I swapped all 8 lands in my Chimney Imp deck to Zendikar full land art B and won a game 1 vs 7. It is clearly the strongest land available, I feel the deck could have done better if I were to only run 3 imps though.
How often do the 8-land decks win? In Texas Hold'em the worst pocket cards are 7-2 offsuit because they aren't paired, unsuited, there is no possible way to make a straight with both of them and they are both worthless as kickers. As almost everyone knows, the best possible pre-flop hand is AA. However, even 7-2os will win over AA about 12% of the time in simulations not so much because it won, but that AA "lost".
Is it possible that the 8-land victories are purely luck of the draw and not statistically important?
10-land stompy was a serious deck back in the day, and it's even been making a resurgence in Pauper lately with the printing of Young Wolf and Hunger of the Howlpack . However, a simulation that simply runs 1/1 creatures against 2/2 creatures is too simplistic to give us in-depth information on real Magic. It would be interesting, though, to learn that your simulation found a tetramodal distribution rather than a simple modal distribution for the number of lands you "evolved".
To all questioners, there's only two questions asked that are not answered by the article itself, so I strongly suggests that you re-read it but with more thoroughness
The two questions not answered by the post are:
A: Where's the math in it? I'ts evolution, and nature has proven time and time again that it follows the inherant structures of the world, including core mathematics. Theres your math!
B: How does the simulation work? I'm quite willing to share the program itself, but there are some technical problems. 1. My computer is broken down (Not an unsolvable problem) 2. I write my programs in c64 basic and used a c64 emulator on a pc. The specific emulator I use is no longer available on the net in a version that can save/store programs. At least it wasn't when I tried to introduce the program to phyrexia.com so it will take someone to find a working emulator with an undammaged save function, and me posting an alternate version of the program itself then the one with the emulator writes and saves, then run the program, and after some modifications he/she will be able to do exactly the same as I did. It took me a couple of days to build the program and some weeks to find all bugs. (Except some few, very difficult ones that may wait around for a long time before they show up on any tests!)
The program follows these steps:
1: Generate a population. all decks in the deckmemory will start out as a copy of a single manasolution. Then they will all be randomly mutated.
2: The program starts a cycle. One deck is chosen by it's decknumber (In this case deck nr 1.) and another is chosen at random. the two decks compete by the program measuring how fast they kill a goldfishplayer on the average of the number of played games. The deck that has the worst results are overwritten by the winning deck and mutated. Then the process is repeated (With deck nr 2 and a random deck) until the cycle is finnished.
Also to satisfy some curiosity on how basic looks like, here's how the routine that draws a card would look like.
But I know the memeticism, epigenetics, and both horizontal and vertical evolution by heart
I can also tell you a lot of fun stuff that ordinary people don't know about it.
I disagree on the existance of sexual evolution, since that's just a flashy concept that some people have tried to isolate from evolution, but which is just plain ordinary oldfashioned evolution with some explicit Male/female/bacteria action thrown in to upset people :P
Post that program, the excuse that your computer is broken is almost as credible as the "my dog ate my homework excuse"..... maybe your dog ate your computer?
In any case, your simulation is insanely simplistic and doesnt represent a game (still better than what I could do, mind you). Considering the explanations that you've written, the program doesnt even play magic the gathering, so your results shouldnt even mention magic the gathering. It's just using the very basic of magic battle phase and applying them blindly without any interraction. The results represent virtually nothing. This remind me of your 5 (4) kill turn claims a long time ago. Where it was possible to kill on turn 5 with the deck you had posted (but not 4 like you had claimed and then claimed it was a typo... a typo that you had done several times....) but the opponent had to do absolutely nothing for 5 turns. Both suffer from the same problem, you are playing blindly agaisnt nothing. This is not magic, it's an hollowed shell of the basic rules of magic.
If you want to make a simulation with any kind of significance, you have to make 2 decks battle each other, if you could create such a program, I'd be happy to see your results, untill then I'll return with my first answer, your simulations do not represent anything worth even analyzing and your proofs are very sketchy at most. ..."window.parent.tinyMCE.get('post_content').onLoad.dispatch();" contenteditable="true" />Keeper : Reported
What do you mean by "all decks in the deckmemory will start out as a copy of a single manasolution" and "The deck that has the worst results are overwritten by the winning deck and mutated"? Could you elaborate on those points?
You might want to actually talk to the Flavor & Storyline Board people... since, you know, our whole reason for playing Magic is the flavor. I'm willing to bet you'll get a lot more interest there than in General.
Indeed, both posters down there would be thrilled.
When talks about banning Jace first started, I was thinking that I would see him banned come June 20th. But as I think more about it, I don't really think that Jace is the problem anymore. Sure his power level leaves very little to the imagination (opening Jace is like opening a refrigerator box with a naked girl on the inside), and sure his price does have a strong impact on what players choose to play (playing Jace is like being intimate with a woman and she doesn't charge you in the morning), but it is not the source of all the problems in Standard.
How do people think saving room to print more abilities on cards is dumbing down the game?
Do you really think, say, Akroma would ever be printed if she said, "Akroma can block by creatures with this ability and cannot be blocked by creatures without this ability. If a creature without this ability would deal combat damage by Akroma would be destroyed, prevent all combat damage that creature would deal to Akroma this combat. Attacking does not cause Akroma to tap. If Akroma is blocked and deals lethal damage, it deals the remainder of its damage to the defending player. Akroma may attack and use abilities that require tapping in the casting cost the turn it enters the battlefield. Akroma cannot be damaged, enchanted, equipped, blocked or targeted by black or red sources" rather than her "dumbed down" wording she has? No freaking way. Keywording and shorthand allows them to make complicated cards easy to play with, allowing them to be printed in the first place.
1. cast frankie peanuts 2. ask opponent "will you concede the game this turn"? if they say yes, you win; if they say no, play a staying power 3. subsequently ask "will you attack this turn"? and "will you cast a spell this turn"? (using a Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir for the second question if necessary) to ensure they can't disrupt the combo 4. donate them a platinum angel 5. play a mox lotus and braingeyser them for every card in their library. play an opalescence and donate them a glorious anthem and a blacker lotus , then play enchanted evening . play and activate a mindslaver and then donate them a fastbond and the mox lotus (returning one of the donates to your hand with eternal witness or whatever) 6. during their turn, play every permanent in their hand (playing lands with fastbond) then (as yourself) cast mirrorweave on the blacker lotus, so every permanent becomes a copy of it. proceed to tear up every card they control, and hopefully do it before they notice that they aren't bound by staying power's ability anymore and can concede
Shortly before Serra died, she transferred her spark into an angel whose full name was Asha Avacyn Bolas. Her dragon father groomed her for her positions in Alara and Innistrad, and she's also been getting help from her uncle Ugin in the form of Urza, who was resurrected as Marit Lage to be the avatar as which she projects herself into material realms. Grieslbrand is a split personality who sometimes wanders the planes disguised as a human woman named Liliana Vess.
Everyone's life would be easier if players would, instead of coming to the 'net for help with a deck, just netdeck and be done with it. And I'm not talking about some Top 8 lists, for the Casualists, too, can benefit from netdecking. I've netdecked plenty of decks from the Casual Play forums from users such as Mown, Raedien, Floopfoot, and a few others. I snatched straight the heck out of my web browser. Yes, people, your original idea fell victim to a savage netdecker. You have been assimiliated.
Suppose I wanted a Zombie deck. Why on earth would I spend time searching Gatherer for a decent list of Zombie cards when Raedien already did it for me? Taking time to be creative or waiting on people on the forums to tell you why your deck sucks or 'go to Casual forums' is a disasterous waste of time (to me).
That being said, Magic was ruined back in Alpha when they added all that rules and cards [Debutantes avert your eyes]. My friends and I still like playing it the "pure" way (Basically we go into the woods and hit eachother with wiffle bats while shouting made up obscenities. You know, the way Garfield wanted it to be played).
Don't worry about it. I've come up with a list of changes to fix EDH.
-First off, there's no commander. -The minimum deck size is 60 cards, and each deck can have up to four of each card, save basic lands and relentless rats. Also decks have no color identity. -Starting life total is 20.
Here's a clever play you can try yourself: -Convince friend to run relentless rats.dec in legacy tournament -Get a deck with lots of mill, yixlid jailer, and humility -Drop humility and jailer, wait for him to dump his hand, mill him out -All his rats now have no abilities. Call a judge because he's playing an illegal deck with more than 4 of a single card. -Get him/her banned from competitive magic play
The outer layer of the Magic: the Gathering box, the carton, or crust, is fairly thin and light, and contains largely aluminosilcates.
Within that lies the middle layer, consisting of the familiar booster pack. Although solid, the booster packs' high temperatures allow them to acutally move around within the booster box. This flow, sometimes called convection, is cited by frustrated box mappers as one of WOTC's most genious uses of thermodynamics since the Ravnica block.
No one knows what lies at the core of the booster box, but scientists theorize that it must be especially dense in order to make up for the large amount of fluff distributed amongst the booster packs.
I imagine [Ajani 3's] second ability involves him hurling the creature at your opponent Brion Stoutarm style, then the guy is just like "Okay, that may have worked, but don't- GOD DAMN IT!" as he does it again because cats don't give a **** :33.
Its like that one time Elves broke out in a field of Jund. Elves became a resurgent hit, then died off again once Jund adapted to the rest of the field of G/W that it required mass removal that inherently pooped on Elves too.
Submit to the menace. Delver can, and will blot out the sun.
And flavor goes out the window when you cast a second copy of a planeswalker right after the first one dies, so...
"Hey Nissa, I need a favor." "You just asked me for a 'favor' like thirty seconds ago, and it turned out to be having Sarkhan Transmogrify my only follower into a dragon like 5 times -which dickery aside also violates some laws of causality - and then you let me get beaten over the head by that hedron crab." "...I'll give you " "...Well all right then."
GM, I don't think Dill is better than you. I KNOW it. Even if he wakes up every morning, clubs a baby seal, steals all the TV remotes from within a block's radius of his house and then robs hungry orphans of their food he'd be better than you, for the simple reason that he learns from his mistakes.
What would they have to fight about? Like, all I can think of now is Gideon going "Hey, long-ears! I'm gathering a group of 'Walkers together to fight some tentacle monsters.....you want in?" and Tamiyo going "Ew! Hentai no bakka Gideon-desu desu!" and flying away.
MaRo has a thing for people opening boosters with bad cards. But since he can only get so many bad cards printed in each set, he has found a devious way of getting more bad cards into circulation: He makes entire print sheets with just bad rares, then puts them onto the assembly line. He proceeds to wring his hands and twirl his evil mustache that he grew for twirling purposes as a lightning bolt strikes in the background. Afterwards, he goes to make sure that the good cards are only opened by everyone's friends, and that we all only get to open bad cards. He does this by memorising each booster, than switching them around accordingly. Whenever someone complains about a card, he immediately jumps out from behind a chair to yell "WELL, IT'S NOT FOR YOU!" before merging back into the shadows in order to devise new ways in which he can screw over players, then claim that he has valid reasons for doing so.
Mark Rosewater is sitting in a seemingly innocuous cable TV van, outside of Bankaimastery's house. Sitting nearby are two hardened criminal hackers, fresh out of prison, and filled with resentment at their lack of physical fitness. "Have you managed to hack his brainwaves yet? The set deadline's coming up fast." "We're almost through. It should be coming up on the screen any second." The hacker presses a button, and Kevin's thoughts flash onto the screen. Mark and the hackers stare in amazement at the sheer beauty, the elegance, and the raw truth of what they see. It's like the ending to 2001: A Space Odyssey. Brilliant light shines across the screen, the truth of existence is made clear to them, and they despair at their own foolishness, their own ignorance, their own inadequacy. And then they steal his ideas. As they return back to R&D, Mark sneers at a haggard old man chained to a cast-iron sphere. The man looks up from his laborious task of breaking rocks in the dungeon of Wizards of the Coast headquarters, and asks a question: "Kevin, my greatest student. He - he's all right, isn't he? You didn't hurt him?" Mark deals him a weighty blow with his boot. "Know your place, Richard. Get back to work."
I'm only opposed to it because it bears so little relation to how people actually play the game. The example of Miracles is actually a much better one then the Clone example I was trying to use.
From the game's perspective, the card can move instantly from face down in the library to revealed in the hand and that's fine for the rules. But in real life, we can't actually do that, so the card spends a good bit of time in locations that are neither where that player's library is nor where that player's hand is. And that's fine for real life. What I don't want is the disconnect to be explicitly codified. Along the lines of
183664.697 A game of Magic as laid out by these rules exists only as a pure Platonic ideal, utterly unrealizable by fallible mortals limited by the confines of physicality and the ravages of evil and sin.
183664.698 The cake is a lie, too.
I know it's true, but I don't want the rules to actually straight-up tell me that.
Pfft this cant be serious can it? If it is please delete your account OP. Its not even close to ban worthy, considering what JTMS and stoneforge had to accomplish to get banned i see the WotC selling magic to aquire Pokemon before that ever happens.
I'm trying to imagine sorin markov as a gym leader in one of those pokemon games which you have to beat him to get his badge... somehow I imagine that he would stab you in the chest with his sword before giving you the badge, even if you beat his pokemon....
Personally, I'd be fine with tea time but then I'm not gonna waste the mana summoning Emrakul, the Aeons Torn . He always takes all the sugar, drinks the whole pot of Earl Grey and doesn't even say thank you. SO. RUDE.
Break the Card is a regular thread in the Cards and Combo Forum. Quite simply, the participants are given a Johnnystatic card (e.g. Xenograft ) and are asked to build a deck around it. The winner and honorable mentions are sigged below. Get brewing!
This week's Break the Card was based around Xenograft . Thread : http://community.wizards.com/go/thread/view/75842/27681049/Break_the_card_:_Xenograft?pg=1
Winner : Axterix with his Vampdrazi deck. Finalist : Vektor480 with his Ally/Golem/Plant deck. Honorable mentions : Zammm for the Turntimber Ranger combo and TinGorilla for suggesting Sarkhan the Mad .