casting a card is very different from putting it onto the battlefield, so Grafdigger's Cage won't completely stop Genesis Wave .

Oracle of Mul Daya works fine.

Future Sight can still get lands, but you'd have to cast anything else, and that's not allowed by the cage.
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 23, 2012 - 10:29PM #3
Segoth
Date Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Posts: 1,055
You are correct, spells like genesis wave and warp world simply put cards from the library onto the battlefield.  The cards in the library are not actually cast, so non-creature permanents can enter the battlefield this way.

Now as for the oracle of mul daya, you will have no problem playing lands from the library since they are not cast.  The same is also true for future sight, however future sight allows you to play lands or cast spells from the top of the library.   So while you can play lands, since grafdigger's cage states the spells can not be cast from the library other cards can not be cast that way using future sight.
DCI Level 2 Judge
Rockford, Illinois
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 23, 2012 - 10:30PM #4
rudolf
Date Joined: Sep 17, 2005
Posts: 16,209

Jun 23, 2012 -- 10:24PM, Heihu wrote:

Hi, I recently gotten into an argument with a friend over what does Grafdigger's Cage actually block or doesn't.

He claims that Grafdigger's Cage blocks every single permanent that Genesis Wave puts into play, but I maintained that apart from the creatures which are very clearly blocked, everything else can enter play.



You are correct.  The Cage does not stop non-creatures from entering the battlefield from the library.


The issue lies in whether "putting cards into play from the library or graveyard" is the same as "casting a spell from the library or graveyard".



No spells are being cast.  A spell cast from the library would be something like Panglacial Wurm 's ability.


Does Grafdigger's Cage completely stop Genesis Wave and similar cards like Warp World from putting non-creature permanents into play?



No


And on the same note, does Grafdigger's Cage stop you playing a land from the top of your library using Oracle of Mul Daya or Future Sight ?



No, except for odd cases like Dryad Arbor

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 24, 2012 - 12:20AM #5
ikegami
Date Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 2,231
"Put into play" doesn't exist anymore. It got renamed to "Put onto the battlefield" to highligh the fact that it has nothing to do with playing a card.

While the desired result of playing a permanent card is to put it onto the battlefield, they're not the same thing.
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 24, 2012 - 12:37AM #6
DocDoom
Date Joined: Aug 15, 2006
Posts: 2,021
The Cage blocks getting Creatures via Genesis the Wave, but nothing else. Only Creatures.
[c]Forest[/c] gives you Forest
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 24, 2012 - 2:42AM #7
LMTRK
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2009
Posts: 6,806

Jun 24, 2012 -- 12:20AM, ikegami wrote:

"Put into play" doesn't exist anymore. It got renamed to "Put onto the battlefield" to highligh the fact that it has nothing to do with playing a card.



Plus we dont even "play" creature spells anymore - we "cast" them.

~ Tim 

I am Blue/White
Reached DCI Rating 1800 on 28/10/11. :D
Sig Show

Jan 5, 2013 -- 9:32PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jan 4, 2013 -- 5:20AM, LMTRK wrote:

That makes no sense to me.

If they spelled the ability out on the card in full then it would not be allowed in a mono-black Commander deck, but because they used a keyword to save space it is allowed?

~ Tim   


Yup, just like you can have Birds of paradise in a mono green deck but not Noble Hierarch . YAY COLOR IDENTITY


Oct 26, 2012 -- 9:56PM, zammm wrote:

Oct 26, 2012 -- 12:24AM, Raeoran wrote:

Is algebra really that difficult?

Survey says yes.


Jul 7, 2011 -- 12:59AM, Novacat wrote:

Jul 7, 2011 -- 12:36AM, LMTRK wrote:

You want to make a milky drink. You squeeze a cow.


I love this description. Like the cows are sponges filled with milk. I can see it all Nick Parks claymation-style with the cow's eyes bugging out momentarily as a giant farmer squeezes it like a squeaky dog toy, and milk shoots out of it.

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 24, 2012 - 10:56AM #8
ikegami
Date Joined: Nov 16, 2007
Posts: 2,231

Jun 24, 2012 -- 2:42AM, LMTRK wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 12:20AM, ikegami wrote:

"Put into play" doesn't exist anymore. It got renamed to "Put onto the battlefield" to highligh the fact that it has nothing to do with playing a card.



Plus we dont even "play" creature spells anymore - we "cast" them.

~ Tim 


Yes and no. The "play a card" action still exists, and you can use it to cast a creature spell.

Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 24, 2012 - 10:59AM #9
LMTRK
Date Joined: Mar 22, 2009
Posts: 6,806

Jun 24, 2012 -- 10:56AM, ikegami wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 2:42AM, LMTRK wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 12:20AM, ikegami wrote:

"Put into play" doesn't exist anymore. It got renamed to "Put onto the battlefield" to highligh the fact that it has nothing to do with playing a card.



Plus we dont even "play" creature spells anymore - we "cast" them.

~ Tim 


The "play a card" instruction still exists, so I'm not sure what your point it.



"Play a card" is only used when there is a chance that the card could be a land instead of a spell.

My point was that tht have made 2 changes to the terminology to make things clearer, not just 1.

~ Tim 

I am Blue/White
Reached DCI Rating 1800 on 28/10/11. :D
Sig Show

Jan 5, 2013 -- 9:32PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jan 4, 2013 -- 5:20AM, LMTRK wrote:

That makes no sense to me.

If they spelled the ability out on the card in full then it would not be allowed in a mono-black Commander deck, but because they used a keyword to save space it is allowed?

~ Tim   


Yup, just like you can have Birds of paradise in a mono green deck but not Noble Hierarch . YAY COLOR IDENTITY


Oct 26, 2012 -- 9:56PM, zammm wrote:

Oct 26, 2012 -- 12:24AM, Raeoran wrote:

Is algebra really that difficult?

Survey says yes.


Jul 7, 2011 -- 12:59AM, Novacat wrote:

Jul 7, 2011 -- 12:36AM, LMTRK wrote:

You want to make a milky drink. You squeeze a cow.


I love this description. Like the cows are sponges filled with milk. I can see it all Nick Parks claymation-style with the cow's eyes bugging out momentarily as a giant farmer squeezes it like a squeaky dog toy, and milk shoots out of it.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing