Community

 
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 2 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3 Next
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:08PM #11
geckopia
Date Joined: Mar 5, 2011
Posts: 513
so it doesn't "tap" the creature if it's no been marked with lethal damange... does the order matter? regen before vs. after a doom blade for example?
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:11PM #12
Enigma256
Date Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Posts: 14,028
you can only regenerate before it is destroyed
afterwards it is already in the graveyard

the last time you can use regeneration before it is too late is in response to the Doom Blade
proud member of the 2011 community team
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:12PM #13
Natedogg
  • Niftily helpful
  • DCI Level 2 Judge
Date Joined: Mar 16, 2001
Posts: 3,932
Setting up a regeneration shield does nothing to the creature. Only when that shield is used will any of the other effects (like tapping the creature or removing it from combat) happen. And in order to save the creature, you must regenerate it before it's destroyed. You cannot regenerate something that's in the graveyard.
Wizards.Com Boards Net Rep
DCI Level 2 Judge

Questions don't have to make sense, but answers do.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:16PM #14
jeff-heikkinen
  • ****(ytic)
Date Joined: Aug 13, 2001
Posts: 8,385
Once again, regeneration is a replacement effect. Specifically, it replaces the event of the relevant creature being destroyed. Playing a regeneration effect doesn't do anything right away. Instead it creates an effect, which a lot of people refer to as a "shield", that says "the next time this guy would be destroyed, instead do the following (or as much of it as applies): tap it, remove it from combat, and remove all damage from it". Absolutely nothing happens until the part in itallics actually applies, then it does its thing.

Notice, too, that this has absolutely nothing to do with rescuing anything from the graveyard; it keeps things from ever going there in the first place. I don't know if you (gecko) thought it did, but plenty of people do. 
Jeff Heikkinen
DCI Rules Advisor since Dec 25, 2011
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:20PM #15
geckopia
Date Joined: Mar 5, 2011
Posts: 513

May 6, 2012 -- 8:12PM, Natedogg wrote:

Setting up a regeneration shield does nothing to the creature. Only when that shield is used will any of the other effects (like tapping the creature or removing it from combat) happen. And in order to save the creature, you must regenerate it before it's destroyed. You cannot regenerate something that's in the graveyard.



I know you can't regenerate it once it leave the battlefield.

So, what is the outcome?

They use regenerate spell on my creature that is attacking.

Does it remain in combat, tapped and attacking, so the spell does nothing?

If the creature later took lethal damage or is doom bladed, does the regenerate spell have any effect still?

the situation is there are some folks I know that believe they can use "regenerate" ability to tap an opponents creature...

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:23PM #16
Enigma256
Date Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Posts: 14,028
the shield holds till the end of turn
so if in that time the creature gets lethal damage or some other destroy effect it will be regenerated. if not the shield will just fade in the cleanup step
proud member of the 2011 community team
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:31PM #17
geckopia
Date Joined: Mar 5, 2011
Posts: 513

May 6, 2012 -- 8:23PM, Enigma256 wrote:

the shield holds till the end of turn
so if in that time the creature gets lethal damage or some other destroy effect it will be regenerated. if not the shield will just fade in the cleanup step




I guess I need to try to ask my question another way.

There are people here that say that because regenerate rules state that a creature is removed from combat, they can simply use their regenerate ability on an attacking creature to remove it from combat. Nothing about damage involved. simply as a mechanic to remove an attacking creature from combat.

(The next time that creature would be destroyed this turn, it isn't. Instead tap it, remove all damage from it, and remove it from combat.)

They can't do that because the regenerate doesn tap anything UNLESS the creature risks destruction first, correct?

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 8:36PM #18
Enigma256
Date Joined: Jul 28, 2010
Posts: 14,028
yes, correct, they are wrong
proud member of the 2011 community team
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 10:25PM #19
Chaikov
Date Joined: Jun 21, 2006
Posts: 5,988

May 6, 2012 -- 8:20PM, geckopia wrote:

Does it remain in combat, tapped and attacking, so the spell does nothing?


Yes.


«Dystocracy : A system of government in which corrupt leadership colludes with dishonest bankers and greedy elites in order to ensure that productive members of society –people who actually do useful work- bear the greatest share of taxes while gaining the least benefit possible.»

Sounds familiar?
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  May 06, 2012 - 10:32PM #20
Chaikov
Date Joined: Jun 21, 2006
Posts: 5,988

May 6, 2012 -- 8:16PM, jeff-heikkinen wrote:

[Regeneration] creates an effect, which a lot of people refer to as a "shield"...


There might be a reason for that...

701.12a (...) “Regenerate [permanent]” means
“The next time [permanent] would be destroyed this turn,
instead
remove all damage marked on it
and tap it
and
if it’s an attacking or blocking creature,
remove it from combat.”


701.12c Neither activating an ability that creates a regeneration shield
nor casting a spell that creates a regeneration shield
is the same as regenerating a permanent...






Take good note of rule 701.12c:
Activating a regeneration shield
is not the same as
actually regenerating a permanent.     


  

«Dystocracy : A system of government in which corrupt leadership colludes with dishonest bankers and greedy elites in order to ensure that productive members of society –people who actually do useful work- bear the greatest share of taxes while gaining the least benefit possible.»

Sounds familiar?
Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Prev 1 2 3 Next
Jump Menu:
 
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing