Community

 
Magic: The Gathering Daily MtG Article .. 04/26/2012 FtL: "Infinite Reflection: The Mailbag"
Jump Menu:
Post Reply
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Switch to Forum Live View 04/26/2012 FtL: "Infinite Reflection: The Mailbag"
1 year ago  ::  Apr 25, 2012 - 4:10PM #1
Garmichael
Date Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 1,572
This thread is for discussion of this week's From the Lab article, which goes live Thursday morning on magicthegathering.com.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 25, 2012 - 9:15PM #2
coien
Date Joined: May 24, 2011
Posts: 145
Am I missing something or does that Arcanum Wings combo not work quite the way the article says? You have to Donate the Reflection instead of the Sages, because the "you" on the Reflection refers to ITS owner, not the owner of the creature it's on.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 12:15AM #3
Ratosai
Date Joined: Oct 2, 2011
Posts: 1
You're not missing a thing. It wouldn't work since you control the enchantment, which would make your creatures copies of Sages. What a backfire...

Unless, of course, your plan is to draw a boatload of creatures. 
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 2:36AM #4
EternalLurker
Date Joined: Jan 22, 2010
Posts: 24
Why is it that van Lunen makes a mistake and everyone is foaming-at-the-mouth mad, but a mistake this blatant here (why on earth would swapping the enchantment in via Arcanum Wings make its controller any different than hardcasting it?) is met with shrugs?
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 5:01AM #5
Highwayman
Date Joined: Feb 3, 2004
Posts: 3,079
You know what lept off the page to me?

4 x Cavern of Souls

This is in a casual deck with 20 creatures but no unifying creature types (there are two walls, the rest are all unique). However this card is so stupidly good that it is probably a good call. It probably isn't even in there to battle counter magic so much as a three-color land that doesn't enter the battlefield tapped.
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 10:59AM #6
Tap4Mana
Date Joined: Sep 21, 2010
Posts: 606
If I were to take his Zombie deck and run with it, I would add one thing, which most of the Zombie decks I've seen played in Standard already make use of: Mortarpod. It's a sac outlet for the Captains so that you don't need to wait around for the "another zombie you control dies" ability to activate. That way you can also break through against creature heavy decks that can clog the board and block till the Angels come home. Too bad the Germ Token wouldn't turn into a Captain when it hits though.
~ Current Decks I'm Playing or Building ~
(Click a deck's name to see list)
[] CorpseJunk Menace/Township Counters (Standard)
[] Reanimation/Clerics Theme Deck - Commander: Ghost Dad
[] Devouring Tokens (Planechase, Multiplayer)
[Krark-Clan Ironworks: 2012 Edition (Modern)
[] Azorious Turbo Fog (Modern)


   
   
   
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 1:16PM #7
GreenBuster
Date Joined: Oct 7, 2008
Posts: 875

Apr 26, 2012 -- 5:01AM, Highwayman wrote:

You know what lept off the page to me?

4 x Cavern of Souls

This is in a casual deck with 20 creatures but no unifying creature types (there are two walls, the rest are all unique). However this card is so stupidly good that it is probably a good call. It probably isn't even in there to battle counter magic so much as a three-color land that doesn't enter the battlefield tapped.




If you are talking about the "Reflected Research" deck, it will only add colored mana if you name one of the creature types and you can only use the mana for creatures of that type.  What it is for most likely is to allow Reflecting Pool to add any color since Cavern of Souls "could" add any color.

Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 2:26PM #8
Flyheight
Date Joined: Jan 19, 2010
Posts: 1,122
Darth Parallax, wherever you are, my hat goes off to you good sir.  You and your 625/625 S.N.O.T. (that's 25 squared if you didn't already know).
********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
From Mark Rosewater's Tumblr:

the0uroboros asked: How in the same set can we have a hexproof, unsacrificable(not a word) creature AND a land that makes it uncounterable. How does this lead to interactive play?

I believe I’m able to play my creature and you have to deal with it is much more interactive than you counter my creature.
********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Post #777
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 2:54PM #9
Tap4Mana
Date Joined: Sep 21, 2010
Posts: 606
here's a fun idea: a soldier deck with Preeminent Captain . With the reflection out, you get free soldiers from your hand where they instantly become whatever is being reflected.  Furthermore, an Ally deck would be bonkers with the reflection... so how about we put Preeminant Captain, Makindi Shieldmate and the Reflection in a deck and mush em all together? Does anyone know what would happen if you enchanted a creature that is paired with another creature through soulbond? More specifically, does the Reflection copy the "paired" condition of the original creature?
~ Current Decks I'm Playing or Building ~
(Click a deck's name to see list)
[] CorpseJunk Menace/Township Counters (Standard)
[] Reanimation/Clerics Theme Deck - Commander: Ghost Dad
[] Devouring Tokens (Planechase, Multiplayer)
[Krark-Clan Ironworks: 2012 Edition (Modern)
[] Azorious Turbo Fog (Modern)


   
   
   
Quick Reply
Cancel
1 year ago  ::  Apr 26, 2012 - 3:27PM #10
chronego
Date Joined: Jul 6, 2011
Posts: 1,281

Apr 26, 2012 -- 2:36AM, EternalLurker wrote:

Why is it that van Lunen makes a mistake and everyone is foaming-at-the-mouth mad, but a mistake this blatant here (why on earth would swapping the enchantment in via Arcanum Wings make its controller any different than hardcasting it?) is met with shrugs?


Two reasons:

1. This article is all about crazy combos, so occasional misfires are to be expected. Furthermore, it wasn't the author but the person who sent him the e-mail that made the mistake.

2. JVL made a mistake, in a column about building a deck for a specific format, of including a card banned in that format. This is a severe mistake, as it disqualifies the entire deck from competing. It also implied that he either lies about his playtest matches, or was playtesting very casually which flies in the face of his "competitive first, budget rarely" policy. Making a mistake about a single combo in a column loaded with over a dozen combos every week is much more forgivable.

Quick Reply
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  1 2 Next
Jump Menu:
 
Magic: The Gathering Daily MtG Article .. 04/26/2012 FtL: "Infinite Reflection: The Mailbag"
    Viewing this thread :: 0 registered and 1 guest
    No registered users viewing