|
13 months ago ::
Jun 02, 2012 - 5:59PM
#11
|
Date Joined:
Jun 14, 2006
|
Lol traded Tibalt and Vexing Devil to scrubs, am okay with this. Though, in fairness, Vexing Devil is reasonably useful in Delver.
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 02, 2012 - 9:12PM
#12
|
Date Joined:
Jul 29, 2006
|
Eh im not mad about tibalt not having a home yet, he still has usfull abilitys that can be broken sooner or later. I got my playset at 40 bucks which isnt bad. I flat out refuse tho to pay more than 5 bucks per vexing devil. Even then I think five is charitable not "good". Devil is such a narrow use rare.
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 03, 2012 - 12:23AM
#13
|
Date Joined:
Mar 27, 2003
|
Lol traded Tibalt and Vexing Devil to scrubs, am okay with this. Though, in fairness, Vexing Devil is reasonably useful in Delver.
No, Vexing Devil is in fact totally awful in every deck you could conceivably use him in, up to and including Legacy Burn.
It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.
It should be about giving black cards to Niche.
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 03, 2012 - 3:15PM
#14
|
Date Joined:
Apr 23, 2012
|
Looking at the confirmed cards I am playing with the idea of turning RDW into RGW with a Fling+Serra Avatar Combo (red for burn and cards like faithless looting, green for extra mana and white for avatar etc. and possibly a hellrider+ token combo as well).
once you get the avatar out, had some early burn damage dealt to your opponent and fling in your hand, that pretty much means you would have won.
reckon a deck like that could work or would it be too slow and/or dependent on getting the right cards?
|
|
|
|
13 months ago ::
Jun 03, 2012 - 5:25PM
#15
|
Date Joined:
Apr 14, 2008
|
Looking at the confirmed cards I am playing with the idea of turning RDW into RGW with a Fling+Serra Avatar Combo (red for burn and cards like faithless looting, green for extra mana and white for avatar etc. and possibly a hellrider+ token combo as well).
once you get the avatar out, had some early burn damage dealt to your opponent and fling in your hand, that pretty much means you would have won.
reckon a deck like that could work or would it be too slow and/or dependent on getting the right cards?
It's bad. We're talking about a 9 mana 2-card combo. There's too many things that'd kill them faster, and too many less conditional ways to interact with their life total.
Playing an aggresive red deck, the whole advantage you have is that your removal is also reach once you're not able to get throug. Burn out their early creatures so your dudes can get through easily, burn their face off once that's out of the question. You're better off with a hard curve to 3/4, and some deviation from 22 creatures/18 burn or it's ilk. That way every topdeck can win the game, your curve isn't fighting itself and you're trying to run out of gas just in time.
Think about it, serra avatar and fling have both been around for ages. It's never been a thing except in fun little Johnny concept decks.
Luckily, we have stop-having-fun guys to remind us that having anything more than 60 cards in your deck is tantamount to being a rapist and anyone considering it should be strung up by their **** .
|
|
|
|
12 months ago ::
Jun 09, 2012 - 10:15PM
#16
|
Date Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
|
No, Vexing Devil is in fact totally awful in every deck you could conceivably use him in, up to and including Legacy Burn.
Eh, I dunno. Now I haven't tested this extensively vs. top tier decks, but my limited initial testing has seen some success using vexing devil in a RB list along with archwing dragon , zealous conscripts , Thunderous Wrath , and 2-ofs mimic vat and noxious revival .
T1 vexing devil is basically a flame javelin to the face. Now ordinarily this wouldn't be that great vs. the aggressive, board position centric decks that are rampant in standard. However, you add the ability to top deck a lava axe for 1 mana, and that early burn starts to look attractive. Add in the conscripts for mid-late game blowout potential, and the deck sort of runs. Mimic vat with conscripts is just dirty pool, as is a top-decked wrath backed up by noxious revival.
The black splash is basically just there for access to removal, to deal with threats that would just defeat a normal red deck.
I see how you can say that vexing devil is a creature when you need burn and burn when you need a creature, but I think you can build a deck that minimizes its weaknesses, particularly backed by the strength of red miracles.
|
|
|
|
12 months ago ::
Jun 11, 2012 - 7:36AM
#17
|
Date Joined:
Mar 12, 2006
|
No, Vexing Devil is in fact totally awful in every deck you could conceivably use him in, up to and including Legacy Burn.
Eh, I dunno. Now I haven't tested this extensively vs. top tier decks, but my limited initial testing has seen some success using vexing devil in a RB list along with archwing dragon , zealous conscripts , Thunderous Wrath , and 2-ofs mimic vat and noxious revival .
T1 vexing devil is basically a flame javelin to the face. Now ordinarily this wouldn't be that great vs. the aggressive, board position centric decks that are rampant in standard. However, you add the ability to top deck a lava axe for 1 mana, and that early burn starts to look attractive. Add in the conscripts for mid-late game blowout potential, and the deck sort of runs. Mimic vat with conscripts is just dirty pool, as is a top-decked wrath backed up by noxious revival.
The black splash is basically just there for access to removal, to deal with threats that would just defeat a normal red deck.
I see how you can say that vexing devil is a creature when you need burn and burn when you need a creature, but I think you can build a deck that minimizes its weaknesses, particularly backed by the strength of red miracles.
That sounds fine for game 1, but once your opponent knows what's up they'll just let you have the Devil then kill it, or Vapor Snag it, or block it. And Archwing Dragon is just not that great, considering Mana Leak, Vapor Snag, and Dismember are all seeing a decent amount of play (Oh, and Plummet). Mimic Vat is something that doesn't see near enough play however. But I think that's because it isn't as powerful as a sword, and it gets a lot of indirect hate due to people wanting to kill swords.
(at)MrEnglish22 "still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris" -On the topic of Squire
|
|
|
|
12 months ago ::
Jun 11, 2012 - 2:27PM
#18
|
Date Joined:
Jun 14, 2006
|
What advantage(s) does mono-Red offer over, say, B/r, R/b, G/r, etc?, aside from mana consistency? How are we to compete with U/x Delver et al with their retarded amount of card advantage?
|
|
|
|
12 months ago ::
Jun 12, 2012 - 2:57AM
#19
|
Date Joined:
Mar 27, 2003
|
What advantage(s) does mono-Red offer over, say, B/r, R/b, G/r, etc?, aside from mana consistency? How are we to compete with U/x Delver et al with their retarded amount of card advantage?
Shrine and Koth?
Delver doesn't win with card advantage, by the way; the only time they get CA is with Shrine and Snapcaster. They win with flexibility and adaptability.
It's really not even about giving niche cards to black.
It should be about giving black cards to Niche.
|
|
|
|
12 months ago ::
Jun 12, 2012 - 5:56AM
#20
|
Date Joined:
Mar 12, 2006
|
What advantage(s) does mono-Red offer over, say, B/r, R/b, G/r, etc?, aside from mana consistency? How are we to compete with U/x Delver et al with their retarded amount of card advantage?
Shrine and Koth?
Delver doesn't win with card advantage, by the way; the only time they get CA is with Shrine and Snapcaster. They win with flexibility and adaptability.
I think you had a mental slip-up, as I don't think Delver has Shrines of any kind.
As for running mono-red, I don't think Koth is all that great in this meta (maybe if red decks could afford to drop a PW turn 4 and not care about protecting it, but that deck would also be running Tibalt) and Shrine is only really good against Control, where you have plenty of time to tick it up anyway.
(at)MrEnglish22 "still a better Commander card than Emmara Tandris" -On the topic of Squire
|
|
|