|
1 year ago ::
Apr 30, 2012 - 8:56AM
#1
|
|
|
This weeks vs is between... Seal of Fire  vs. Shock  Both of these cards have there advantages. The seal can come down whenever and be used when you need it. However Shock has the surprise factor going for it. Personally, I kind of like the surprise. Discuss!
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Apr 30, 2012 - 9:07AM
#2
|
Date Joined:
Jul 23, 2003
|
Shock is better in more decks. But, somewhere out there is the crazy SOB that's running Seal with Opalescence  and something that will give a creature Deathtouch.
Scope my YouTube channel!The U.S. Army: The best job in the world, working with some of the best people in the world, for one of the worst employers you could ever imagine. Here's a shout out for Scholars' Books & Games in Bridgewater, MA, and for Paladin's Place in Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany where I was stationed for two years. Support your FLGS! | Attacking the darkness since 1987, turning creatures sideways since 1994. | Billy Goat Gruff in the House of Trolls. |
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Apr 30, 2012 - 10:52AM
#3
|
|
|
Seal of Fire for me.
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Apr 30, 2012 - 11:53AM
#4
|
Date Joined:
Nov 26, 2009
|
Seal of Fire is cool cause its there just taunting you, like "Attack me I dare ya!" but it can't beat the surprise nature of shock
|
|
|
|
1 year ago ::
Apr 30, 2012 - 8:37PM
#5
|
Date Joined:
Nov 27, 2011
|
Ravnica was definitely the right block to put the Seal of Fire. Hellbent is one of very few things that could pass for a reason to run Seal over Shock.
|
|
|
