|
1 year ago ::
May 01, 2012 - 2:05PM
#11
|
Date Joined:
Nov 12, 2008
|
I would put it like that because as much as you want to attack him, you shouldn't...yet. If he is new to running tourneys, being attacked may make him feel like the hassle just isnt worth it and not run anymore, when the problem could be as simple as "he just didnt know" or think there was a way to cheat or that the little things he did could make such a big impact.
I have no intention of "attacking" him. I am trying to mediate between him and the upset players. I do feel it may be necessary to caution him about allowing some players unfair advantages, and I definitely feel it necessary to explain to him what "Sealed Deck" means! lol If the upset players want to file a formal complaint, I don't see how that is an "attack" unless it is very poorly worded.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
May 01, 2012 - 3:22PM
#12
|
Date Joined:
Jun 21, 2006
|
If the upset players want to file a formal complaint, I don't see how that is an "attack" unless it is very poorly worded.
Any «attack» you may seem to perform is actually an act of self-defense.
Alas! So many people have the nasty habit of confounding the attacker with the attackee!
Attackers oftentimes do their deeds under the cover of darkness: they pass by unnoticed. Smiling even.
The attackee is «crying wolf», trying to expose the unacceptable behavior of the attacker. Not smilng at all.
(Dumb) people shoot at the noisiest target. ( «because they are making trouble; because they are making a fuss» )
That explains why so many crimes go unpunished: victims are incited, by peer pressure, to shut their mouths.
«Dystocracy : A system of government in which corrupt leadership colludes with dishonest bankers and greedy elites in order to ensure that productive members of society –people who actually do useful work- bear the greatest share of taxes while gaining the least benefit possible.»
Sounds familiar?
|
|
|
