Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 3  •  1 2 3 Next
Switch to Forum Live View Banana Rant: Non blue counterspells
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 10:40AM #1
mrbananas
Date Joined: Sep 18, 2007
Posts: 253
I feel that blue has too much of a monopoly on counter spells. Now here me out i am aware of the existence of older non blue counter spells and that countering is supposed to be blues color pie strength.  There about 23 non blue counter spells, most of them being really old and almost never reprinted, while there are about 148 blue ones, some of which often see reprinting.  Almost all design variations of a counter spell end up in blue.

         Take a look at direct damage for example.  It is primarily found in both Red and White.  Red has the much stronger unrestricted direct damage in the forms of shock , fireblast , and pyroclasm . Whites direct damage is usually restricted to only attacking and blocking creatures such as brigid, hero of kinsbaile , coordinated barrage , and catapult squad .  White direct damage appears often enough to keep Red from have a strict monopoly on the mechanic while at the same time the color pie still favors red more when it comes to direct damage thus making red the color to go to when you want to splash burn.

       With counter spells the primary division is between the "hard" counters like counterspell and the "soft" counters like mana leak . I personally feel that the soft counters should go to White. I love the flavor behind mana tithe . White is all about prohibiting unwanted actions through laws. When you make a law against littering the punishment is usually a fee/fine. The fine will discourage most from littering who don't want to pay it, but not all. Inside there are some people who care not for the law and would rather pay the fine for the convenience of not having to deal with there trash.  Thus these laws deter most, but not all.  With the soft counters, its like making a law saying this action is not allowed and if you continue to try to do it then your gonna have to pay a fine.  You could even take the flavor further and say that the law is enforced with magic that keeps you breaking it however if the user has a sufficient about of magic strength (in the form of extra mana) then they can overpower the magically enforced law.  Thus is why i think that flavor wise "soft" counters fit better in white and should be a staple of the white color pie. Blue would still be the king of counter spells with the hard counters just like how red is still considered the king of direct damage.

       One more thing i have to rant about and it is exiling spells. Exiling spells is a fairly rare mechanic that was given to blue in the form of mindbreak trap . I think this was a horrible missed opportunity to give it to another color (perhaps white which already solves most of its problems by exiling them).  If red and black are for the most part forbidden from having ways of stopping enchantments(without splashing or artifacts) like circle of protection: red , then blue should be just as forbidden from having solutions to uncounterable creatures and spells like kavu chameleon .  I recall some designers raising a fuss about liquimetal coating giving red an indirect way of smashing enchantments, yet no one seems to care when blue gets a direct way to defeat uncounterables like time stop or venser, shaper savant .
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 10:49AM #2
JustTerrorIt
Date Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Posts: 9,141
Maybe white should get a share of the counterspell action. I personally like Lapse of Certainty , though the general consensus was that it was "terrible". I got a few good uses out of it, but it's definitely no Mana Leak .

Mana Tithe is pretty awesome, too. But Dawn Charm , while versatile, is pretty weak countermagic.

But, if countering starts to bleed into white, there is going to be an outcry that White Gets Everything, even moreso than there is currently. 
Orzhova Witness

Restarting Quotes Block Show

May 29, 2012 -- 9:20AM, Mata_Hari wrote:

May 29, 2012 -- 9:13AM, febbstalicious42 wrote:

Disregard women acquire chase rares.

There are a lot of dudes for whom this is not optional.


Jun 9, 2012 -- 1:54PM, bay_falconer wrote:

Jun 7, 2012 -- 11:54AM, Bubasti wrote:

How;s a 2 drop 1/2, Flying broken? What am I missing?



You're missing it because *turns Storm Crows sideways* all your base are belong to Chuck Norris and every other overused meme ever.


Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 12:41PM #3
Beniwiwi
Date Joined: Jun 24, 2010
Posts: 604
Red ok, but white for direct damages ? How about black ? Pestilence , Corrupt , Drain Life , Urborg Stalker , Infernal Harvest , Kaervek's Hex , Vicious Hunger , Famine , Hasran Ogress  ... Still, black usually deals with life more than damages. Sure there has been D'avenant Archer & Icatian Javelineers before but that still wouldn't place white over black in that matter.

Mana Tithe is pretty interesting but a unusual card in white. Same for Sunlance .

White is about continuous & passive control while blue is about temporary & active control. 

Absolute Law , Absolute grace , Aura of Silence , Humility , Honor of the Pure , Stony Silence & Pacifism  are some examples of what white is all about, continuous and passive control.  You get them on the field and hope nobody breaks them before the end. For active and temporary control you have cards like  Disenchant & Swords to Plowshares . Blue can't deal with permanents that way. Each color has its specific mechanics, why not keep it that way ?

Personally I like Darkness but it's a pretty unusual card in black. So maybe they should also consider adding damage prevention in black?

Blue can exile spells, white can exile permanents:  Swords to Plowshares Return to Dust . Maybe blue should be able to exile permanents too now, don't you think ? It would be fair for both colors.

To each color its specificities and that's how the game is fun.



   


Lapse of Certainty ... *cough, cough Memory Lapse , cough*


    

   


   

 

My decks, mostly casuals, but some I use online with some small changes:

http://www.mtgvault.com/Profile.aspx?UserID=91484
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 1:58PM #4
GoTexans
Date Joined: Aug 22, 2004
Posts: 8,006
The only reason I disagree with giving white counterspells is white already gets everything. White has exiling, mass removal, artifact/enchantment hate, efficient creatures, the best flyers, and multipurpose removal. White counterspelling makes sense in regards to flavor. I would have to say if white got counterspelling it would have to lose something big.

In all seriousness I think green or black should get the minor counterspelling. Balance wise I think it makes sense in green. Then again it could work ok with the flavor of green.

Something like this:

Counter Progress

Counter target artifact or enchantment spell.
Draw a card. 

Delayed Arrival 

Counter target creature or artifact spell. Put that card on top of its owner's library.
 
True post count: 9,900
Thanks Wotc for not counting archived posts.
If I post without capital letters than means I'm posting from my phone. For some reason it hates typing capital letters.
Go_Texans on MTGO.

Texans 12-4
Wildcard: W Texans 19 Bengals 13
Divisional: L Texans 28 Patriots 41
Another awesome season!
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 2:26PM #5
RPJesus
Date Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 15,146

May 8, 2012 -- 1:58PM, GoTexans wrote:

The only reason I disagree with giving white counterspells is white already gets everything. 
...
In all seriousness I think green should get the minor counterspelling. 



I'm noticing some incongr uities in your logic there :33.

Honestly I'd like to see em in black with more dash hopes effects. Quality aside, it's a cool card, and fits black's flavor. They could even do variants like "counter unless they sac a creature," and what have you.

Zammm = Batman.
Bronies unite.
"I'd call you a genius, but I'm in the room."
It's my sig in a box Show

Jul 29, 2012 -- 9:56PM, ChaosLight wrote:


Everything is better when you read it in Bane's voice.


Oct 18, 2012 -- 11:06AM, SteelWall wrote:

Your human antics and desire to continue living have moved me. Just kidding. You cannot move me physically or emotionally. Wall humor.


Oct 26, 2012 -- 8:17AM, Chaikov wrote:

Copy effects work like a photocopy machine: you get a copy of the 'naked' card, NOT of what's on it.



Dec 3, 2012 -- 10:18PM, Splattercat wrote:


Funny story:
InQuest Magazine (I think it was InQuest) had an oversized Chaos Orb which I totally rooked someone into allowing into a (non-sanctioned) game. 
I had a proxy card that was a Mountain with "Chaos Orb" written on it. When I played it, my opponent cried foul:

Him: "WTF? a Proxy? no-one said anything about Proxies. Do you even own an actual Chaos Orb?"
Me: "Yes, but I thought it would be better to use a Proxy." 
Him: "No way. If you're going to put a Chaos Orb in your deck you have to use your actual Chaos Orb."
Me: "*Sigh*. Okay."

I pulled out this huge Chaos Orb and placed it on the table. He tried to cry foul again but everyone else said he insisted I use my actual Chaos Orb and that was my actual Chaos Orb. I used it, flipped it and wiped most of his board.

Unsurprisingly, that only worked once and only because everyone present thought it was hilarious.


My DM on Battleminds:

no, see i can kill defenders, but 8 consecutive crits on a battlemind, eh walk it off.





Jan 15, 2013 -- 5:28PM, Iam_IronMan wrote:


Jan 15, 2013 -- 5:20PM, Jerrymm91 wrote:

Hi guys!  So, I'm a sort of returning player to Magic.  I say sort of because as a child I had two main TCG's I liked.  Yu-Gi-Oh, and Pokemon.  Some of my friends branched off in to Magic, and I bought two pre-made decks just to kind of fit in.  Like I said, Yu-Gi-Oh and Pokemon were what I really knew how to play.  I have a extensive knowledge of deck building in those two TCG's.  However, as far as Magic is concerned, I only ever used those two pre made decks.  I know how the game is played, and I know general things, but now I want to get in the game for real.  I want to begin playing it as a regular.  My question is, are all cards ever released from the time of the inception of this game until present day fair game in a deck?  Or are there special rules?  Are some cards forbidden or restricted?  Thanks guys, and I will gladly accept ANY help lol. 


I have the same problem with women.




Is this my new ego sig? Yes it is, other Barry Show


Jan 7, 2012 -- 6:59PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

And that's why you should never, ever call RP Jesus on being a troll, because then everyone else playing along gets outed, too, and the thread goes back to being boring.



Dec 2, 2012 -- 1:39PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

See, this is why RPJesus should be in charge of the storyline. The novel line would never have been cancelled if he had been running the show. Specifically the Slobad and Geth's Head talkshow he just described.



Dec 17, 2012 -- 4:27PM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

Not only was that an obligatory joke, it was an on-topic post that still managed to be off-topic due to thread derailment. RP Jesus does it again folks.




Feb 8, 2012 -- 4:40AM, ArtVenn wrote:

I think I'm gonna' start praying to Jesus... That's right, RPJesus, I'm gonna' be praying to you, right now.

O' Jesus

Please continue to make my time here on the forums fun and cause me to chuckle.

Amen.


Feb 17, 2011 -- 3:08AM, ArtVenn wrote:

Feb 16, 2011 -- 6:43PM, RPJesus wrote:

It was wonderful. Us Johnnies had a field day. That Timmy with the Grizzly bears would actually have to think  about swinging into your Mogg Fanatic , giving you time to set up your silly combo . Nowadays it's all DERPSWING! with thier blue jeans and their MP3 players and their EM EM OH AR PEE JEES and their "Dewmocracy" and their children's card games and their Jersey Shores and their Tattooed Tenaged Vampire Hunters from Beverly Hills


Seriously, that was amazing.  I laughed my *ss off.  Made my day, and I just woke up.


ArtVenn
You're still one of my favorite people... just sayin'.




Jan 11, 2012 -- 7:19AM, Salla wrote:

Jan 11, 2012 -- 4:37AM, Ogiwan wrote:


.....would it be a bit blasphemous if I said, "PRAYSE RPJAYSUS!" like an Evangelical preacher?



Perhaps, but who doesn't like to blaspheme every now and again?

Especially when Mr. RPJesus is completely right.


May 16, 2011 -- 12:18PM, Salla wrote:

I don't say this often, but ...

LOL



May 10, 2010 -- 7:37AM, AivaRuin wrote:



You... You... Evil something... I actualy made the damn char once I saw the poster...

Now you made me see it again and I gained resolve to put it into my campaign. Shell be high standing oficial of Cyrix order. Uterly mad and only slightly evil.

And it'll be bad. Evil even. And ill blame you and Lizard for it :P.



Jun 29, 2011 -- 11:05AM, Lineov wrote:

Jun 28, 2011 -- 2:44PM, Litmus wrote:



I'm trying to work out if you're being sarcastic here.  ...



Am going to stop you right there... it's RPJesus... he's always sarcastic


Jan 16, 2012 -- 11:37PM, febbstalicious42 wrote:

Jan 16, 2012 -- 11:35PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jan 16, 2012 -- 9:58PM, HeartlessNobody wrote:

we can only hope it gets the jace treatment...it could have at least been legendary


So that even the decks that don't run it run it to deal with it? Isn't that like the definition of format warping?


I lol'd.


Oct 26, 2011 -- 11:40PM, zammm wrote:

Oct 26, 2011 -- 7:43PM, TyGuy42 wrote:

Uktabi Orangutan What the heck's going on with those monkeys?

The most common answer is that they are what RPJesus would call "[Debutantes avert your eyes]ing."



Feb 9, 2012 -- 8:41AM, Dilleux_Lepaire wrote:

Spoiler: Show

Feb 9, 2012 -- 7:45AM, KeeperofManyNames wrote:

Feb 9, 2012 -- 5:49AM, ORC_Ragnar wrote:

I’ve removed content from this thread because off-topic discussions are a violation of the Code of Conduct.

You can review the Code here: www.wizards.com/Company/About.aspx?x=wz_...

Please keep your posts polite, on-topic, and refrain from making personal attacks. You are welcome to disagree with one another but please do so respectfully and constructively.

If you wish to report a post for Code of Conduct violation, click on the “Report Post” button above the post and this will submit your report to the moderators on duty.

...Am I the only one that thinks this is reaching the point of downright Kafkaesque insanity?



I condone the use of the word Kafkaesque. However, I'm presentely ambivalent. I mean, that can't be serious, right? We're April 1st, right? They didn't mod RPJesus for off-topic discussion when the WHOLE THREAD IS OFF-TOPIC, right?

Right.



Mar 9, 2012 -- 3:32PM, Garthanos wrote:

Mar 7, 2012 -- 4:54PM, RPJesus wrote:


Save or die. If you disagree with this, you're wrong (Not because of any points or arguements that have been made, but I just rolled a d20 for you and got a 1, so you lose).



Mar 19, 2012 -- 5:07PM, Kalnaur wrote:

Mar 19, 2012 -- 4:41PM, DoctorBadWolf wrote:


This just won the argument, AFAIC.



That's just awesome.



May 12, 2010 -- 9:36AM, JustTerrorIt wrote:

May 11, 2010 -- 5:46PM, Master_Yumyums wrote:

HOW DID I NOT KNOW ABOUT THE BEAR PRODUCING WORDS OF WILDING?!  WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME?!



That's what RPJesus tends to do. That's why I don't think he's a real person, but some Magic Card Archive Server sort of machine, that is programmed to react to other posters' comments with obscure cards that do in fact exist, but somehow missed by even the most experienced Magic players.

And then come up with strange combos with said cards. All of that is impossible for a normal human to do given the amount of time he does it and how often he does it.

He/It got me with Light of Sanction , which prompted me to go to RQ&A to try and find if it was even possible to do combat damage to a creature I control (in light that Mark of Asylum exists).



Dec 16, 2011 -- 10:16AM, HairlessThoctar wrote:


+10



Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:23PM, Eonblueapocalypse1 wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:13PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jun 24, 2012 -- 8:02PM, tehbeast wrote:

heaven or hell.


Round 1. Lets rock.



GG quotes!

RPJesus just made this thread win!



Jul 25, 2012 -- 12:06AM, WhiteRaven810 wrote:

Jul 23, 2012 -- 6:26PM, RPJesus wrote:

Jul 23, 2012 -- 5:47PM, felisdomesticus wrote:


Blue players get all the overpowerered cards like JTMS.  I think it's time that wizards gave something to people who remember what magic is really about:  creatures.


Initially yes, Wizards was married to blue. However, about a decade ago they had a nasty divorce, and a few years after that they began courting the attention of Green. Then in Worldwake they had a nasty affair with their ex, but as of Innistrad , things seem to have gotten back on track, and Wizards has even proposed .



You are my favorite. Yes you. And moments like this make it so. Thank you RPJesus for just being you.



On what flavor text fits me:

Nov 15, 2012 -- 12:55AM, CadaverousBl00m wrote:

Surely RPJesus gets Niv-Mizzet, Dracogenius ?



Sep 15, 2012 -- 4:24PM, Dragon_Nut wrote:


First: I STILL can't take you seriously with that avatar. And I can take RPJesus seriously, so that's saying something.



Sep 17, 2012 -- 1:31PM, Banderbear wrote:


I'd offer you a cookie for making me laugh but it has an Upkeep Cost that has been known to cause people to quit eating.



Jan 2, 2013 -- 7:46AM, royk wrote:



I you loads



Jan 20, 2013 -- 10:27PM, TV_Casualty wrote:

Jan 20, 2013 -- 10:17PM, RPJesus wrote:

"AINT NO LAWS IN THE SKY MOTHER****." - Agrus Kos, Wojek Veteran


10/10. Amazing.



Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 2:39PM #6
StoicChampion
Date Joined: Jul 11, 2010
Posts: 1,331
What they should do is give every color everything, homogenize the crap out of their game, then take all the money they've earned on the current game and go to the Bahamas and drink Mojitos on the beach.

Haha.......[Insert your choice of meh, bah, ugh, and/or sigh Here].
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 4:32PM #7
JustTerrorIt
Date Joined: Dec 16, 2008
Posts: 9,141

May 8, 2012 -- 10:49AM, JustTerrorIt wrote:

But, if countering starts to bleed into white, there is going to be an outcry that White Gets Everything, even moreso than there is currently. 




May 8, 2012 -- 1:58PM, GoTexans wrote:

The only reason I disagree with giving white counterspells is white already gets everything.



See? Now imagine if M13 unveils a 2 mana Lapse of Certainty , or a Mana Tithe variant except the controller of the spell has to pay .

There will be wars in the streets. 

Orzhova Witness

Restarting Quotes Block Show

May 29, 2012 -- 9:20AM, Mata_Hari wrote:

May 29, 2012 -- 9:13AM, febbstalicious42 wrote:

Disregard women acquire chase rares.

There are a lot of dudes for whom this is not optional.


Jun 9, 2012 -- 1:54PM, bay_falconer wrote:

Jun 7, 2012 -- 11:54AM, Bubasti wrote:

How;s a 2 drop 1/2, Flying broken? What am I missing?



You're missing it because *turns Storm Crows sideways* all your base are belong to Chuck Norris and every other overused meme ever.


Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 4:46PM #8
skeindubh
Date Joined: Dec 12, 2007
Posts: 2,450
I still want to see the red stifle effects.

banefire   
instant

exile target creature or artifact and Counter any activated or triggered abilities on the stack from that target.

You are Red/Blue!
You are Red/Blue!
Take The Magic Dual Colour Test - Beta today!
Created with Rum and Monkey's Personality Test Generator.

You are both rational and emotional. You value creation and discovery, and feel strongly about what I create. At best, you're innovative and intuitive. At worst, you're scattered and unpredictable.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 5:01PM #9
NeoMint
Date Joined: Aug 25, 2010
Posts: 1,153
Part of the fun of the game is being able to take account of the flow of each colour. Green counterspells would break the pattern too much. It'd be like black being able to deal with enchantments. It would alter, in a negative way, the character of each colour.

Also, **** Mindbreak Trap.  
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 08, 2012 - 5:27PM #10
MoiMoi
Date Joined: Sep 22, 2008
Posts: 949
White's arsenal for board removal/control is already potent enough, you want to give it pre-board removal? Are you kidding me?

Black is much more well equipped than white when it comes to direct damage.

The only thing that's implied and about right in your post is that blue is too powerful, I agree with this one, half my decks use blue as one of their colors. It's the most splashable color because it's the one with the most versability (that's an opinion, but I think it's a shared opinion, proof : the cost of blue/color dual lands VS the cost of non-blue dual lands)
I love trolls

Dont hate me because I'm blunt and you cannot handle it
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  1 2 3 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing