Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 3 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 Next
Switch to Forum Live View 06/06/2012 BoaB: "I Ooze, You Lose"
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 4:00AM #21
alextfish
Date Joined: Mar 16, 2004
Posts: 1,466
Deck looks great, and it's good to see match reports again.

I'd have liked more details on "a Thornling against Jund is pretty much the most unfair thing ever". He just skimmed past what would have been a bit of fun reading. 
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 6:06AM #22
SamLL
Date Joined: Apr 30, 2003
Posts: 47
Using the best prices from bidwicket.com, assuming $5 shipping, free basic lands, and that Ravenous Baloth really means Obstinate Baloth:

Estimated total cost: 119.56
4 Llanowar Wastes: 4 @ 1.67; total 6.68
1 Pendelhaven: 1 @ 0.9; total 0.9
3 Treetop Village: 3 @ 0.76; total 2.28
4 Twilight Mire: 4 @ 9.25; total 37.0
4 Birds of Paradise: 4 @ 3.25; total 13.0
4 Devoted Druid: 4 @ 0.25; total 1.0
3 Elves of Deep Shadow: 3 @ 0.1; total 0.3
4 Fauna Shaman: 4 @ 2.23; total 8.92
1 Grim Poppet: 1 @ 0.45; total 0.45
1 Kitchen Finks: 1 @ 6.95; total 6.95
4 Llanowar Elves: 4 @ 0.02; total 0.08
4 Necrotic Ooze: 4 @ 0.49; total 1.96
1 Nekrataal: 1 @ 0.08; total 0.08
4 Quillspike: 4 @ 0.3; total 1.2
1 Shriekmaw: 1 @ 0.48; total 0.48
3 Thornling: 3 @ 1.7; total 5.1
4 Wall of Roots: 4 @ 0.2; total 0.8
3 Birthing Pod: 3 @ 2.35; total 7.05
4 Duress: 4 @ 0.07; total 0.28
3 Faerie Macabre: 3 @ 0.22; total 0.66
1 Hypnotic Specter: 1 @ 1.2; total 1.2
2 Krosan Grip: 2 @ 1.85; total 3.7
1 Melira, Sylvok Outcast: 1 @ 0.95; total 0.95
1 Obstinate Baloth: 1 @ 0.19; total 0.19
1 Thousand-Year Elixir: 1 @ 3.25; total 3.25
2 Viridian Shaman: 2 @ 0.05; total 0.1

Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 6:46AM #23
Maatn
Date Joined: Apr 16, 2007
Posts: 9
"A lot of readers have asked that I bring back game reports. I've played a lot of matches with this deck and I can share a couple of them here."


Great read, thans for the article!
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 2:01PM #24
Palfa88
Date Joined: Feb 24, 2011
Posts: 10
I gotta be honest is not that budget friendly but it seems good...... looking throught mtgo prices is much more than $120 thought 
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 2:07PM #25
Vlad74205
Date Joined: Dec 31, 2003
Posts: 360
These mistakes are really minor. As the one was already corrected, and the other is a typo.

The deck is a little pricey for me, though a huge chunk of that is in the lands. Swapping to basics doesn't look to make the deck too much harder to play smoothly. 

Interesting deck, and a fun way to abuse the Ooze.

I also liked how he skimmed useless parts in the game reports. I like the reports, but perfect detail isn't exactly needed. It basically showed that after that point, there wasn't much that mattered.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 8:06PM #26
Cybergan
Date Joined: Apr 8, 2007
Posts: 80
Have to say, this is far from a budget list. Wouldn't be an issue except the title of the column is "Building on a Budget". While, yes, it wouldn't be hard to swap out the Twilight Mires for basic lands, the mana-fixing of the dual lands should not be underestimated. Especially with the card that the deck is built around being a different color to about 85% of the rest of the deck. 

I remember when "Building on a Budget" actually had a limit of about 30 tickets on Magic: Online.  
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 9:24PM #27
Thalatta
Date Joined: Apr 16, 2011
Posts: 151
$120 seems pretty budget for Modern, though. The most expensive card in there is the Twilight Mire at not quite $10 each, and if we figure that the various singletons might already be part of a collection, or relatively easy to trade for...it seems pretty budget to me. Pod decks are quite nice that way, in fact.

Besides, about the only decent decks you can build for Standard with ~30 tickets are mono-green poison or goblins.
Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 06, 2012 - 9:47PM #28
MyMistake
Date Joined: Feb 21, 2012
Posts: 5
This is a cool deck and looks like a ton of fun to play. I have a cheapo Standard Birthing Pod deck that is fun when it works, and this deck looks like it would probably work better. Although... no 6-drop? There's nothing that lets you sac your Thornlings, which you really want in the graveyard. If you pull the Pod but not the Fauna Shaman, it's that much harder to fully assemble the combo. 
  I could see, in increasing cost:
  • .02 tix- Morselhoarder with an activated ability that really complements the deck
  • .03 tix- Gravetiller Wurm that comes in as an 8/8 trampler thanks to Morbid
  • .04 tix- Deadwood Treefolk that grabs something from the graveyard  as it enters and leaves the battlefield (just don't grab your combo pieces).

  So...

  I  checked the prices on CardHoarder and it looks like about $115 for this deck on MTGO. I thought that was pretty "budget" compared to most Modern decks, so I went to MTGO-Stats to see.
  The the first daily winner they have listed was a $415 Tarmogoyf deck, which made $115 look cheap. But then the next two were $130 and $110. Most cost more. I scanned past some $300 decks and then hit... $33.80? There are pauper decks that cost more than that. BOZ won a Modern Daily on June 3 with a $34 white-weenie deck list. The money card in the deck is a single Mikaeus the Lunarch, available on CardHoarder for a whopping 4 tix.
  Now, that's a budget Modern deck.

Still, JVL- cool article. Check the legality of the decklists. Keep bringing us good ideas and I like the game reports.


tldr: Cool deck, cheaper than most Modern event winners, still out of my price range.



Quick Reply
Cancel
13 months ago  ::  Jun 07, 2012 - 1:36AM #29
Amarsir
Date Joined: Oct 28, 2006
Posts: 2,722

With the new MTGO export feature, perhaps somewhere in the publishing process should come the routine of loading the deck in MTGO and checking legality.



I've thought for a while that this is probably the hardest column on the site to write, since JvL has to create decks that hold up in the meta without going to tier-1 cards, and then do it again the next week.  Maybe ReConstructed comes close now, but those deck requirements aren't as demanding and more importantly, I believe Gavin's a WotC employee while Jacob is an external contractor.  It's got to be an incredibly tough job.


But, that doesn't excuse mistakes week after week.  Pay him more so he can budget more time, or have the editors check more closely, or rotate the column to a new writer again, one who can give it focus.  Or maybe have two writers who alternate weeks, so each one only needs half as many ideas.  I just can't help shaking this recurring sense that, although Jacob is quite talented, these articles are incredibly rushed.


Free MTGO Tournaments you should be playing:
Pauper (all commons) - Tuesday Nights, prizes by MTGOTraders
Peasant (Pauper + 5 uncommons, with paper rarity) - Sunday Nights, prizes by MTGOTraders
Silverblack (Modern-era Commons and Uncommons - Most Wednesday nights, prizes by MTGO Bazaar
Heirloom ("Cheap" cards only, e.g. rares under 20 cents) - Sunday afternoons, sponsored by MTGOTraders
Check the superbly-made Gatherling site for more.

Other games you should try:
Spectromancer - Online card game by Richard Garfield, available cheap on Steam.
DC Universe Online - action-based MMO.  Free to play.  Surprised me how well designed it is.
Simunomics - Free-to-play economy simulation game.
Quick Reply
Cancel
12 months ago  ::  Jun 07, 2012 - 2:33PM #30
Negated
Date Joined: Jul 26, 2011
Posts: 61
And yet, if White Weenie showed up in a JVL article, everyone and their mother would be complaining that "this isn't what BoaB is supposed to be, you're supposed to showcase rogue decks, not cheap, established archetypes!"
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 3 of 4  •  Prev 1 2 3 4 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing